PC 69-163~~:
,~
.T
RESOLUTION NO. ~C6U-163
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2104 gg APPROVC-D IIJ PAi~T
1. Thet the petitioner requeata e vertence from the Anehelm Municlpel Code as fOl lo,vs, to es tabl ish a
four-plex apartment .r,omplex on subject property:
a. SECTIOPJ 18.?8 050(7) - Minimum buildinq site area n er dwellinq unit
(2400 square feet required; .
1423 square feet
propbsed).
b. S[CTION 18.28.050(4) Maximum Lot coveraqe. (45% permitted; 46.3~
proposed).
c. SECTIOPJ 18.28.050(6-b-1) Minimum side ~ard setb~ack..
8 feet proposed). (15 feet requii•ed;
d. SECTION 18.?8.050(7-f) Stairway proiectinq into mor e than 5d~ of the
req~~lred side yard setba• I~s,
i~
WIiEl2EAS, the Clty Plnnning Commis~ion of the City of Maheim did reccive e verified Petition for Varience from
MARGARET ILLINGWORTN, 901 Gretchen NJay, Anaheim, California 92805, ONner; AUGUST VILJAK,
511 N. Zeyn Street, Anaheim, California 92805, Agent of certain real property situated in 'he
City of Anaheim,County of Orange, St3te of California, described as i.ot IQo. 14 of T:act ho.
169, in Miscellaneous ~daps Book 12, Page 23.
WHEREAS, thc City Planning Commiseion did hold a public headng et the City Hell in the City ot Anaheim on
July 28~ 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public heering heving been duly given es required by
lew endln eaeotdenc~ cyt~ ~e provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
end egeinat aeid proposed vorience and to inventi~ete end meke findings end recommendations in connection therewith;
end
WHEREAS, sald Commisalon, after due inspeMion, investlgetlon, and study mede by itself and in its behalf,
and efter due consfderation of all evldence and reports oEfered at seid hearing, doea find ond detertnine the (ollowing
Eacts:
2. That waivei of 1-d above, is hereby denied on the basis that the pro~osed
structure can be redesic;ned wherein the si:airway need not project more than 50;G inte the
required side yard setback.
3. That there arc exceptional or extraordinary circumstancAs or conditions a~plicabie
to the property involved or to the intended use oF the property that do not apply generally
to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
4. That the requested varlanr.e is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by Other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
5• That the requested variance will not be materially detrimentai to the public
welfare or injurious t,o the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in whi~:h tFie
property is located.
That properties one block west and furthe: south on Zeyn Street are zoned R-3,
MULTIPLE FAMILY RE5ID6N7INL,ZONF; therefore, since subject propert.y has commercial zoniny to
the west, the Commission determined that the waivers under 1-a anc 1-b would be eiiminated if
R-3 zoning were establ.ished. As a result, staif vras directed to i~itiate rA~.lassification of
all R-2 Zoned properties betw,:en 1.~ Pnlmo Avenue and fdorth 5trcet Co the H-3 Zone.
in r,art
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant/subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby (ound to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
Anahei~se of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general wel(are oEthe Citizens ofthe City of
.~-'~
~~~ ,
i~
I
';
~
,~
~ -.
,,~
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strir
of land 10 feet in width from the centerline of alley, along the alley, for widening
purposes.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum
of 15~ per front foot along Zeyn Street, for tree planting purposes.
3. That the side~valks and curbs shall be removed and/or reconstru:,ted along Zey;:
Street as required by the City Enyinee: and in accordance with standard plans a~d
specifications on file in the office of the C:ty Engineer.
4. That t:~ash storage areas shall be provided in accurdance with aoproved plans on
file ~•~ith the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from
view.
6. That Condition tJos. 1 and 2, above rnentioned, shall be complied v~ith prior to
the time that the Building Permit is issued or vrithin a period of 180 days from date
hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time a, the Commission o: City Counril
rr.ay grant.
~. That Condition ;Jos. 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be con~piied r~ith ;~rior
to final building and zor,ina inspections.
8. That the owner(s) o: subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and
recreation fees of S75 per dwelling unit, as required by City Council Resolution, whi~~fi
shall be used for par~: and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the tin,e the
Building Perniit is issued.
9. That subject property shall be developed sn » tantially in accordance with plar,s
and soecifications on fiie with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit I~os. 1, 2, and 3,
provided, however, tnat stairtivays shal] not project rr:ore than 5~`,G into the :equired side
yard setback.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approve~by me this Q~ day o, August,'i 1989.
~
~ '
~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ I
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM1IISSION
ATTEST:
~ /
~I-~~,__ i c.%`~~2~. l:~•!~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
{:OUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAP~EIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plonning Commission ot the City of Annheim, do hereby cecti(y thn( the fore-
going resolution wes possed nnd adopted zit c~ mecting o( the City Nlonning Commission ot thc City of Anoheim, held on
July 28, 1969, ot 2;00 o'clock P,M., by the tollowing vote of the members thereo(;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Gauer, Farano, flerbst, Thom, Rowland
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A1lrect
i?Z
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havc hereunto set my hond this 7th day Of August, 1969.
~l ~ z , , "f 2 ~~ l.,
SECRETARY ANAHEIIN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO, ] 63
~ ~ V2-G
.t~t
.2.