PC 69-188' ~. *
.~ ~ 1
PC69~188
RESOLUTION NO.
' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING C01lyISSION OF THE ClTY OF ANAHEIM
f P.ECOMYENDIN~'f0 THE CI'fY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PE`~'ITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO ~ 69-70-11 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Ptanning Commission of the City oE Aneheim did initiate a verified Petition
for Reclassification on certain real ~roperty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
,~ Orange, State of California, described as the East 150 feet of the West 242 feet of the
~ North 170 feet of the South 200 feet of the South half of the Southavest quarter of the
Southwest quarter of Section 13, Township 4 South, Range 11 'Nest, in the Rancho Los Coyotes,
as shown on a map recorded in Bouk 51, page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said
county. 'Excepting that portion conveyed to the State of California recorded August 23,
1951 in Book 2220, page 426 of Official Records oF said ~ounty. Also excepting therefrom
that portion included within Ball Road, as described in the deeds to ±he County of Orange
recorded August 13, 1956 in Book 36Q°, page 357, and April 12, 1957 in Book 3872, page 131
of said OEficial Records.
; and
~
NNEREAS, the City Plmnin` Commissioo dld fald a public he~rin` ~t tl~e City H~11 in the City of Maheim
on Sept. 8, 1969, ot 2:00 o'clock p.M. notice of sdd puWic M~rina h~ving bsee duly ~iyen a. ..~.~~~~.~,~ t,~
l~M ~nd ia accordance with the provisioes o[ tM M~eim Mmlcip~l Cod~, Ch~pt~r la.T2, to he~r ~nd consider
evidence for end yoinat said proposed reclaasitie~tion ~nd to investlpte and molc~ tindin~~ and recommend~tions
in connection thercvith; and
IYHEREAS, aeid Commis~tion, after due fnspection, invettiQation, and etndy m~de by itself rnd in its be-
h~lf, and ~her due consideration of ~11 evidence ~nd reporta oEfered et s~Id he~dna, does find ~nd determine the
following facte:
1. Thatthe Commission proposes a reclassification of the above described properLy
from the R-A, Agricultural, Zone to the C-1, General Commercial, Zone to place an
existing service station into the most appropriate zone.
2. That the scope of the proposed reclassification, ii approved, does not warrant
an amendment to the General Plan at the oresPnt time, however, its relationship to the
General Plan symbol will be considered at the next annual review.
3. Tha+ the proposed reclassification oi subject property is ner,essar.y and~or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the communi±y.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate
to the zones and their permitted uses !e~ally established in close proximity to sub,ject
property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the
community.
5. That s~abject property is a parcel originally deleted from reclassification of
many R-A parcels by the Commission several years ago, o~ the assumption that its location
on Beach Boulevard we:•uld war.rant Commercial Recreation Zoning. However, tYie General Plan -
1~69 does not now designate thi.s area for C-R Zoning, and therefore C-1 zoning is most
appropriate.
RD _1,
~x.=-:
~ ~, •
. ~
..
. ._... _ _ .. _. . ._ _ _
._,.
~ ~ .. ~,
; NOW, TI;EREFORE, BE I'f' ~ ~OLVED th~t the Anaheim City Plannia~. ,~'ommIosioa doea heroby recommend
~ to the City Cuuacll of the City of Mahetm th~t subject PeUtion for R~c1usl$catioa be appmved end, by so doing,
'`t that Title 18-Zoning of the Aneheim 114unicipd Code be ameaded to esclude tho ~bove deecdbed property fmm the
; R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the C-1, Gen~eral
~ Commercial, Zone, unconditionally.
' THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved me this 18th day of S ep; ember, 1969.
i ;
- ~, J
,, ,
CH MAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
' ; ATTEST:
~.~~ ~.~ ',,~.2~
:' ' ,
~ ~~~ SECRETARY ANAH CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~~r
~ I ~~x STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
`{ COUNTY OF ORANGE
~ ) ss.
` CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~' i;
~" • I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
~~ the foregoing resolution was pessed and adapted at e meeGng of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
~`,: ; held on September 8, 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
~ A AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Thom, Rowland.
~'.' I >,
1 j':~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
~-
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Farano.
~
'; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 18th day of September, 1969.
F:~ ~ ~~~~ -~~ /
~. ~/vs'°~`~~ i .~T ~r_= 'L'2/
K' SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
4' ~
~ ~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. 188
{'~ ~
;;~ * R2-A _2_
.._.-~ ~~. -------.._, - ..__ _._...,..~
~.
,_;r _
~