PC 69-205oy
RESOLUTION N0. PC6Q-~05 V~
A RESULUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69-70- i 3 HE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a veriEied Petition fr,; Reclassifica-
tion Erom AUSTIN B. FORDYCE, AND DAVID C. TONS, 903 South Agate, Analieim, California 92804, Ownrrs;
JAMES HODGES, 903 South Agate, Anaheim, California 92804, Agent of cer;,ain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot 23 oi Tract No.
3611, as per map recorded in Book 132, Pages 20 and 21 of Miscell~neou;, Maps, in the office of
the County Recorder of said County. Except an undivided ~ of all minerals, ores, precious and
useful metals, substances and hydrocarbons of every kind and c:haracter, including petroleum, oil,
gas, asphaltum and tar, as granted to Elaine Seitz Eley, a married woman, by deed filed April
22, 1954 as document No. 28994, in the office of the Registrar of Titles. The South 150 feet uf
the West 75 feet of the East 291 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of the
Northwest quarter of Section 26, Township 4 South, P.ange 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon
de Santa Ana, as per map recorded in Book 51 Page 10 of Miscellaneous ~J~aps, in the office of the
County Recorder of said County.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public heering ei the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
October 6, 1969 at 2:00 o'clock P,M. notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accotdence with the provisions of the Aneheim T~7unicipal Code, Chopter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for and ageinst said ptoposed reclessificetion and to investigate end make findings end recommmdations in connection
therewith; end
WFiEREAS, eaid Commiasion, aEtet due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself and in its behalf, end
efter due conaideretion oE all evidmce and reports otEaed et aeid hearing, does find end determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclessificetion of the above described property frem the R-A, Agricultural,
Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in conformance with the Preliminary General.
P1~,~ - 1969, and land uses to the east, west, and north.
3. Thet the proposed reclessificatton of subject propedy is necessary and/or desirable fot the orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
4. That the proposed recloasiEicntion of aubj~ect ptoperty does properly relete to the zones end theit permitted
uses locelly established in close proximity to aubject property end to the zones end their permitted uses generelly esteb-
liehed throughout the communlty.
R-A
-1-
~
~
.~
NOW, ~EREFORE, BE IT -~ SOLVED that W~ An~heim City Ptunnic ;E:o:nmia~ion does hereby recommend
to the City Council of Ehe City ofvAnaheim that subj~ct P~Ution for R~c1~saIfic~tion be ~ppcoved ~nd, by so doing,
thot Title 1&Zoning of the Aaaheim Municip~l Gie be ~meeded to exclude the ~bove described property from tF~
R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the R-3, Mul'tiple
Family Residentiai, Zone, upon the following conditions which are liereby found to be a nec-
essary prex•equisite to the proposed use of subject property in orde~r to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
2. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required ar~d determined to be necessary
by the Chief of the Fire Deaartment.
3. That subject property shall be served by underground uti.lities.
4. That any air-cor.ditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the
sound buffered from adjacent residential homes.
5. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shal.l be comolied with prior
to final building and zoning inspections.
6. That the ownars of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $75
per multiple-family unit, to be used for park and recraation purposes, said amount to be paid
at the time the buiiding permit is issued.
THE FOREGOL~iG RESOLUTION is oignrd and appmved e thie th day of Oc~tober, 1969.
CHAI MAN ANAH CIT PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/
/ ~~z ~-c - '~ ~ ~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM'ISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim, do hereby certify that
the fotegoing resolution was passed end adopted et e meeting of the City Plmning Commission ;~f the City of Aneheim,
held on October 6, 1969 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: ~OMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Herbst, TFom, Rowland.
NOES: • COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 16th day of October, 1969.
'; I '
~ ~
~, ~x
RESOLUTION NO. 205
R2-A
f ~-r_-~-~~ /1Zc~~-h/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-Z-
~
n