PC 69-220,.:
i
~
~
~
RESOLUTION N0
PC69-220
.~~
.f
A RESOLUTION l':F THF. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PET1TfON FOR VARIANCE N~. 2129 HE APpROVID
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anehaim did receive a verified Petition fot Variance from
ERNST KRAUSE, 1919 Glenwood Lane, Nex•oor~t Beach, California 92660, Owner; KENNETH W. KRAUSE,
434 West Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California 92802, Agent of certair. real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County ~= Orange, State of California, described as that portion of
the northwest quarter of the northr:est quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 27, Tpwn-
ship 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rar.cho San Juan Cajon de Santa A,~a, as per map recorded
in book 51 page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said
county. Beginning at a point on the North line of said northre~st quarter, East 460.00 feet
along said ~orth line from tP,e northwest corner of said northcasi quarter; thence East
150.00 feet along said North line; thence South 265.06 feet parallel with the center line of
Harbor Boulevard to a line parallel with and southerly 265.U0 feet from said North line;
thence West 150.00 fest along said parallel ].ine; thence North 265.06 feet parallel with
tne center line o: Harbor Boulevard to the point of beginning.
VY'dEREA5, the City ?innning Commission did hold a public heering et !he City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
November 3, 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given as required by
lew endin accordence withthe provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1FS.6$, to hear and cons:der evldence for
and ageinst aeid proposed verience and to invectigete and make findings and recommendetions in connection therewith;
end
^ ~x
1YHEREAS, naid Comrcission, after due inspection, investigetion, snd 'study made by itself end ~in its behalf,
and efter due considrratio~ of ell evidonce and re~orte offeced at said heering, does find end detecmine the follow:ng
fects:
i ,
~
~ 1. Thet the petltioner requests e vatiar.ce from the Aneheim Municipel Code as follows, to expand an
I existing motel:
~ S ECTIGN 16.37.030(E-1-b) - Minimum number of required off-street qarkinq stalls.
(60 r~quired; 40 proposed).
2. That there ~re exceotional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
';~ the property or to the intended use of the property that du not apply generally to the
property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
3. That evidence submitted 'ay the ;:.etitioner indicated that approxinately 60% of the
rooms rented were to m~torists, and the balance were for guests arriving via airline,
, traval bureau, or bus tours.
4. That the petitioner submitted an impartial audited report of the registration cards
for 1969, which subs±antiated the claim nade by the petitioner that more than 40yK of their
guests arrived by other than private automobiles.
5. That although hotels in tFie City are required to provide only one space per each two
rooms while motels are requireu to provide one space for each room, the hotel's basic guest
list is daived from the same source as that of moteis, as it pertains to the C-R area.
6. That the request to waive 33% of •~he rPyuired parkiny on subject property to expand
the existing motel is deemed appropriate, and is granted on the basis af evidence sub-
mitted by the petitioner.
7. That a~proval of subject petition, waiving the r~quired number of parking spar,es for
motels shall not be construed as setting a precedent, since •the petitioner's evidence
substantiated less naed for parking, therefore, any subsequent request from similar motel
operations for waiver of parking should ba based on cimilar audited data to substantiate
the request.
8. That the petitioner stipulated if all parking spaces were occupied and rooms were
still available he would not rent said rooms and would advise the prospect that parking was
not available.
V 1-D
-1-
k
_...,:.....
; ._....,.~, ~ -^-•- '_=:-~..~,.,lr.
~
.. .
_ -._ __ _._._
-. _ _. _ _ _ ,. . _ , _ ._ .
s. _... _
E.:
; - • ~ .~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
f Petition for Varience, upon the Eollowing conditions which ere hereby foand to be a necessary prerequisite to 4he oro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welface of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That this variance is granted subject to the compl~ation of Reclassification No.
P 66-6~-61.
! 2. 7hat fire hydrants shall be insialled as required and determined to be necessary
` by the Chief of the Fire Department.
~ 3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
~ specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, ar.d 4,
~ provided, however, that kitchen efficiency units with a maximum of b-cubic foot refrigerators;
• two-burner stoves, excluding oven and baking facilities; and single-compartment sinks may be
+ installed; except that the manager's unit will be allowed to have full kitchen facilities.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved `y me this 1~'~1 day~f November~~ 1969.
. _ I ~ ~ ~ ~~
CHAH2MAN'ANAIiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-I';
- ATTEST:
?
° ~~/ ,~.~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
, STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
; COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
; `j, CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretary oE the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do :~ereby certify that the fore-
~ going resolution was passed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission efthe City of Aneheim, held on
November 3, 1969~ at 2:Q0 o'clock P.M., ty the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: A1].red, Camp, Herbst, Thom, Rowland. ~
~ ; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano.
~"i
~ ; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
i ABSTAINs COtJiMISSI0P7ERS: Gauer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thi~ ]3th day of Novembex~ 1969.
~2~ C. ~~~-G.G't~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMAiISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 22.0
V2-G _2_
C~ . `
r