PC 69-232~
RESOLUTION N0. _ PC59-232
A RESOLUTION OF TFIE CITY pI,ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF' ANAHEII4f
TNAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2136
' BE DENIED
WNEREAS, the Cit
FREDRICKS y plenning Commission of the
DEVELOPM CitY of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for
Owne-; FL-DERAL ~T ~RPORATION, 524 West Commonwealth
92707 SIGN AND SIGNqL CORPORAI'IpN Variance from
, Agent of certain real +~~36 South Oak 8treet~n' California 9
State of California pTOpert Santa Ana 2632,
South Half op + described as Y situated in the City of Anaheim, + ~aliforn;a
the Southwest the West eleven (11) acres of ~ount
S` B' B• $ M• EXCEPTING therefromeT of Section one, the South halrof Orange,
the 5outherl ~ Tolvnship 4 South, °f the
Y 4~5 feei of the !"JesterRange 10 ~Nest,
y 330 feet thereo~.
NovembeHEREAS, the City plannin
1969, 8 Commisaion did hold a
1eW end in eccorda~~e 8~ z~00 o'clock P,M,~ notice op Se°.dlic hearin at
end e ~~ ~~ provisions of the B the City Hall in the Cit of
6einst said pjoposed ve~iance and Anaheim Munici ej Public hearing ha~l~ S' Anaheim on
e~a to investigete and P Code, Chepter 18,6g, ~a been duly g;~en as required by
make findfn s hear and consider evidence for
6 and recommendations in connection therewith;
WNEREAS, eeid Commission, aftcr due inspection,
and after due consideration of a11 evidence end
facts: investigetion, and study niede b
~eports offered at seid hearin Y itself and in its
g, does find and determ• behalf,
1• That the petitioner re ~e the follow;-g
rais ing an existin Quests a varience from the Anaheim Municipel Code as follows,
g 25-foot hi~h free-s
tandiny sig~ to 40 feet in heighto~ pPrmit
S EC_~_18 62.090(B 2)
------~_ - Maximum siqn hei ht within
structure 300 feet of' a residential
2. That ~~-~ ~25 f-=et Permitted• qp
there are no exceptional ~ fe=t pr°POSed)~-
apPlicable to the or extraordinar
not apply 9anerallrf~Derty involved or to the intendetlircumstances or
3• That the re Y tO the propert use op ~onditions
q~ested variance is~r ~iass o£ use i~ the prooerty that do
of a substantia) not necessar the same vicinit
zone, and denied to~thet~ xight ~osse;sed b Y for the Y and zone.
y other PresErvation ar,d enjoyment
4• That a restaurant pronerty in questi.on. Pr~perty in the same vicinit
previously requested an increaseame ;hoopi~G center Y and
and Planning Commissior; denie ~~ hei ht of their 51 ~hich subject sign is located
undesirable d the request on the bas~9 ' hOWeve:, both the Cit•
ior similar identi~ficafor similar requests from all ls that
this ~' ~oun:i~.
5• That identificatio~not' sub'a ~'ould establisl~ ;~
the lessees in this sho
Boulevard ex J-ct FF1~9 ~enter.
identificatio~ssig~is desired b pro~e'ty can be accJmplished if S
y inco.porating another sign in tate Co11egF
a 6• That the petitioner submitted the sho
pplication ~ PP1~9 center
o~ the sign ordinance, n~ e~'1°~~~~e that a
hardship was created by the
Vl-D
-1-
~ - .:..°~r'7^-°-
r.
F
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Veriance on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved y m~ this 2 th da o
Y ovember,\1969.
,I i
~
i ) ~ i!~ ~-
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ :~ ~i~'L'X_ ~~"t.i ~f,~cJi ~
,,.I ; SECRETARY ANAHETM CITY PLANNtNG COMMISSION
+ i
~" 't STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
;~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
('.~ ~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
F
~: I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereb certif
r% going resolution wes passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Com~nission of the City of Anahetimhheldton
` November 17
' i, , 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock p,ry~,~ by the foilowing vote of the members thereof:
~~ ~ AYES: C O M M I S S I O Y E R S: A l l r e d, C a m p, F a rano, Gauer, Herbst, Thom, Rowland.
~
NOES: COMM1IISSIONERS: None.
' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~~~ne.
i `:
`' ' IN W)'iNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 26th day of November, 1969.
~~i I ,
//,~ /
~~~L,~G!~/- ^~-~%
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIrG COMMISSION
-2-
~
~