PC 69-234RESOLUTION N0. pC69-234
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
T4AT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2138 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City PlannIng Commission oE the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from
ROBERT M. TI-IOMPSON, 921 South Gilbert Street, Anaheim, California 92804, Ovoner; FOREST E.
OLSON, INCORPORATED, 1959 East Lincoln Avenue, Ariaheim, California 92805, Agent of cer:ain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Cc+unty of Orange, State of California,
described as Lot 54 of Tract No. 2468, as per rrap recc.rded in book 85, pages 28 and 29,
Miscelianeous Maps, in the office of the County Recorde= of said County.
WHEREAS, the City Plonning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the Clty of Aneheim on
November 17, 1969, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public heering heving been duly ~,iven es requi:ed by
lew and !n eccordaace with fhe provislons oE the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and ageinst seid proposed varience end to inveatiQete end meke find}ngs and recommendeFions in connection therewith;
and
WNEREAS, eald Commissfon, efter due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself end in its behelf,
and efter due conside:ation of all evidence nnd reports otfered at seid hearing, does find and detertnine the tollowing
fects:
1. Thet the petitioner requeats e verience from the Anaheim Munlcipel Cnde, a5 fOl lOwS, :0 permit the
expansion of an existing medical office facilityinto an existing residence on an adjacent
R-1 Zoned lot•
S ECTION 18.24.010 - Permitted uses in the R-1 Zone.
SECTION 18.04.030(b-1) - Minimum reUuired parkinq soaces (5 s~aces required;
2 snaces proposed).
2. That approval of the proposed variance request would in effect be tantamount to
approving commercial zoning in this residential area, and such approval would set an un-
desirable precedent for add:tional requests for commercio; use of the single-family homes
fronting on Gilbert Street, which in turn would have a deleterious effect upon the established
residential integrity of this general area.
3. That subject property is within one of the number of areas considered for potential
commercial conversion in A Studv of the Probierr of Residential Homes Frontinq on Arterial
Hiqhwavs, adopted by both the Planning Commission and City Council in 1967; that said study,
as adopted, indicated that the residential homes fronting on the west side of Gilbert Street
between Ball Road and Stonybrook Drive should be retained for residentia] uses; and that
approval of the proposed request would be contrary tu this policy statement.
4. Tl;at that there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or condit.:ons
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the prooerty that do not
apply generally to the propezty or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
5. Thdt the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to the oroperty in question.
6.That the requested variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare and
injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property
is located.
%. That one person appeared in oppositi.on.
~ ~1 .
; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE6 thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
I' Petition for Vatiance on the besis of the aforementioned findings,
~ 1
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved e this 26 day of `~ovember, 1909.
~
1
/ _,~J
CNA MAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
i:
/ ~
'~Z ?~ ,~~~i-fhr~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereb certif
going resolution was pessed and edopted et a meeting o( the City Plenning Commission of thc City of Anahetimhheldron
November 17, 1969, et 2:00 o'clock p,ry~,~ by the (o:lowing vole o( the members thereot:
I' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Far~no, Gauer, Herbst, Thom, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~~one.
i
; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 25th day of Pdovember, 1469.
i
~ _
' _~/>> :~ ~ ~Sl.~ /~ ~ ,
I SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
'~
t~~ `~
J '~x
'r,+,'
RESOLUTION NO. ~34
V2-D .2.
~ ~ -.,.:,-.~,._. ,
, _~_~. _ ;
~ ,., . . ~,._,.:.:... -. ,, ,. ... _.. ~ ~_ .
' -- --- .. , _,: ...,..,_ ,,._._
i . . ~ ......