Loading...
PC 69-245'Y;: ~. RESOLUTION N0, PC69-245 A RE50LUTION OF T'dE CITY PLANNING (:OMMISSION UF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT F~ETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2133 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, the Ciry Plenning Commission oE the City of Aneheim did receive e verified Petition for Verisa^e from GRACE BIBLE Ci~fURCH, 2550 West ^:a~ge Avenue, Anaheim, California 92804, O~~mer; :~AVID G. MADDOX, 111 North Western Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801, Agent of certain real propert~~ situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Califor~ia, described as tYie voith 396 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 4 South, Range 11 West, S. B, 8 M. according to the Official Plat thereof. FXCEPI the West 536 feet thereof. ; and ~ WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim ; on Dec. 1, ~ 969~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice aE seid public hearing having been duly given es required ~I ;' by law and in acrntdence with the provisions of the Meheim Municipal Codq Chepte: 18.68, to tear and consider evi• dence fot end egeinst said proposed verience and to investigete end make findinga end rernmmende!ions in connection therewith; end ~ti~ WHEREAS, aaid Commission, efter due inspection, invcstigetlon, and study mede by itself end in its behelf, end efter due cansidetation of ell evidence and reoorts offered et seid hearing, does find end detertnine the tollowing fects: 1. Thet the petitioner requests a variance from the Aneheim Municipal Code 35 fo11CwS ~ 1~ establ ish a one-story, 16-unit apartment r.omplex on subject propertys a. SECTION 16.28,050(6-b-2) - Minimu! m d;etar.ce betwe~~ struc±ures :,nd ornpertv lines. (23 feet required; 10 feet prroposed). b. SECTION 18.28.050 7-a - Minimum distance between buildin4s. ~10 and 24 feet required; 8 and 14 feet prop~swdl, 2. That waiver 1-a, above mentione~j, is hereby grar~te~] on the ba~sts tfiat the propo~,ed 10-f~ot area is devoted to private patio use and simiiar N3ivers have bec;- granted on num~erous occasions. 3. That waiver 1-b, above mentioned, is hereby granted on the basis that due t.o the design of the project, the proposed building s?parations ac.pear to be ade~uate. 4• 1'het there ere exceptionel or extcaocdinary c{rcumstances or conditions eppllceble to tl~.. pc~r .:t~ tnvolved or to the intended use oE the property that do not epply gmerelly to the property or cleas of uae in thc ncz::e .'. z;nity end zone. 5• That the requested varience is necessery for the preservetion and mJoyment of e substential propcrty right possessed by ather property in the same vicinity and zone, a~d denied to the property in question. 6. Thet the requested veriance will not be materially detrimentel to the publlc weltere or injurious to the pro~~. erty or improvema~ia ln such vicinity end zone in which the property is located. ~~ ~ ; ~~.~ .~ .~. ; . - ___ ___ . . .~. ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the (ollowing conditions which are hereby foun~ to be a necessary p~erequisite to the pro- posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the satety and genera] welfare of the Citizens o( the City of Anaheim. 1. That this •;3rian~e is qranted subject to the completion of Reclassification !!o. 69-70-21, npw pe;ding. 2. That a mutual easement agreement for common use of private drives located in the southern portions of subject property and the prooerty immediately adjacerit to the west shall be filed with and approved by the City Attorney and then recorded; or, a minirnum 54-foot diameter turneround for fire and trash vehicles shall be provided on subject property, prior to final building and zoning inspections. 3. That subject property sha11 be developed s~bstantially in accordance with plans anc specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit IJos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6; provided, however, that if ooen parking is proposed adjacent to the connecting drive to the property to the west that said connecting drive shall ~e 25 feet wide; and further prcvided, that if no parkinq is propo;ed adjacent to the connecting drive, then a?_0 foot wide drive may be constructed. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved b me this \]~th da of Dec mber, 1969. 1 ~ ~ CN P.MAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C0~1Af1SSI0N ATTEST: ' .'~ 'J'7.71 i~ / ~ ~ Ai'~~i SECRETARY ANAHF,IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALJFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ~ gs, CITY OF ANAHEIM ~ I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretory o( the City planning Cemnission o( the City o( qnuheim, do hereby certify thot the fore- going resolution wes pnssed nnd edopted at e meeting of the City Planning Com mission ofthe City ot Anoheim, held on December 1~ 1969 at 2:00 o'clock p,M., by the following vote o( the members thereo[; AYES: COMMiSSIONERS: Camp, Farano Gauer + , Herbst, Thom, Ro~r.~land. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Plone. - ABSEN7': COMMISSIONERS: Allred. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set m}• hand this l lth day of December~ 1969. I' I ~. t ~~7„ ~., / ~ ~'~ (/' ~ I,~ ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU7'ION 1d0. 245 '~ ~ I V2-G t~ I .2. ,~ ~ , ? { i ! .~ ~ - --- -- ,,.. ~.-.' .?~,`e:;. .