PC 69-25~
~ 1
RESOLUTION N0, p~69-25
A RESdLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AI~AHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VRRiANCE N0. 2~53 HE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a vedged PetitIon for Veriance
from MARY JANE PFEIL, 3064 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801, Owner; PAUL B.
TREAT, P, 0. Box 7, Ful:ierton, Ca~ifornia 92632, Agent of certain real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and ref~red to herein as though set forth in full.
, and
,n
.'` WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisaion did hold a public heering et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
~ r on Februar 10 1969 et 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid ublic heorin havin been dul
~ Y e ~ , p Z e y given as required
''' by low and tn eccordas.ce with the provisions of the Meheim Municipal Code, Chopter 18.68, to hear and consider evi-
~'~ dence for and agoinst said pmposed veriance ond to investigete and make findings end recommendo4ons in connection
~;s therewith; and
_ .~
:.~ WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, and study m~de by it.adf end in its behalf,
>~ and efter due consideration oE all evidsnce end reports oEfered ot said hearin~, does fiad ~nd deteenine the following
':3 facts:
,~~
~~ 1. That the petitioner requests a verience Erom the Meheim Municipel Code as follows, to permit the
~ establiehment of a 93-unit one and two-story apartment complex on Parcel No. 2:
r:.1
SEGTION 18.28.050(7-a) - Minimum distance between oarallel walls of the same
;x u'ld' . (2~ 16 16 and 17 feet required; 13. 10,
I;'~ 12. and 10 feet respectively proposed)o
-._~ SECfION 16.28.050~9) - P~x~mum distance of livin~units from a standard street.
'~= ( 02 0 fgg;, moximum distance permitted; 43-units from ?00
~l to 396 feet proposed).
2. That there ere exceptionel or eztreordinery circumstences or conditions eppliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not apply gmerelly to ffie property or class of use in the same vicinity end
zone.
3. Thet the requested varience is necessary for the preservatior, and enjoymmt of ~ substantiai property right
possessed by other p:operty in the same vicinity end zone, md denied to the property in quastton.
4. Thet the tequested varience will not be meterielly detrimentel to the public welfore or injuriaus to the prop-
erty or improveroents in such viciniry and zone in which the property is loceted.
5. That one person appeared in opposition expressing concern that extending Del Monte
Drive thru the R-1 development to the west will create a traffic hazard to the children of
the area, and that drainage will be inadequate to take care of the additional drainage from
tt~e proposed development.
Vl-G _ 1 _
~
_ h
"~~
'- i
zl
~I
~
rl
, . : I .
~...-
,
;
4
~~
F
~i '
~a ~. ,
~ ~ I~ .
., i~
~ ,
:~
f ; ~ I'
;1
i ~
;.~ _- ---
D~ir as of Decetni~~: r l~i , L~(;f? __ -
at 7 30 a.rn.
~ ~' R ,, ,. ~
+ WtJ~.s~A
`7F' J.~ ~~f(~- ---7iiLE GIr~~ER
/
VE57EE~ P~Lr1RY JNJG P?'EIL~ fls }:er ee~r,u~,: i,ropNrty,
i
` \
..,, ~
~i
~ ~!
~ ' • ~, , `+~_....... _ .' . . . . ,
. ~nF~ __ _. _
I~ Pi\RCEL V0. 2 , , -r'•
I - - .,e.,.
1 T.hat portion of the west half of the west half of the north-
2 east quarter of the norti~east quarter of Section 14, Township 4
3 South, Range 11 S~est, City of Anaheim, in the Rancho Los Coyotes,
4 as sho~+n on a map recorded in Book 51, page 11 of Miscellaneous
5 riaps~ recoxds of Orange County, California described as follows:
6 Beginning at a point in the west line of Tr.act No. 4230,
7~ with the wester].y prolongation of tt~.~ centerline of Del Monte
8 Drive as shown ori a map recorded in Book 243, pages 43 and 4q
9 of :•Iiscellaneous biaps, records of said Orange County, said
10 •point being the beginning of a nontangent•curve ~oncave northerly
11 and having a radius of 800.00•feet, a radial line through said
12 point bears South 0°16!08" East; thence westerly along said
13 curve through a central angle of 11°90'15" an arc distance
14 of 162.96 feet to a point in a reverse curve concave southerly
15 and a radius o f 800.00 feet, a radial line through said point
16 2iears idorth 11°24'07" East; tllence westerly along said curve
17 through a central angle of 11°40'47" an arc distance of 163.08
18 feet; thence South 89°43'20" 41est 8.93 feet tangent to said
19 curve; t}ience Soutti 0°'18'05" East 32.00 feet; tnence
20 I~orCh 89°43'20" East 8.92 feet to beginning of a tangent
21 curve concave southerly and haying a radius of 768.00 feet; thence
22 easterly along said curve through a central angle of 11°40'47" an
2S arc distance of 156.56 feet to a point in a reverse curve concave
24 northerly arid having a radius of 832.00 feet, a radial line
~ 25 through said point bears South 11°24'07" West; thence easterly
~6 along said curve throual~ a central angle of 11°40'15" an arc
27 distance of 169.47,feet to a point in the westerly line of
28 said tract No. 4230, a radial line through said point bears
29 South 0°lfi'08" East; thence North 0°16,'06" S•7est 32.00 fe~t a].ong
30 said westerly line to tt•ie.point.of beginnin /
. 9• -
31 , : ' .
32 FVD: 1}: .~-.....~....._~.._,....,~.,,,,,.,_,~,"" r"""";-•-e-..... ;....,,,,,a
. Job ;10. 8182 - ~
I 1/21/69 ..,.,,i.v~: I': . ~ ~O ~"3~. „
.-~-~rr--~------------ ~ `'~
_ ~ _
~
` .,
..a - ~ f
- r
NOW, THEREFORE, Bli IT RESOLVED that the Anr+heim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Variance, upcn the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to presexve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That this variance is granted subject to the compietion of RQClassification No.
68-69-67.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office of the Director of Public Works.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and dete~mined to be necessary by
the Chief of the Fire Department.
4. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the w0st and south property
lines.
5. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view,
and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes.
6. Drainage oF subjeci property shall be discharged in a manner which is satisfactory
to the City Engineer.
7. That adequate corner cutoffs shall be provided on a11 on-site driveways.
8. That any par;cing area lighting shall be lighted with down-lighting a maximum 6-feet
in height and shall be c~~r~cted away from the property lines to protect the residential
integrity of the area.
9. That Condition . 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and Ei, above mentioned, sha11 be complied with
prior to final build~ng and zoning inspections.
10. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
.,t`,...,.
i~
~
t
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 20th day of February, 1969.
~
,'~ ?
~
'~ ,
e.•~ ~A
< ~~~~- ~t~ ( ~1~~i2,P~_
CHAIRMAN NAHEfM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
y
_ ~~c/-~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~f STATE OF CAL[FORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was possed and adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
February 10, 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMhTISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Farano, Gauer, Rowland, Thom.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Herbst.
1
IN WITNESS WHEREOG, I have hereunto set my hend this 20th day of Februarv, 1969.
',d
//~~L-yr~ ~4fi~ <~'
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 25
V2•G
_2.
~
~