PC 69-264~ i i
RESOLUTION'NO. P~69-264
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT'Y OF ANAHEIM
REPETITIONFOR R CLA SII ICATIONINO.F ~_70I32 O BE A PROVED T
WHEREAS, the City PlanninQ Commission of the City of Anaheim did reeelva a verified Petition for ReclnssiElca-
tion from KY~II6ET - DIVISION OF ENHART CORPORATION; 516 East Santa Ana Street, Anaheim, California
92803, Owner uf certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, described as Vineyard Lot H-2.
r.~.
r
; end
WHEREAS, the City Pl~nnin~ Commissiort did hold e public h~~dn~ at the Clty H~11 in tl:e City o( An~hefm on
December 29, 1969, et 2:00 o'clock P.M. aotice of nstd public h~arin~ h~viaQ been duly Qiv~n aa rcquIred by
law and in eccordance wlth the provisions oE the Maheim Municip~l Code, Ch~ptm 18.72, to he~r and con~ider evidence
for end aeatnst said ptopo~ed reclaarlficatfon au~d to invs~tl~~x~ ~ u~~~ (}A~n~e and recommendattons in connectlon
thetewith; and
"_ WHEREAS, s~id Commiseion, ~fter due inep~ction, iavssti~~tion, ~nd ~tudy m~de by itaelt and in it~ beh~lf, ~nd
efter due consideretion oE all evidence and reporte offercd ~t aaid ht~rin~, does find ~nd deterniine the fsllowin¢ ~ecta:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a reclaesificatlon of the above descrfbed property from the R-3~ lJ~ultipie
Family Residential, Zone to the M-1, Light Industrial, Zone.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in contormance with the Anaheim GenesaJ.
Alan - 1969, and land uses to the north and east.
3. That the proposed reclaseificatIon of subject property le neeessrry and/or desiroble for the orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
4. Thet the propoaed reclasaiflc~tion ~f eubject property does properly relete to the zones and their pertnitted
uses locolly eatebliehed in close proximity to subject property end to the aones and thetr permitted uses genera:ly estab-
lished thcoughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication and
improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General
Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensification
of land use.
6. That a more acc~ptable buffer between residential and industrial uses is a street,
and to recommend denial of subject petition, requiring it to develop with multi.ple family
residential uses, would establish an incompatible situation, wherein adjoining industrial uses
would create noises, odors, hours of operation, lights, etc., which would be detrimental to the
residents.
" 6L R"A -1-
~ ,
NOW, ~~EFORE, HE !T '. ,SpLyED t6at tfi~ Anab~lm City pl~nin~ ,ommi~sion doea heroby ~ecommend
to the City Council of the City of M~h~is th~t e-ibj~ct pKitlon for R~c1~~aiHcation be approved and, 6y so doInQ,
th~t Title 1&Zoning of the Anaheim 1Nanicip~i Cod~ be ~s~ndo~ ~ QAClude the ~bove deacdbed property from the
R-3, Nultiple Family Residential, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the
M-1, Light Industrial, Zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the Cit~ of Anaheim.
1. That the owner of subject property shali deed to the City of Anaheim a strin of land
32 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Olive Street including 15-foot radius
property linfa return for street widening purposes.
2. That all engicieering requirements of the City of Anaheim along South Street and Olive
5treet, incluiing preparation of improvement plans and installation cf all improvements, such
as curbs and g~tters, siciewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other
appurtenant wo•:k shall be complied with as reyuired by the City En~ineer and in accosdance with
standard p;?n~ and specifications on file in the o{fice of the City Engineer; and that street
lighting facilities along South Street and Olive Street shall be installed as required by the
Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and soecifications on file
in the office of the Director of Public Utilities, and that a bon~ in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shail be oosted with the City to guarantee the inst llation
of the above mentioned requirements.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office of the Director of Public Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by
the Chief of the Fire Department.
5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6. Drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to
the City Engineer.
7. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the
sound buffered from adjacent residences.
8. Prior to the intr~duction of an ordinance rezoning subject oroperty, Condition Nos.
1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this
resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are
complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may
grant.
9. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior
to final building and zoning inspecti~ns.
~ ;
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sIgnec~ ond approved by`me this 8 h day f Januafy~ 1970.
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~
,'~~ ~,
CH xMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AT.TEST: ~
_ (-'L 1-z~2_- ~~ 1~C~ -~~~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) $S,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Meheim, do hereb
the foregoing resolution wes pessed end adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anuheim,
held on December 29~ 1969' at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by thr. following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Herbst, Thom~ Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~auer.
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Farano.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of January, 1970.
~ ~ C~~L ~ c ' ~~ ~ ~
` SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSIaN
RESOLUTION NO. 264
a
atx R2_p -2~