PC 69-35;',,,;
,=.; .
3:f•'
i:
,~ .
I '
j ~
•I~
~ ' ~'
RESOLUTION NO. PC69-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2045 BE DENIBD
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition Eor Veriance from
BRJADWAY VILLAGE OF ANAHEIM, % BEVERLY COMSTGCK HOTEL, 10300 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles,
California 90024, Owner; RAYNOND N. ROUGH, P. 0. Box 3306, Anahe~m, California 92803, Agent of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Coun~y of Orange, State of California,
described as the South 2 acres of the Southeast quarter of the IJortheast Quarter of the hortheast
Quarter of Section 8 Township 4 South; Range 10 !'Jest; in the Rancho Los Coyotes; as per map
I~~;. recorded in book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said
'~f count Exce t the Easterl 279.33 feet thereof.
I :'r Y • p y
'.:l
,;.a
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public heering et the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
FebrUary 26~ 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving bee~ duly given as required by
law and in acconle.nce with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 13.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and ageinst said proposed variance and to investigote and make findings end recommendetions in connection therewith;
end
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study mede by itself and in its behalf,
and efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following
fects:
t
1. That the petitioner requests a varience from the Aneheim Municipel Code as follows ~ to establish a
66-unit, three-story apartment complex on subject property:
SEGTION 18.04.090(2-e) - Maximu;n_ bal~eo~v proiection into required yard. (2,~ feet
permitt ed; 51 f eet propos ed ).
Stairwav loca~ion inside setback.(12 feet required; 10:t- feet
;; propos ed ) .
SECTION 18,28.050(3) - ~~iinimum_floor area of a dwellinq unit. (700 square feet
permitted; 4$ units 545-699 square feet proposed .
S£GTION 16._8.050(5-a) - Maximum building heiqht. (Two story permitted; three story
proposed .
SECTION 18.28.050(5-b) - One story height limitation. (One story :vithin 150 feet of
a single family zone permitted; three stories v~ithin 150
f eet of R-A Zoned property to the east proposed).
S£GTION 18.28.050(6-e-4) - Minimum building setback from a local street. (15 feet
~ required; to 1 ~eet propose
s
SECTION 18.28.050(7-a) - Minimum distance between parallel facing walls of same
building. 24 f eet require ; eet propose
SECfION 18.28,050(7-d) - Minimum width of edestrian assa ewa .(8 f eet :equired;
4 f eet propos ed .
SECTION 18.28.050(9-a) - Adequate circulation for vehicles in~ludin trash collection
and fire vehicles.
SECTION 18.28.050(10-a) - Minimum number of off-street parkinq spaces (83 covered
parking soaces required; 66 1 al s aces proposed with 34
, tandem soaces and 3 uncovered spaces -
SECTION 18.28.050(10-c) - tvlinimum width of oarkinq spaces. (10 feet required; 9 feet
proposed).
SECTION 18.28.050(11) - Re uired G-foot masonry wall alonq the east and west property
lines.
SECTION 18.32.050(2) - Ninimum buildin site area er dwellin unit. (1200 square
f eet required; 590 square f eet propos ed . -
, ~ .. ....., ._
. __ 1' ~ _-~_-----~.~-, J _ , . _
-- -- ~ ' - . ~:t..."+t,,
~ ,
. y
` rv
f . . .. ,. . , _-.. __....__ . . . . i . . ... . . .. . _ . ..
. _ _.. _ _ . . ..__ _. _ . _,_. _..
. ~,g., _ . . . . .
~ ~'
~ ~Y' . ..
` ~~.,:: '' ~ }
~ ,;, ._.- ,
~ ~:;
~; {; 2 That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
~ t` the property involved or to the intended use of the propesty that do not apply generally to the
~. property or class of use in the same vicir.ity and zone.
` 3. That the requested vaxiance is not necessary for t`:e preservation and enjoyment of a
: ~ substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied
g to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or in-
~ jurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located,
, 5. That approval of the proposed density and coverage on a local cul-de-sac street would be
too excessive and could be detrimental to the living environment of the single family homes within
~ 150 feet due to traffic and other inherent noises associated with high density developments.
6. That approval of subject petition could set an undesirable precedent for similar reGuests
i throughout the City for small undeveloped parcels, negating the standards set in the R-3 Zone for ,
!`` ~~'"~~ .~ compatability with the area and depriving the potential residents of these facilities o: the
''.`~ `:i normal amenities associated with apartment developments.
^ i ' '';
:>; ~ ;; 7. That one person representing =everal persons presen't in the Council Chamber, appeared in
~`` ' ; opposition to the density proposed for the zoning requested along a local cul-de-sac having access
;~ thru a single family residential area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Varience on the basis of the eiorementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 3~h day of ASarch, 1~~_,';~.
,~-~~.l~~u ~ ~~~L-~~ •
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
_ ~-7v~2_~ ~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss., ...
CITY OF ANAHEIM ,,..- )
I~ An;i Krebs~ Secretery of the Clty Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
v~inR resoletion was passed and adoptr.ci r1 a meeting of the City Pla,ining Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
-~~="•=~='i -.~~"~°~ at 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the foilowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COIdMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Rowland, Thom.
. 4~~,; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Herbst.
ABSIAI~: COMMISSION~RS: Farano.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this `~ th day of ~~',~rch~ !': ~'''.
vi + 3 ~/ ~ /
~'+ " (/k 7 ~~ ~~ (~
ti^ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
!`'
RESOLUTION N0. 35
;' ~ V2 _Z_
~
~ ~
.let
•
~ R .
'~ j . .
~ .
~
.r .
~,,-.:..~,r.r~:.,.~,z ~..:.:...,~..,~,._~.. ~.,,.~.
._~.. , , ...~:.._ , .._ : _.
'~
. , ~; ._._.
..._ ,
~ _ ~ .,_ : ~..~,
_ __ - ,. , ~~;'- - -
~ ~ ~
i . - ` _ri