PC 69-36~,,.
,::~;:; .
~..,,
`';;:
'~~
-l
~ ~ `;'
~
~:
;; i
~:
r~ ~
:~ ~
r~ .
~F
RESOLUTlON NO. PC69-36
A RESO[.UT10lI OF THE ClTY pC.ANNIId~ Cp0{yISS7pN OF THE CITY ~F ANAHIE~I
RECOlOIENDQfG TO 1HE CITY CO()!(CQ, pF CI~y OF ANAHE1i1 'T1{AT
PETI?70lf POR RECLASQiFtCA'i70!(110. 6~~9-69 BE DISAPPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Pl~nnin~ Co~mlw~o~ o( the Clty of Mrhsim did receive ~ ved[(~d petitfon for Rr
clacsification from IIELEN WH5f, 916 South Knott Avenue, and PAftKE AND BETTY YOUNG, 920 South
Knott Avenue, Anahaim, California 92804, Owners; M, S. BERNARD, 615 West 8th Street, Santa
Ana, California 92701, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, described as Parcel 1: The South 75.00 of the North
339.00 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the 5outhwest quarter of
Section 14, Township 4 South, Range 11 West, as said section is shown on a map recorded in
Book 51, Page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County.
Except the East 400.00 feet thereof. Parcel 2: The South 75 feet of the North 414 feet af
the Southwest quarter of the Soutt~:vest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 14,
Pagesllpof Miscellaneous1Maps,trecords1of50range County~.vn Exceptingrtherefromnthe~Easterly
400.00 feet thereof.
; nnd
1NEREAS, tM City Pl~sin~ Co~~aia~ W~-d ~ prMic !-Nrlr~ ~ tM City }Idl in th~ Clty oi M~heim
onFeb. 26, 1969, .t 2:0p o'doek A.Y. ~stln o[ Nid pblie 6~~ei~i y~y~ ~~iY [j~'+o u rpuind by
l~w ~nd is occooi~.~ with t6o prordel~s o[ tM A~r1~t~ lirnldp~i Cod~~ Ch~tsr lt.7Z, to he~ ~sd con~id~r
evidwc~ for and ~`aln~t said 9rop~ teolwi6e~tM~ ~rd to i~v+~d
in corw+actfon th~rewit-~ ~nd L~~ andadcs tisdiap aidnooae~ad~tions
M'HERBAS, sdd C,oa~lulau, ~(tK di~~ ~e~~iw, t~wWSatiou, ~nd ~udy 4~da by its~lf Md ln it~ be-
h~lf, ad a[ta dee coe~iMr~tloa ot ~11 ~1d~w ~i npoets off~nd at add 6Nrin~, doM fiad ~ad dst~rmine th~
IOIIOM~pt tOCt~:
1. That the petftlon~r propoaes ~ ncl~s~i(icatbe of the ~bove doecdb~d P~p~~Y f~ th~ R-p, Agr.icultural,
Zone to ttie C-1, General Commercial, Zone.
2. That the scope of the proposed reclassiiication, if approved, does not warrant
an amendment to the General plan at the present time, however, its relationship to the
General Plan symbol will be considered at the riext annual review.
3. That because the use of the adjoining property to the south was limited to
medical and professional offices only although zoned C-1, and the proposed use of
subjeci; property for a convalescent hospital is permitted in the C-0, Commercial
Office, 7.one, it is recommended that the C-1, General Commercial, Zone reqest be denied,
in order that any uses established on subject property wil] be compatible with the
established uses to the south and be in conformance with t;,e commercial-professional
land uses projected for this area.
4. That the Commission recommends to the City Council that subject property be
reclassified to the C-0, Commercial Office, Zone on the basis that more intense C-1
Zones uses would not be compatible with the adjoining land uses.
5. That the recommended reclassification of subject property is nece<_sary and/or
desirable for the crderly and proper development of the community.
6. That the recommended reclassification of subject property does properly relate
to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject
proparty and to the zones and their permitted uses generally establish~d throughout
the community.
7. That the recommended reclassification of subJeci; property i•equires the dedication
and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation El~nent of the
General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the
intensification of land use.
RD
-1-
~
~
- _ ~,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anehelm Clty Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to Ltie Citv Council of the Citv oE Anaheim thet eubject Petition for Recl~esificatian '_o tl,e C-1, Gen~rai
Commercial, Zone be denied on the basis of th~ aforementioned findings.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anah?im City Planning Commission doe= hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Re~iassification be
apcraved for C-0, Comm~rcial Office, Zone, and by so doiny that Titie 18-•Zoning of the Anaheim
Municipal Code be amended to exciude the above d?scribed proqerty from the R-A9 kgricultural,
Zone, and to incorporate =_aid described property into the C-0, Commercial Office, Zone upon the
foti~wing conditions ~vhich are hereby found to be a n?:,essary p:erequisite to ±he proposed use
of ~~;bject property in order to preserve the safety and general ~velfare of the Citizens of the
City of Anaheim.
1, That the ownexs of subject property shall deed io the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53
f eet in width from the centerline of the street along Knott Avenue, for street widening purposes
2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering reauirernents of the
Citr of Anaheim along Knott Avenue, such as curbs and yuttErs, sidr~vralks, str?et 9rading and
paving, drainage fscilitie, or other appurtenant work shall be comp'_etud as required by the City
En~ineer and in accordance wiih standard plans and specifir_ations on iiie in the office of the
City Engineer, and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactor~~ to tne City of Anaheim shall
b? posted with the City to guarantee the instai?ation of said er.ginerring reaui:Fments.
3. That the ewners of subject property shall pay to the City ot F,~~aheim *he sum of ~2.00 per
front foot along Knott Avenue, for sireet lighting purposes~
4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim ttie =um of 15~ per
front foot along Knott Avenue, for tree planting purposes.
5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
w~th the office of the Director of Public Works.
6. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the
Chief of the Fire Department.
7. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north prop?rty line.
8. That any air-conditioning ;acilities proposed shall be properly shielded from vieva, and
the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes.
9. That any parking area lightina shall be lighted vrith dovan-liyhting a maximum 6-•feet in
height and shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity
of the area.
10~ That Conditian Idos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, sha11 be complied with ~vithin a
period of 180 days from the date.hereof, or such further time as the City Cour,cii may grant.
11. That Condition ~•los. 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above mentior.ed, sha11 be r.omplied with prior to
final building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 6th day of March, 1969.
_~ ~ ' -r~., ~i!!/ ~....~~,i~~~ .
CHAIRMAN A AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AT.TEST:
_~ ~ ~~ ~_,~'.~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Kr ebs ~ Secretery of the City Plenning Commission oE the City of Aneheim, da hereby certify that
the foregoing sesalution was pessed and edopted et a meeting oE the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
held on February 20~ 1959~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the followinq vote oE the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camo, Farano, Gauer, Rowland, Thom,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: hlone.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Herbst~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 6th day o: March, 1969.
'^a
r., i
~
/
~~ ~ ~'L/ ~ ,G G..~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 36
R2-A -2-
_ . _. . . _ , ,, _. .w~.~..~ ...
_.~
,.....,. _ _..,
.} , _
~