PC 69-44r'~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission rf +j-: f;:~ty oE AnahQim did receive a verifiea ?etitian for Variance from
EVA PULICH~ % LEONARD SMITH REAL L~ ATc, `~ U SQUth :'.a~~dina, Ar~ahri~r, ~_;':iiorr.~y ?.;g,~-,
LEONARD SMITH, 125-D South Ciaudina, Anah~_i~~, Gal;toinia 9~d0;,, .qc~;nt :; cr.ctair, r=;i ccoc~o^y~~. ~
situated in the City of Anahein~, Count~~ r;i Orange, St.at~ o ;aiifo.-;;,.7~:~-.r:.~~~ -
of Tract No. 787. =s Lo~ ilo., i9
A RESOLUTION OF THE f~ITY PLANNING CCEIMIS.'°,10N OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
'iHAT PE,iIT1'JN FOR VARIPNCE NO. ~C~~ BE '•~'°~ ~~~ :~. 1'A''
'ti ~
~
`. i -
:i ~
,:? ,~x
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a pvi:dic h~:aring -• the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
March 109 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.hi., notice of sai~;a
1aw end in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim i:iunic?pe! ~~od~'~Ch;3pter 18.68, to hear nd cons der evidence for
end against said proposed variance and to investigate end make fit~din~s e~d recommendations in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, aEter due inspection, inve~tigat~a~, and study mede by itselE and in its behelf,
end a:ter due consideration of ell evidence and reports of~ered ~: seid hearing, does f.ind end detertnine the following
fects:
1. Thet the petitioner requests a verience from the Aneheim Municipel Code as ,` o, i o;~s , to Fs t 3t,; ; s h j
two-•story 22-unit apartment deveiopment~
`+h
,. j
RESOLUTTON NO..__ ~~a-~~ ~
SECfION_18e28.050~b-a-•i •• Minim~m s*..ru:tural setba:k from an arte:ial hi
~1`~_ ~Y
-
(20 _eet req~ire~; 15 .`ee_ prooos?d aiong Baii ~o.i~~,
SEGTION 18 e 28. 050 6-•b-•2
~_~ ~_~+_
~ ~,.
- Minimum reauired side drd v~est sidu~„ ,.t ~E~« :
r
quired~ lO _?Pt r~roposed). -~
SEGTION 18,28.050~7_a1 - Minimum distan;e between buildinas. ;i6 fe•=t
`
:UU1: P;j•
10 f eFt p: opos ed j. '
SECTIOPI 1f3,28,050(10-c) - tilinimum_v~idth of parkina speYec, (~O
~foot i•ai~:;;
~=
~
r
qu:rNd.
~t ~vidt~ proposeci~.,
SEC?'ION i8~28o05D( i0-•ai -• Re uir~d rn~m~er ofro•,~e: <Md arkinq spaces.
~ 2P, :o
~
1
-
.
_ er :~
parking spaces require;i; 26 covered and i_un_ov_.r_~ ;ropo=Fd;
SECTION 18~28,050(6~~ - Ninimum structu:al setback fi•om a locai strF+t. (15 ~-
required; 12.8 feet proposed alon
1'Jeb
t
A
~
g
e:
s
vc;
,u~, ;
SECTIOIJ 18.28.050(10-e) - Screeninq of oarkino facilities from adiac~rt strFet.
(Adeau_ate screoeinp required; ina~leauate screeninc propo~ed
aiona Webster Avenve;,
?_. That althouqh the petitioner originaily requcsted :.aiJer of *.he :equired ;~r,ds_spinG ~n
the front setbac'r, area, minimum p~~estrian oassage;nay widths, adequa*_e ac:,ess for City s~:vicr:
vehicles, and maximum permissible stru:tural coverag?, revised plans submitted ~:av~ r;iminate~
these waivers, and theresore thA petitioner has requ•.sted withdra,nal of thr-_m.
3. That under the authority of =;ection i8.68~C60, ,~3iver of the s=zeening oi Ga:~iny
, facilities ~rom an adjacer.t stieet is hereoy grantFd, on the basis that the petitio:~, s?ip,,;d;~;d
to providing electric garage doors which then wou:d elimina±e the unsinhtliness of op~r g~:;~•a~,s
facing Webster ~.~~ cu~.
4. That aithouoh :evis.'r:lans provided ±h? required numb?r of :.over~9 r;;r'rirg spa,_;s, tnis
c:eated another waiver pf minimum structurai setb3ck from a local street, ar,d the Commissior.
the: ~tore, deems it ~ c:• : appropriate tr~ ermit o-,e o en
~arport bays, thus plac;.ng the carports but~ir.d the raquiredk159.ootcsetba~};ea:ong Vlebst..i~q~,nu~
thereby mai~taining the uni.ormity of setba~ks for szid strue?, and thFre.ore, ?he a!oi~,men±ioned
w~i~~er created by the revised olans is hereby granted on the Lasi; that the devF;upment ~,vii: no.~
; be in conformance with Code requir~ments.
~
AE
,y
5. That there are exceptional ox a>:traordinary ciz ,m;r.~n..ss u: ~.Gno,'.i:io-.s ~p~::; ;,~,.P
to the property involved or to the in~Ende~ u,e oi the p_op~r_y t~:a^. do r~o~ ap,.;,, c,:;:3!'.y
to the property cr class of use in the sam? vi;ini.ty ar~ -.on<_..
6. T:iat the requested variance is neccssary io: thF ~r,-;~i,•,tion ar.d ~:r.;~y;i...:~ o: ;
substantial property right possessed by other p:operty ir. the s3m<_ ~i_ir.it,y •,;,~ ~~o~;~~ ~;r.•~
denied to the property in question.
7. That the requested variance will not he material:y u~'rimenta:, to th~ puo;i. ::~.;ijr~
or injurious to ;.he property or improvements in such vicinit~.• ar,.1 co;~~ ~.;; ~~^;,.h th:: p:o,~~:-ty
is located. ~
8. That t;ie petitioner stipulated to ar~hi~ectural eleva;ionc a~ th_ ;;~:t~~:,: a~,,~..,,,,_
side of the p::oposed development to be similar in design as cha,. proFos~;i 'u.- ~r~< c;l: aodd
frontage, and that additional screen type landscaping wouid te• p1an+_4d ;.'~;ng th=; ~ti~ts~.=,.
Avenue front3ge adjacent to the open parking area.
i. That a letter was received in opposition to thr- num~zou; ~,v~iv~=zs ::iny ~:-,•;.-;~~;a,
NOW, TI-~RE~RE, BE IT P.E~LVED that the Anaheim City Pi:~nr.in9 Comn,is~io:~ :io=,; ~::-r~.c.•~
g:ant in part cubjFct Petition for 'Jari:~n~e, upor the fo:lo~nir.g cor.ditions t:r,i:.t; ;:; F,-: t;v
found to be a nececsary prer~quisite to the propo=r-d use of the sutjec± p:c~e_~~ ir ~.,~,.: ,~
preserve the safety and generai ~n~elfarF of ttie Citizenc of the City o: AnanFim.
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re:iassi•i.~tiun ;;o.
68-69-73. -
2. That subject property shall be d~veloped substanti~lly in accorianc~, with p',:s
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit 'los. :, 2, 3, ar,d :
provided, however, tnat the elevations of t,he V7ebster Avenue side sf:sl: br: r,pmPy_d~,E to
that of the Ball Road frontage; that electrir. doors shall be provided for the fou: qara?•.s
facing Webster Avenue and that sczeen-type landscaping sha11 be oro~:ided aojoce.rt to .hr:
two o~en parking spaces to the east of the ca:port bays, as sti}.ulated to ny the c~;it.ions:,
THE FOREGOING RENLUTI01! is signed o;id approve~ by ~ne this 2^th d3y o: '~b.srr.h, :?r,?.
ATTESTs
; _~ ~~•~~::.,
_ SEC.REI'AP,Y ANAHEIM CI ; Y PLAtdfJI MG COMN~I SSION
SI'ATE OF CALIf~RNlA )
OJUIJTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
C,:,G~ru~. 7~. /'/D
CHAIRhSAN AblAHEIh'~, CI'-i~Y p-LAIJN-- 1~~Ct~N;!J,i' :0;~;
~
? Ann Krebs, Secretary of th? C?ty Planning Commission of th~ City oP ,^•.n;heim, do
heri~by c~:rtify that the r'oreyoing resolution •~as pz;r~: ; and aoopted ot a mc~:~-tin~~ o.` th~.
City Planning Commission of the City of Ar,aheirn, he1C cn h1arch 10, 19h9, a: 2:J^ C'.;o..~.; p„r;;~,
by the folloNing vote o.< the membFrs thereof:
AYGS: COh4J~I5SI0NERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer~ Herr.~~t, ko~riland, Thom.
.lOES: CO~J,MISS10IdERSs Farano.
ABSEfJTs OJNdJ;ISSI0NER5: ~Jone.
TN YJITNESS WHEREOF, I hav? hereunto set my h~nJ this 20th •iay of Marc.h, :;~09.
Res. tdo. .~4
~l Z
~' • A
ij ~
~~ ~ - ,. .- ./~~.~ C c_i
SECRE'ARY A;1A!~~IM CITY PLP.'C~Ji~~G N~l,IJ,I55i0~~
~