PC 69-75_,; ~ _ . _
i
RESOLU710N NO. PC69-75
~', A REStN•IITIdl1 OF'fHE Ci'iy PLAM~!@1G COlO(ISS(pN OF THE CITY OF ANA}{E~I
1lECOi91[NOQ~G TO'IHt CITy C~1CII. OF THE CITY OF AHAHE111 Tyl-~'
P~T1T~ ~'dR RECLA3f~1CATi0N }~p. 68-69-81 BE DISAPPROYED
~i 1YH~REAS, tbe City Pl~nnln6 Coaiuion oE the Cltr c~( M~yei~ did receive a verdq~d petj~~ for Re-
.T cla~eificMioe [w~ TAYLOR-DUNN AIANUFACfURING ~MpqldY, 2114 West Ball Road, Anaheim, California
92804, Owner of certain real property Situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of'California, described as Lot Nos. 4 and 5 of Tract No. 162.
~ : ; ~nd
,' NHIEREAS, the City P1~neia~ Co~1u~ ~d y~~ ~ w~~ ~o~ ~~ Clty Hdl L tM Cltr At M~heim
r on Apri 1 7, 1969, ~t 7: 30 o'clock P.Y. cotlc~ o( ~N~ puWic M~rfa~ I~~ria8 M~ d~ly Zlr~a sa rprind by
_ l~w ~nd i~ r'!'a,~-ee witY the p~ori~io`~ o( tY~ M4e1~ Yre1
~vid~nce tar ~~~in~t ~~id prop~ nel~ssipc~tima aN to inwsdptC ~~dioi [fndin 21 ~y~r ~d coniider '
i
in coanection tM~rewith; Md t~ ~K'o~wwd~tiona ,
~ MHEREAS, •dd Connelubn, ~Etsr dw i~~ctioa, l~vNdptlo~, ~~tudy ~si~ by it~elt ~ i~ it~ ba '
h~![, ~nd ~(tK ~w cauidK~tloa ot ~ll rliwe~ ~ r~(~ o[(a+d ~t ~ud M~rinR~ /oe~ (ind ~sd wter~ln~ the
followin~ f~cts: ~
~ ~
1. 'i'h~t th~ petitloaer P~~ ~ ncladfic~tiw o( t!w ~k~ve dNCribed propertY Im~ tha R-A, Agr i cu ltura l, ~
Zone for Lot 4 of Tract No. 162, and C-1~ General Commercial, Zone of Lot 5 of Tract ~!o.
~ 162 to the M-1, Light Industria~, Zone. J
2. That the proposed reciassification request for M-1 zoning on subject aroperty
is not consi,tent with the land use policies established for this area on the Anaheim
~ General Plan.
3. I'hat the Commission deems tnat ir:jection of indu,trial zoninq in an area primarily ~
developed for commercial and residertial purposes, would establish an undesirable precedent ;
for similar requests throughout the City and therefore, recommends the request for M-1
zoning be disappro•red. ~
4. That the Commission further finds that the existing use had been established
prior to the annexation of subject and abutting properties into the City of Anaheim and
~ ~ that the nature of this specific existing manufacturing use issuch that it has not been
I
incompatible with other uses in the surrounding arca; that since no changes are propo~ed
~ in the nature of the manufacturing activity, the expansion of tf~is non-conforming use
~~rould not be detrimental to the surrounding area and the use could be expanded in a
commercial zone comparable to the zoning established on other ~
area, and therefore the Commissien recommends that Lot 4 of TractctJos 162tbesremlassified
to the C-1, Zone.
5. ihat the proPosed roclassification of subject prop~rty, as approved, i~ necessary
ar.d/or dc~irable for the ord~rly and proper development of the corimun_±y.
6. That the proposed reclassificat~on of subject property, as approved, dces not
't require dedication, but does require imorovement of abuttiny •,treets in accordance~-i±y
the Circulation Element of the Genera] Plan, due to the antici~,;ted inc:ease in traffic
, ,c+ which ~vill be generated by the intensification of land use.
~,~ 7. That no one appeared in opposition to the proposed reclassification.
.~x
J
,;~~
RD ~
-i- 1
~
- -^~: •.~y "'~.~
a . ~ 9
i ~`_~.
Y S
i Y
~
~~W~ THEREf•URg~ gr I; h~~pL~~~p that the Anaheim Cit•~ n'anning Commissicn coes hPreby
:ecommend to the City Coun~_1 of the Cit}~ of Hnjheim tha: ;;u;, E~~ p.
for ~d-i, Zone be denied on tha basis of the a~orem~=ntion~~ ~ indir.us.
J ctition :oi Recla~si:i~ation
BE IT FURTHER RE9JLVED tnat the City P~anning Commission does he:Fby recommend to the
City Council of the City of Anaheim that subjFCt i~ntition for Reclassi;i_ation be a
for C-1, Zone on the ba~is of the a.°orementioned rindings and, b +
Zoning of the Anaheim M,unici a1 Coda PProvFd
the R-A P b~- amendt=d t:~ H Y~o coing, that Titi: 18-
, Zone and to incorporate said descr;bed nruperty~in{octhe~C~lu~~c`ibed prope:ty :rnm
Tract No. 162, subject to the fo~lov;ing condit?onc rr}::ch are hereby found to Le a nec~ sary
prerequicite to the pro o= r Zone on Lot PJo. , ~,
general welfare of the CitizenseoffthebCitv r-c?~rty in order to oreserve the safety and
1. Tha', street improvemc-nt rlans sha:' be~prepare~ and all enginee:ing reGui:e:nents of
the City of Anaheim along Ball Road,
paving, drainage faciliti suct .:urbs and gutters, ~;d~~,valks, street
City Engineer and in acco dan~e withrstaF r`nant :vork shali be completed as r... ~''a°1~iO anc
of th2 Cit -= plans ar.d soecificatior,s on ~1jE 'tU1rEd b~ the
y Enginee:; and that a bond ir ,i~ramount ar.d {o;m satisfactory to the City~of l~e
Anaheim yhall be posted with the Cit to
qui:ements. Y 9uarantee the installation of said engir,~ering TE_
2• I'hat the owner oi subject property shall pa~ to the City of Anaheir,n the Sum of $2,~0
per front foot alonc Bail Road, for strr.et :iGhtina purr.:oses.
3• 7hat the o~nner of subjPr.t propPrt•~
per front :oot alung Ball Road, ror ~rep > shali pay to the Cit, of Anaheim the sum of :5Q
4. That trash storaoe areas shall belprovidedUin~aesordance with approved plans on f'ilo
:vith the office oi the Director o.' Public Works,
5. That fire hydrants shall be
the Chief of the Fire Denartment, installed as :equired and ~etermined to be nec ~
6• That a 6-{oot mason_ nal; ~~a=y by
lines. ~y sha11 be constructed along the east and south property
~• That any air-conditioning ta~ilities oro o~.
and the sound snall be buffer?d frpm a~'acent ~' s_d shal: be oro erl r:
8. ~ =esidentiai homes, p Y shielded um vieu:,
That any parkinq area liqhtinc shall be liohted w?th down-iighting a maximum 6-feet
ir, height and shall be dir~cted away fram the nroperty lin ~; to pro± r
integrity of the area.
9. That Condition PJo~, e_t the residential
period of 180 days from the date~hereof3~oTbove mentioned, ,hall be complied with within a
1~. That Condition Nos. -1, g~ 6 such urthe: time as the City Gour.cil ma
to final building and zo~ing °~spECtior,~,~nd b, above mention?d, shal] h~ complicd withrprior
THE FUREGOIiJG fiE3JLUTIp;J is sior.ed and
P,YESs COMMISSIO;JERS:
~ptS~ COh'JdI SSIO~dERS:
ABSE(a7: QJNNISSIOWERS:
IN WIT~JESS WHERB~E 1 ha
ATTg~';
SECRETARY A~lAHEIN, CI7'f PI_Al~;~r';~ ~~'MISSIG~J
ar.prov~~d by mr ;,h;s 1?th day of Aprii, 196~~.
-~- ~ - )~~ i: ~.~
l HGiplrnl •R '~ ^t
_..•••'• ^" ^;~n: ~=lrf ~.1 1 Y PLAhJF1I fJ3 QJNf'I SSION
STAIE OF CALII~ kNIA )
QJUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF A.VAIiEIN )
I, Ann K.rebs, Secrrtary of ~he City Planninq Commission ot the Cit~
he: eby ~?rtify that the : oreg g esolution ~n ~,
Planning Commission of the C9oin tr ~ of Anaheim, do
s f-~~s~~ed and adopted a`, a meetin, of the City
~~y the follov:ing vote of y~ Anahei~, held on April '7, 1u69, at 7c3p ~~~
the memburs thereo!s lock p,N,~
fdon A.
h°'PUnto set my hana thi<, 1'th day ot Apr.il, 1969.
Alired, Ca~ip~ parano. Gauer, .
';on~. Herbst, kov„and, Thor.
SECRETARy ANAHEIN, CITY PLAUtdI1JG Q~MNISSION
~ '
~x
Res. TJo. ~~g
~~.. _ R_.