PC 70-129e
RESOLUTION NO. PC70-129
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~~F THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2185 gg GRANTED IN PART
WHEREAS, the City Plonning Commistion of the Clty oE Anaheim did receive a verlfied PetitIon fo: Veriance from
HOWARD W. UNKREY, 3361 Quartz Lane, F-3, Fullerton, Califorria 92631, Owner; NAROLD V. TOLAR,
1405 Scarborough Lana, Anaheim, California 92804, Agent of certain real property situated in
, the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, desrribed as that portion of the
Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Secticn 17, Township 4 South, Range 10 Ulest,
;j ~~~' in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as per Map record~d in Book 51, Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in
:r the offic.e of the County Recorder of said county. Beginning a~ the intersection of the East-
;~ , erly prolongation of the Southerly line oi Lot 76 of Tract No. 2402, as per Map recorded in
,~ ; Book 7g, Pages 3~, 38, and 39, 1liscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of
~ ~' said county, with the centerlinfr of Euclid Avenue as shown on said map and ru~ning thence
:j Southerly along saio centerlint• 166 feet to a point; thence Westerly parallel ~vith the South-
erly line of said Lot ~u to a ooint in the Easterly line of said Tract P7o. 2402, thence
~ Idortherly along said Easterly lina to the Southwesterly corner o{ said Lot 76; thence East-
.~ erly along the So~therly line cf said lot and the Easterly prolongation thereof to the point
'~, of begir,ning. EXGEPT the 5outherly 66 feet.
`I
~+i
i)
~I
~~
!~
E~ ~HEREAS, the City Planning Commieeion dld hold • public hearing et the Clty Hall in the Ctty of Aneheim on
'r July 13, 1970, at 2:00 o'clock P,M., notice of seid publie heering heving been duly given es requlred by
~, lew end in eccecdence withthe provisIona of the Anoheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidenee tor
~f~' end agalnet said proposed vorience end to inveatlQate end make findings and recommendedons ln connection therewlth;
` ~ . and
WHERF.AS, said Commisslon, after due inspectlon, lnvestlgatton, and study mede by itself ond In its behalf,
and e(tec due consldetation ot ell evldence otfd repoRs offered at eald hearing, does find end detertnine the following
fects:
~ 1. That the petltioner requeste e varianee [rom the Anehelm Municipal Code , as *o] :ows, to es tabl isfi a
real estate office in a residential structu:F;
~ 1. SfCTI0t1 ]8.40.070(i~) - Reuuired b-foot r~iasonrv wall. (5-foot well proposed).
I
?. S[CTIOP: i9.40.059~ - Code requirement that a11 -~a-kinn ~h~ll be orovided
~ to tre rear ot the commercially used r~sider~ia]
stsucture. (Parking is proposed in the required
I• side yard of the structure).
~• 2. Thia` the petitioner sr.thdr~aw his reque,t to viaive the reyuired 6-foot masonry v,~al]
~
'• and stirulated to prov:oino said wall by lncreasing tf;e height of the existin~ wall.
3. 7hat qranting of v,aiver of providing ~arkinq to the rear of the structure, is hereby
~ grant~d for a~erioJ of thrce yea:s or until sucf~ time as adjar_ent parcels consioered in
~L Area Dc:velopment iian tvo. 95 devel~p and are requirr-d to ~mprove the alley.
; ;; 4. That there arca exceptional o_ ertraordinary circumstances or conditions ~c~~~licab:e to
~ ':~ tf,e propErty ~nvoived or to the intended use of the ~~roperty that. ~o not apply neneraliy to
i~,; thn property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
! 5. Th~t: tf~c reque,ted va:iance is necessary !o: t.he oreservation and enjoy:nent of :,
I' ! substantial prop~~ly rignt pos,essed by othe: property in the same vicinity and zcne, and
,;,;j denied to the proner?y ~n question.
. z 6. "lhat th~ requested vatiance will not be materially detrim?ntal to the public welfare
' or injurious to the p:operty v* improvements in ~uch vicinity and zone in which the property
S~`' is located.
~.c
,tl ~. Tr~at 4 persons appeared :epresentinn 9 ~ersons nresent in the Council Chamber, and a
'~; #I petition signed by 25 persons, in opposition t.o the requirement of an elley to the rear of
subject property.
.~
.i ' ~ ,
.I ~ . V1-D
.t~ ~1~
: __ . _ !
_
__ ....
S ,
~ ~
~ in part
i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVCD that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grent/subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
' posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That this variance is 9ranted subject to the completion of Reclassification No.
- 70-71-3.
2. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west property line, as
stipulated to by the petitioner, and shall be completed prior to issuance of a business
license for the operation of the use.
3. That a time limitation of three years shall be granted for the use of the existing
:` residential structure and parking plan, and upon request by the petitioner, an additional
~: ~- year may be granted, if approved by the Planning Commission and/or City Council.
.~.:.~ 4. That subject prnperty shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
'~ti~~~ specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, provided that
~ necessary .revisions are made to comply with Area Development Plan No. 95.
._I~ ~
i'
.I,
i'
.`~
~
~" I;
,,~ I1
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 23rd day of July, 1970.
_.`'t I /
~ / / ~ ~
~CH A4AN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
1~
~ ~ ~J
_ /~YL22i . ~C/'/~v/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CA[.IFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
I CITY OF ANAHEIM )
. I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify th~: the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted a! a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
`. Ju 1 13 1970
~ . Y e ~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote af the members thereof:
! AYES: COMMISSIONERS: A11red, Farano, Gauer, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour, Herbst.
~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
I ABSCNT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
I
IN IVITNESS WHEP.EOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of July, 1970.
~~l Z-%''L-~~L, ~~/
~' ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ RESOLUTION NO. 129
~: ~ ~ ; V2-G 2
~
F~: .t~
,y ~
. }.::; _
~