PC 70-139i~~flL[~TIO~I N0. i ^~u..134
~'------._......~. ._._..
A RESOLi1TI0N Or THE CITY YLANNING ~;OfdMtSSTON OF Ti~ CITy OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMF~ND1vG ?'0 THE CZ4'Y COI];JCIL A~'NQMEIV7•. TO RESOLUTION
N0. PC70-130 APPROVING ARF';~ B~'VELOPt~NT PL;N N0. 95
WHEREAS, the City Planning Com¢;~~ion uf the wity of Anaheim on July 13, 1970,
in R~solution No. PC70_130 recommend~d a;Pr~'~'~~. of Area Development Plan No. 95,
subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, Condition No. 1 of the a.°urement,ionud resolution required '"That a
standard 20-foot alley be providAd and dedicatea '~e the City of Anaheim, to i;ne
rear of all subject properties as they devslon a:cr :,ommercial or commerciel-
.,-:~'t;~ professional uses ... ~~; however, the resolution recommendin a
' reclassification of a B pproval of the
;~ ~ Portion of the property encompassed in the area develapment
plan prohibited access to the proposed alley from the residentiel properties to
the west, in order that the amount of vehicular traffic using the alley may be
I kept to a minimum, since the alley will empty only onto Euclid Street; and
i VVF~REAS, the City Attorney's Office is of the opinion that access to a dedicated
public alley may not be prohibited in this manner; and
~
WHEREAS, the Commission does determine that in lisu of a dedicated, 2U-foot Kide
! elley along the westerly boundary of those
parcels included in Area Development Plan
~ No. 95, it would be more desirable to develop a systsm of 20-foot wide rivate
i vehicular accessways for all of the affected parcels; and that each
' affected would be required to exchange mutual vehicular easement rightsPwith othe^
~ rsffected property owners, as necessary as the various parcels develop for commercial
~ use, and that said easement~ would bs ~eoorded.
~
NOW, THERFr02'W, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim
does hereby recommand to the Citv Council of the City of Anaheim that Resolution
No. PC7G-13G be amended as follows c:~ the basis of the foregoing findings:
1. That the owners of a11 affected parcals shall provicty q 70-foot wide vehicular
accessway alor& the west boundaries of said parcel;, and 20-foot wide vehicular
acoess returns to Euclid Sti~eet, as necessary, as the parcels are proposed for
commerciel development cr upon dem~nd by the City; and tha.t only three (3)
permanent rivate vehicular accessway returns be permitted to Euclid Street,
to lessen the vehicular movements onto this stre~t; that the locations shown
on Exhibit "A" are suggestions; that final vohicu:ar accAS:a~ay return loca-
tions shall be sub,jeot to the approval of the Development Services Department
and the Traffic Engineer as the property develops and said re~turns shall be
installed upon demand by the City; and that mutual easement rights to and
over seid vehicular nccessways shall be granted to and exchar,ged by all
Pr~perty owners covered in Area Development Plsn No. 95 upon demand by the
City, said ?asement ;~;.;~,;,ts shall be submitted to and approved by t:~e City
Attorne;~ and then be rac:nrded with the Orange County Recorder.
2. T:;at the r~quired private vehicular accessways shal.l be peved in acoordance
with the require~~nts ct th~ Director of Public Works.
3. That a 6-foot maso~ry wall shall be cc~nstructed along the west sida of the
20-fcot wide north~•;~.ouih acaessway r~equired along all properties encompassod
in tlia area developmont plan.
4. That vehicular access rights, except at street and/or elley openings ta
Eu,~id Straet shall 'oe dedicated to the City of Anaheim provided, however,
tb.at temporary access to Fuclid Street from the individuel parcels included
withi.n Area Development Plan ":~, 95 shall be allowed until such time as the
City demands improvemer,', nf ~_,:~ required private vehicular accessways and,
further provided, that t~ie .r,~'~viduel property owners shsl.l enter in+,o an
agreement with the City of Ana~haim to close the tcmpo^ary accessways t`~,at
are not in conformance with the la:ation af the three permanent aocoss
returns that are doemed. necessary by the Develcpment Ser•vices Department
and the TrafPic Engineer, and lnndsce~e that porticn of the temporary
accessway lyir.g within the front setback, s~id agreement shall be recorded
with the Orange County Recorder prior to the issuance of a building permit
on an individual pBrcel.
.=x
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIQN is ~igned and approved by me this 6th day of August,
1970.
/~, / _-l
~ ~/" -- j
. ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~
. - --- "~~ ANAE~~ CITY PLANNIIJG COt~RdIS5I0N
,..~~ ATTEST:
,`
~.{ ~ / /
, i iL=:~~2'- '~' l~zi,
SECREP,9Ry ~p~ ~ITy p~NING ('•"v1~dE~S5I0N
I
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
: i COUNTy OF ORANGE ? ss.
~ CITY OF ANAf~IM )
~.
~ I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
~1 do hereby c~rrtify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting
~ of the City Planning Commission of the City oF Aneheim, held on July 27, 1970,
~,~ at 2:00 o'clook P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
~ I AYES: COI~dISS20NERS: Farano, Gauer, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour, Herbst.
~ NOES: COMMISSIONEAS: None.
ABSENT: CONIDdISSIONERS: Allred.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I li¢ve hereunto set my hand this 6+,h day of August, 1970.
;I
t " / -l~~J-L.~l, ~i~)"L../ L'~.~--
,, 3ECRETARY ANAf~IM CTTY PLANNING COER~AISSION
'~ ~
; li
I ~
. ( • hi
, I ~ .
;j
y
;~
,
.,
,~ j Res. No. PC70-139
~ `~ I
~i
i ~
1
(