PC 70-164RESOLUTION N0. PC70-164
A RESOLUTION OF Tf3E CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR !/ARIANCE NO. 2198 gE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Aneheim did receive e verified Petition for Variance from
BANK OF AMERICA UT & SA, BY CONTINENTAL SERVICE COMPANY, 1335 South G•rand Avenue, Los Angeles,
California 90015, Owrer; FEDERAL SIGN AND SIGNAL CORPORATION, 1100 North Main Street, Los
Angeles, California 90012, pgent of ce,-tain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
Co~~nty of Orange, State of California,described as Lot Nfls. 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Regier Sub-
;;; division recorded in Book 6, Page 37 of Miscellaneous Maps, and Lot Plos. a, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13
>;, and 14 of Davis Brothers aodition to Anaheim in Block C, recorded in Book 1, Pages 19 and
20 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles.
~
WHEREA.i, the City plonning Commisston did hold a public heedng et the City liell in the City of Anal:cim oa
September 10, 1970, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notIce of seid public hearing t,eving been duly givm es required by
law endln eccordence alththe provisiona of the Aneheim Munlclpel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end coneider evidence for
end egainst said propoaed varience and to investiQete end meke Eindings end recommendetions in connection therewith;
and
VlHEREAS, sald CommIssion, efter due inspe~tion, investlgeUon, end study made by itself end in ita beha;E,
end efter due consideration of ell evidencn and reporte offered at seid hearing, does find and detecmine the foltowing
fects;
1. That the petitioner requeats e veriance from the Aneheim Municlpal Code as follows, to establish
two free-standing signs on subject property:
SECTION 18.62.080(B) -~pe of siqns permitted. (Free-standing signs are
not permitted in the C-0, Commercial Office, Zone;
two free-standing signs proposed).
2. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property involved or io the intended use ef the property th~t do not apply eenerally
to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
3. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
sutstantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
:enied to the property in question.
4. That the height and size of the structure is adequate to serve as its own advertising,
and that wall and roof signs would be permitted by the Sign Ordinance which would suffice
to direct any stranger to the building location.
5. That the petitioner has not demonstrated a need exists for the establishment of these
free-standing signs, and that the ~u~lding would be a landmark in the City of Anaheim, and
would therefore need no additional advertising.
6. That the granting of subject petition would be granting a privilege to the petitioner
which was not enjoyed by other commercial office zoned structures.
" i > Vl-D
.~ -1-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subJect
Petition for Varience on the besis of the eforementIoned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 17th day of September, 1970.
~ r
.~<< , - ~~,~
- CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
4 COUI~TY OF ORANGE ) ss.
j CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~ I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of AneheIm, do hereby certiEy thet the fore-
going resolution was pessed end adopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commission ofthe City of Aneheim, held on
I September 10, 1970, dt Z:00 o'clock p,M,~ by the fo:lowing vote of the members thereof:
I~
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour, Herbst.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
~, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
ji IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 17th day of Septemter~ 1970.
I
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 164
~
~ V2-D _2_
~. ~
~~ ` ~
~.,~ ~