PC 70-170~- . _ _
RESOL•UTION NO
PC70-170
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO T}iE CITY COUNCIL OF ~jiE CIi}( OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~ ~ HE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a vecified Petition for Reclassifice-
tion from HEIRS OF LQJA W:6E, % BANK OF AMERICA, TRUST DEPARTMENT, 801 No:th Main, Santa Ana,
California 92701, Owners; STANLEY E. IIELL, 9'776 Katella, Anaheim, California 92804, ~gent of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orar.;s, State of California,
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to he*ein as though set forth in full.
; end
, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a publtc hearing et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
September 10~ 1970~ at'7:30o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given es required by
lew and In accordence with the provislons of the Anaheim Alunicipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to heat end con,ider evidence
' (or end egeinst seid proposed reclassificetion end to investigete and meke findings end recommendetions In connectton
therewith; end
1VHEREAS, s9id Commission, eEter due inspection, investigetion, and study mede by itself and in its behelE, end
efter due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered et seid hearing, does find end determine the Eollowing fecta:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a reelessificetion of the above described property from the R-A~ Agricultura 1~
Zone to the R-3, Multiple-Family Residential, Zone.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in confarmance with the General ~lan and
land uses established in this general area.
3. Thet the proposed reclesslficetion of subject property is aecessery and/or desireble (or thP orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
4. Thet the proposed reclasslficetion oE subject property does properly relale to the zones end their permitted
uses locelly established in close proximity to subject property end to the zones and their permitted uses generally esteb-
Iished throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication and
improvement of abuttinq streets in accordance with the Circul.ation Element of the Generai
Plan, due to the anticipated increase in ttaffic which will be generated by the intensi-
fica~ion of land use.
6. That one person appeared, representing six persons present in the Council Chamber,
expressing concern that inadequzte parking was being prooosed.
R-A -1-
_ ,, .:, ,. ,~,.
• _ ,.. ~...~...~.,.-~.:~., --.
. .. ~ -
-~ •--
.
( ~' - '~ ~ ~~
' ' ' ~:
! `` "-; ~ • 'i ~-._~~\ SCCi.J.` .. I Y TITL` INSURAt .~!~E COM--~A~;`,'
,__ :.
~~C.~u~TY a» N011:M, YTOADW~Y. /.O. UOX ip0. SANTA ANA. CALI/011HIA ~3701 • D~7•7]]1
717LY '
.,
r~~~.r~7t`Yarz~ rt~ror~T
. .,
, .
I~ ~ ~ . ~ - -- _
, . . ~ . ~ . . ~ . .. __ _ -. ~ ;1 ,-ri-,
' . 3anl: o: Merica ~ - - _ 1' ~~~? ''
. 801 ;JOrtn ;4ain Streot ~ ~ ,. '
. Santn Ana, Califarnia ~2?02;~ ' ~
. .
Your No.
Attcntion: • Our n'o. i~•'ie;tc
Lo13 Scott y52;~32_~Ap
;~`'
{ *
.i
:~
Datcd as of- ~,+n~ ?~,.y ]9~II ac 7:30 A.M.' . ~
r . ~ '~~ .... N. ~~.~.~ r,1 .. ~ ' .
. Tlie lan.i refcrred to in sliis rcport is situatcd in thc Statc of Californin, County of dra~~~,y .
and is .:escribo~i ~~ f~lio~rs: '
S.. - - -
-+ J~'•e:+ ~~ +%~S'; G~ thC i:01 ~t'ii.CEi. corncr Gr ~}lC t:IC~'i, ^ ~' ~•' `
hali' o~ ~ne ,~o:,,,zer~c e~~:;,er
. Or tti1i; ::0:`~11't:C3v quartcr Or aCCL'ZO~t 2~.~ ~Ql9i"iS11:.7 1~ uOU~:)~ Rrr.;;e :fl `~7~?:~i:y
.C.~:,~1 ~C: f^ i C::.310 L~A~C £.Y1G ~:t?: ~dian, y71(~ : Ul^il~i:t ~'OT~1 II~1i(3 pOi:: ~
~ ~f:~t.UJ n'
~~:i:`.~
`v::t.'I:Cc: vCLli.}l Q° ZjY 3~~~ 1'.IIE~ ~iJ9,OlU .CC~~ :.titC11CC $OUth ~i~~ 25~ ~i~~ :~~:.^,~`.
2i;1;,CG :~~ec Lo tne ;~le3t liile o^ L•he 41est- half of•thc 1lorther:.L• ~~uar;er o~
~I;C 2:G: ~:;ilC~t CjUal'tCY` OP ~aid Scc~i071 21~ aiu7 thence P:ortn 0° l~i 3~~~
1•;e:,t alori~ sa;d Z.'e~t linc, 451.00 Peet ~o thn. point of be~,ir,ni7~.
~XCiiPi.~*;G ;iii:RcFi~0t3 the :o,llowin~: ~
1~.C,'.,iY~:.f7:j; At L':1Cf ?~O=thL•:@St COI•1'1CT~ oi' the ;lorthc.~ast qu<r~cr Oi ~;1C i;G: ~:~-
:'~~J.^.`u Cl:.^~1'i.G'1' Or $CC.`.ZOY: 21~ lOZ•:r.ship 1i SOUZ'.Il~ R2,'~11T,C 1~ t'lCS~~ .c:~~: 1)i:~:l;;~~i~~~p
il:=~@ :t ~(~ ~.CX'~(:181'1~ runnin,, S'.r1C1"iCc: $0111:~1 Q~ 13' 3~1~~ I:a3t .k59.0~ iGL'~`, i:i0i1^
• '„}:C 1'iu~i; 3.~21C Of ;,23.C1 T:Ql-the4sl: (jUr3itC'T'~ ~'i}1~1~CC tdorth ~~~ 2)i :.f~~ ...:::a'i. ~
<i>>~•0"v :eet p~ral2el : h ilne of said 1SorL•h ~ • ~
to ~nc 10, t eaat ~ua. ~cr ~:,enc~
:+or~n 0° i3' 30" Tiw,t 96.00 rcetz par211e1 Lo aaid Z9e:,t 1lne o° ~; :ri
i:0:~:1°i :~`. Qii3:'CC2`i the:~ce $Oll.~ltl i5~~ ~2~J~ ~.J~~ ~'10IIt Z20~~~ iCE~`. 7::aa~...~.1C1 ~~
s~~c: ~dr~r~:~ 1i:,e; ~nence ~orth 0° 13' ;0" East 363.~4 Feeti parallci ~o saSd
. :1~~e~t lir.e to a po:.r~~ iri ~he ~aid :~ort}~ li~o rind thence South &9° 30~ i5n
IiCJ1r i64.00 fee~ to ~he point or be~;inning. '
, cXC:::I:;C ALSO the 1•Jor~h 30 fee~. . ~
ii0'~ ': SaS,d~°land iu deserlbQd on ~he Coi:r.~y Tax Ausessr~ent Roll for ~he
fs:.cal yeAr 19G9-7~ a~ A. p. No. 129-171-2; CA z-o22.
. .
Qg1G17/~~ • ~ ' ~
' y6~ `'» ~iv -' i. , '
t,~ . ~, .. , . ,
~' G.I; ~; 157~ ' `~ • . ..
,:; r,~c~~•;~o ;., ' .~ . •
~ 'l::r:i7:f. ~ . ~ y . ' ~( ( 'IJJ. I~U'. V / ~ ~
~ t`, J~ViL~GY L' . ~i1 V V~..~ ~_~~ .......~~~.~._,:• u
~J
c~' ~ s. _; ~ ~; ~"L ~b . . . .
aq1C.C (C 5.1 • ~ ~ ' . .
CL'iA -roi~mmary Aopotl 7otm 01 ~- ~. ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~
• n
~ -• _ . ~ '-'^~.~.
' "• ., '.. . ~detirc,. --
i' ~~'
~~
~y ~
~ i
~
~
I,
~
N~W. THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED thot the Aneheim City Plannlag Commission does hereby reeommmd
to the City Council of the City of AneheIm thot eubJect petitlon for Reelaseificalion be approved end, by ao doing,
thet TlUe 1&Zoning of the Aneh~im Municipel Code be amended to exclude the above deecribed property from the
R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the R-3, Multiple-
Family Residential, Zone, upon the following conditions wh'.ch are he:eby found to be a
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the
safety and 9eneral welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That the owner oi subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of lanci
53 feet in width from the centerline of the street a?~nq Ball Road, for street widening
purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road includino
preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and
gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainagz facilities, or other appurtenant worN
shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans
anci specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street lighting facil~iies
along Ball Road shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in
accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of
Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
shail be posted with the City to guarantee the installation ef the above mentioned require-
ments.
3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15~
per front foot along Ball Road, for tree planting purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants s;iall be installed as required and determined to be necessary b~~
the Chief of the Fire Department.
6. That a f+-foot masonry wall shall be canstructed along the south property line.
7. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the
sound buffered from adjacent residential uses.
8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
9. That the owner of subject oroperty shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $75
per multiple-family unit, to be used for oark and recreatiun purposes, said amount to be oaid
at the time the buildina oermit is i sued.
10. Prior to the introduction o~ an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition ;Jc.<..
1, 2y and 3, above mentioned, shall be comoleted. The provisions or rights granted by this
resolution shall become null and void by ac*ion of the City Council unless said conditions
are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City
Council may grant.
to fin~l.1 bThat1dCondaitior. Nos. 4, 5, 6~ 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior
'fHE~OR~G~ING RESQ~I.UTI~Nis s~g a"a~a a
pproved by me this 17th day of September, 1970.
.~ ~ ~_/`
. ~- ~
~~' ~~ ~`t_-" ~~ I % ~Q' yi J/
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAfiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CAi.iFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City o( Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was pessed aad edopted et e meeting of the City Plenning Commission ot tfie City of Aneheim,
held on September 10~ 1970, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Kay~vood, Herbst.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: vcne.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONEFS: Allred, Rowland.
AffiTAIN: COMNISSIONERS: Seymour.
IN WITNESS WyEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 17th day Of September~ 1970.
~, I SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
,,~ I RESOLUTION N0. 170
r
R2-A
~ r "2'
I
~
~ _- . ... . __..~;-=r=7=~------~---.. .T_..__ ~ --
. -_ - '~,_ _-~yST ~?- . m..~.