PC 70-230.~ ~ }
RESOLUTION N0. PC70-230
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMAiISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIhi
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2223 _ BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission oE the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition (or yariance
from CHESTER C, KARSON, 2251 Coronet Avenue, Anahein, California 92801, Owner of certain real
property situat2d in the Ci.ty of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
as Lot ho. 72 of Tract No. 2659.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City ot Anaheim
on ~~ecember 28, 1970, at 2:00 .~'doc4 P.M., notice of said public hearing having b~en duly given as required
° by law and in accordance with the pro iisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18,68, to hear and consider
,s~evidenc~a [or and against said proposed varience and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connec-
:; tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissi~n, efter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behel(,
;• and after due consideration of all evidence and reparts offered at seid hearing, does find and dQtermine the following
' facts:
1. That the petitioner reouests a veriance irom the Aneheim Municipel Code as follov~,: to const.ruct a
~ >winu;:ing pool v:ithin i;v~o feet of the side lot line on subject propert~:
Sf_CTI06~ 18.24.030~b-2) - Minimum reauired side vard s~thack.
2. That them are exceptional or extrnordinary circumstonces or conditions app~icable to the ptoperty involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply genernlly to the property or class of use in the same vicinity
'and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary (or the preservation and enjoyment af a substantial pcopecty right
,possessed by olhec prope~ty in the some vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will nat be materially detrimentel to thc public welfare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in sucfi vicinity and zone in which the property is loceted.
F.~~
~ `
i
ra
,~~ _
~' ~ *
„~. V 1-G
,
~;
I
~r
~ .., ...
~ - "'
-1-
r.
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that ihe Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be e necessary prereguisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare oEthe Citizens of the ~ity of
Anaheim.
1. That a 6-foot nasonry Wall shall be constructed along the westerly
property line, and that sufFicient means, acceptable to the Building
Division, shall be employed to preclude the drainage of water from sub~ect
property onto the ad~oining property.
2. That sub~ect property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Exhibit No. 1.
3. That Condi[ion Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 7th day of January, 1971.
e.
G ~
E
.a
f~ ~
i~ ~
~ i .~x
ATTEST:
\-~ . ~
-Y ~~ ^-~ =, '~ /
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIh1 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~~ z.-,.r ~'~1 ~ , LG,
SECRETARY ANANEiht CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
, STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
i COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
I CITY OF ANAHE;M )
I [, Ann Krebs , Secretary o( the City Plenning Commission ot the City of 4neheim, do hereby certi(y thnt the fore-
~ going resolution wns passed end adapted at a meeting of ti~e City Planninq Ccmmission o( the Cfty of Anaheim, held on
December 28, 1971, at 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote of th~ members therco(:
AYES: COMh11SS10NERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMiSSIONERS: Farano.
IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, I have hereuntc set my hend this 7th day of January, 1971.
RESOLUTION NO. 230
V2- ,
(
~
V
~~>~ -72 ~ ~,'.~~ ~,~
SECRETARY ANI,HEIM CITY Pl ::::~!tNG COMM1SS10N
-Z-
E