PC 70-56..,
RESOLUTION N0. P~~~`56
A RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECqA{MENDING TO T}[g CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69-70-49
--~-~BE DISAPpROVED
WIiEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the Cit
classification from ALLAN qNp ppRq KEY Y of Maheim did receive a verified Petition for Re-
PHILLIPS, 912 South State College Blvdoo HEN!?y State Colle
Blvd., and ROBERT 9e Blvd., WILLIAM AND I1EL[N
AND LORETTA HOCKENBERRY '~D MILDRC-D GUZIEJKA, 909 South State College
California 92806, Owners; YOUNG REAL FSTATE COMPANythq35a~e College Boulevard
Anaheim, California 928p6, qgent of certain real ' ortti State Col:ege 9oulev~ard,
County of Orange, State of California Property situated in the y
2350, , described Lot fJos. 87, 8gy g9~ and qpt of Anaheim,
of Tract tdo.
WHEREAS, the Cit Pl : e~d
on April 6~ 1970 y ~^ning Commission did hald a public hearing at the Cit
law end in accordance with the pco~~ ~0 5 of thace of seid public hearin Y Nall in the City of Anaheim
evidence for and egainst said ~aheim Municipal Codeh Choptere18a72Y g1Ven as required by
in connection therewith; and ProPosed reclassi[ication and to investigate andmake (indings andhecommendati ns
WHEREAg, said Commission, e[ter due inspection, investig9tlon, end stud
half, and a[ter due consideretion of a1l evidence and reports offered at said hearin
fo11oW~~g (acts: Y made by itself and in its be-
g, does find and determine the
1• That the petitioner proposes e reclassification of the above described property f:om the R-I
Family Residential, Zone to
hood commercia] sho the C-1, General Commercial, Zone to establish a neOg~~bor-
Pping structure on the northerly three parcels of subject pro ert
2. That the scope of the proposed reclassification, i{ a
an amendment to the General Plan at the P Y'
General Plan symbol will be considered atrthennextmannu~aler~~~eWroved, does not warrant
3. Thiat sub'ect +~ts relationship to t1~e
Residentia] ~ prOPerty was considered as part of a 5tud
Hornes Fronting on Arteria] Highways; however, the conclusions reached
in that study indicated that these Y of the Problems of
potential, should be retained for si~nglecfamily~resident3altuseshavino future coimrierci3~
~• That no land use change has taNen p]ace since the P7annin
Counci] adopted A Study of the Problems of Residentia] Homes Fronting on Arteria]
~{~9f~Ways to warrant favorable consideration for commercial uses g Commission and City
5• 7'hat approva] of sub~ect F~etition would set an undesirable subject proFier~y,
strip co~nmercial deve]opment alon
of redevelopment of the cent~ g"rterials which would further reduceta~n for continued
6. That a r city shoppinq area. Y fossibility
on Che residenti~al~integr9tr1e proposed reclassification would have
~• That two Y of this general area, a deleterious effect
and a Persons appeared, representin
petition signed by 88 persons ~ `~ `~ ~~rsons present in
that one person and ~ letters were received al~ l~to'~ ~ouncil Chainber,
appeared in favor of subject petition. PPosition; and
~
I
'
~
,~ RD
j -1-
~,
i
~:
~.: :
'i=' .
~,~
. ,~ E
. ~ ~ ;r
r 'I I
:t ,
~'I
' .~
ti NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
~
~ to the City Council of the City of Annheim thet subject Petition for Reclessification be denied on the besis of the
~ eforementioned findings.
~ '
~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved me this 6th day f Apri 1~ I970.
I
I \
~ u ~,1
~
~ CH IRMAN ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
S ( ~C ~;'.-z-? (-~ ~~1Zc. f~• /
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs , Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thnt the (ore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
Apri 1 6~ 1970, ut 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, fierbst, Thom, Rowland.
i NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
I' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: S2ymour.
IN WITNESS WHERF,OF, I have hereunto set my hend this ].6th day of April~ 1970.
~~'L. ,~ j~%z,. ~~:_~
SECRETARY ANAEIEIM ClTY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 56
€.
1. ~ ~ R2-D -2
;'i ~~* + '
I
_.,_...
.. ..: . ...... . ......
. _...~ . / _ .-.,_. - _
~- --- ~ . -~ . _ ao.~.. .