PC 70-85, ;. .
~:~::,.
:~ s:;;
;, ~:.
,,t,~;
~_i .
~::j_
,.'
~' `,.
}
RESOLUTION NO. p~7~~85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 217~ BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anaheim did ceceive e veriEied Petition Eor Verience from
DECON CCRPORATION, WILLIAM D. RICHARDSON, 1833 East 17th St*eet, Santa Ana, California 92701,
Owner of certain real property situ~ted in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described in Exhibit "A attached hereto and referred to herein as though set
forth in full.
WEiEREAS, the City Planning Commieaian did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anehelm on
~'~ June 2, 1970, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., notice oE seid public hearing heving been duly given es requiced by
lww end ln uccatdance with the ptovisions of the Aneheim Munlcipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to heer and consider evidence for
~~ and ageinst soid proposed vorience end to inveetigete and make findings and recommendetions in connection therewith;
_ , , end
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigeUon, end study mede by itself and in its behalf,
and efter due eonsiderotion of all evidence and repoRs otEeced at seid hearing, does find and determine the following
Eects:
1. Thet the petitioner requests e varience from the Aneheim Municipal Code as follows, to establish
a 105-unit apartment complex:
1) SECTION 18.28.0~0(2) - Buildiny site area per dwellinq unit. (2400
s.~cuare feet per dwelling unit required; 1860
square feet proposeci).
2) SECTION 18.28.050(6-a-~~ - Minimuni required landscaped setback adjacent
to a local street. (15 feet of landscaped
setback required; 5 feet and 0 feet propused.
3) S ECTION 18.28.050(7) - Minimum distance between buildinqs. (Va* in
distances required; insufficient distances
between buildi.ngs proposed).
s~ .
F~ A
!:~ ~
2. That the petitioner presented no evidence to substantiate a hardshi~ existed iri the
development of subject property to warrant the ~lanning Commission's favorable consideration.
3. That the proposed density !:!4 dwelling units per acre) is 30~; qreater than that
permitted in the R-?_ Zone (18 dweiiing units per acre) and as such would present too great
a bu*cien upon the single-family tiomeowners in the R-1 subdivision to the south.
4. That the size and shape of {.he property is adequate to develop the property within
the confines of the site development standards of the R-2 Zone, thereby providing amenities
more compatible wi.th the existing R-1 homes to the south.
5. That subject property does not have the same development problems as the property to
' the southeast, consequently there is no justification for considering the aforementioned
~ waivers as necessary for the proper development of the property.
' ~*yt~' -
, ,
` :~ a: . :t r
`
y
. c .
~ . •r•
~•, ~
`,_i
~:r~~.~:r,;.:r:.^~n Tt:l~ ~r.sw~r~n~~ ~on:p;~~,;.r
421 NORTM MAIN STREE7 . SANTq qNq, CALIFORNIA • 547-G852
,,~,
~~~ ~T~ ~
_ ~~,~c
` "1 ~J
. 17:GviJ C~1~~~.'.7hi2CJ.\ ~
~ 5JJ =''+Sl S~V~:~l : ~11'1 : $1'~i r•CT
~°-= ~:+ A:`:.~, G4L2: G^~hTL4
Itiil',i: 4,'~:. D. RICt,sA.~JSON ' `,
~ ~i"
- ~o~r no. ~/ ,1_ / ,
Our Order No. ~-1082745
Form of Poliry Covcrage Rcqucsted: ~IF~~ IAIr~D TI 1;:,SSO~ IAiIO.\ S~A.RD COV'r„'~AG ::OLICY.
~~~'.:2= -=~-~
._1 ~_~,, ca_ _~z '_ti._ .,_ ae: ~:'~ :c 5;,._,,., oz C^.1i'_e~yc, Cc~'z:.;/ Gi G_•~.~~.,
V~UJ CJ~ ~..~~.~.r.~) C~:.'rC~.~iJ~.r a..., ~~~I,Ci.iu.
~'c ;' :oc _ o= „ic:... oi Lo;,a[:,~ 5„_.3 0p 0'_ !-1.. J. J, i~;/°_C_ --~C;:, ~.. ..::c: _': c: a
_ . ~7 ~ ~.~J~~l.'.~ ~~ JCI.. ~U~ ~u .~ ~U ~J ~iJ ~ .C~l....r'~1i~'. ~Ji. .~..i.l:~:~."'.~__..~iw.~i -..~.C~i~i.:.~.)
_ _CCO_CL~ C_ LC~ ti~.~^,"~~.C~ CGi:T.'G'Jp C^~l~'O::'~C~ ~GO„CC.:"..:.: ?Tl"G:1 :C .~C~'G1C_•?;/ ....~
O:' C=C:1 i`:.^.:^.L'C: ~c;;oi:~i:~g 5.^~l~L T.OuS 0:1 'i:::: wyi,:: :=.''_' c^.J.^_'^~0::_~ :if ~C.^.G~ ~:~_C3
:r - .. ^,
O' ~:i: .t'.J,^_'i~ O'S' .°.:ii:;TV1E0i.+ Oi C'.^..'?;~C ~)C•~:i~f~ (~'yiiOl'i'L',^..~ O': _.,~f'i~ Fi~ ~ jJ7
~:.~1,~::~ ~~ 1: ~.~~41~u /~CiV~• 7~ ~~~e 58 `~ ~_~c_ •cio•: o-? 0_d J1.:1~~+ ~r~I~ l~~w'.l.u V
i~ V:.J~..C... ._~ ,..:.,_ ~J =: `J;/ li.;DO~li'L103 .:O•~E~i_7~~~ c1 CJ. ~:':'i.C@ CG?:y O? ;;.1iC :
~C.7.^ i CCv~ G.'.'~i'~.^.C~~:^." 15~ ~~.~i9 i ri 000:: ~~ ~ry ~.~^J %~'i0 Oi Cil"i 1Clr:. tiLCC~ C:II
~ reco•r;:c o:; ~,.:::i O:r..;;e Cou.7cy~ dece•ribc~ ~., •_o'_.lo:r~.
.]i,l''_2'~ i:.::. ~~l`~i:'lCCC'i.?G:1 O:: ''~..~':C ::^v'l'i4:C...J~.:=~/ 1~.1:~. O:' J::_~u~,^,C': $'~J..::''u ::.i~:l
'i.:.: ~..^ui_:C-..~ f~ i= C Oi ~:. :'i.^.. u'~_ ::'i. '.}.f) ~-G::' O~ ... i/.:'J I2~i:: 1: J~;:.:L: ?:: .....~~
':»iC:.,.`~•..,..: i
._?) OCJ:: G~ 7r. 27 ...._., cJ~ _~CO~CD O'~ ~3iCL,•G': "r*~ ~G'~I:iGf~ ..w.1C. ::G'= .. ~..__y
~.1;:~ JC:i:?'' '3.~i.. :',vC _:.3~ '~;/ Ii1:C G: i~... .~0., 1:OZ:,~,, .,... .._:G::1 G:1 ... T_::7 .::CC:L;:G°.
1: ~06'.C ij,ri ?~~:,~ ;i5~ .~`J ... ;j7 0= .~::Ci:Y..'.^_=:'v;:i: ..;:'J~ i::CG::GD Gi ....i:~^Q".?::;;6'
~.':ii..~ ::`f •j 'i..~"1G_.w w., w..~ ~ f ..~C- ; ..._.a.. _. C'i..^.C: .....» ~/ ~ i::.. Gi' J C:=:C: GG_: :i ~W .... ~G~
u..=:,~ Cl:l'VC. CO:C,^.7JC SOL''i~::;.°.•L'G:`.:'1f .-~ _.~~:.1~ Oi' _.'~'.~O„OO iOCu~ .`~G;:;11
~'CC__...."..~. E.:`.;;?@ 0= ~i.0~ Gf" cj~~ .,.._ ~C^C_~~',::.:G:: 'v= .~~.GrSu~ :C~':.~ ''...'?.::::C ~...~i:_ '~.^v
.,~:.c~cw'^ve °c;'~z o3` ~8~ 7~" ;:*c~~ ;;o ... t•;:.c..,._ ~r '~_.._ o= ..~_r'_ ic;; ~; w:.::::ca
~O~i_`.~'_?'f ^..~O:y C^,,,,'iCt ~'~~:.^.'`~.C.'1•~ f ~11:c3 ':.O 'w1C C~.. .._!.li.:. Oi ...^.iCi Gic~ :.v~....c; -~c~ce
L'.~...J ..~1\I ~iQ1~'t~n n..~d C.l:a'A.ii'r~~l.~. 7~~~(V 1~:'~:1r ~.OV~V.~. TIJ~ ~...uVU~~ CCJ~~.:i"~: u:il:
'~J J
1.,^,_.r C:C:G~~,CC... il CiC~Ci 'iA kl1C ~~V+~YG O": ~,l'i'J::.iu li::%O':~..^.Ci ii.`.~'t1.^,'i. '»~ !~G.~7 ..._'•1
bcc:c oc~~,, ~a~c- j6'-: ni O::i_e;^~ Reeores o' .,a~~ Cr C~~~~~~; -°ee ::o=i;~ 1;3`
j~ ^ ~(i~~ t~..:'i. 1v9o~j'_ _C'c':. .::~CG .~0..~1 J(~ ~~,,, ~l(i: i'J:::~~ L~ij..~J ~.:i:':,j L:::_.v..
::O'1i::1 I~j iJ° G7~t T11CSi~ ~%'~~~~ iC'6'r i:0 wl1C a:A(~iy.°..~1'~f ~4C~~L~1:; O_' i::~u C::'l'~~~i
CO'~ .... ;Y:CS:~ .~ f~.c...^L' ~Yl b`2~ OO~ ZCu ~'I~.^,'i. ,.n . ~ ~ . ~ ? ; •'~
J 7 7 0 2J il..':: ~ i?'i 'i.=:@ .`.Gli'~:::~:: ~~f --a... Gi
?.:rcel 2 0_' Re ~ oj7 0~ s: ia St~~ _ Hi~~''.,,;~ I•, ~.. ~`~ Y7 a ".':,_.^J;;,
~~~. w,~~ li.~V~CG C"l.L~~.J G~.~i W4w~~
~i .:: ~cu•c~ 82° o6z 1}~ t•r~st 8je26 :ie::;,, So~'w'i jo° 53~ ~7" Tde~ u67.39 iea~ a: :
~c;a'Wz 32° 25~ 05" 4les~ 395•79 ±ee•c to ~::e poiLc o_' c.e~ir~.•~.:~.
~~
L:C::i'~i'_^•~ -_..... TO~'i.i0i1 Oi S^,..'_Ci ~.^~ ^~..~ Z C_~.~ GS1 .,.~ ._".._.~L.ap r~' _~~ ^l
_ :i;r~u :~ ~~... "'~ yo=37 . :'~.:w.^•~. ~y. i "11~.:'~~~ :a`~ 'vi.::C~ :.;j~ CC~ ~'v'_^ :~ ~J,~,~ .:._:J ::~.°V::.
7r ~J • ..: - ~,~.::~'_ •' '^' '
--___ ~;r_ w._~ z~,/ be t:i;;..~z o•r u•r.~. ;~;e rcel o, ic:.~ .:~.. c.:~: _~..5,
Sii"G:iCL'a':.~ : O:ICVi;_ ~ i.'1C' : i~~ ~ CV2'_^ ~.O d.'1Z..~p G3~ G: 7:.1: :' 'i:t_ G::,~, '~:.1Q .,,~ _,:.CC Oi
.,,..:d _~ »~ 'i~:~.. C':Gl'p CY' O ~i{:~0,,f il'1E+0 G::VO =GJ ..._.... 1i1 C•L:C:2 L.°._'1:_.:Y'` ~tl .~
w~G ..~.~ ~. vf 0~~ ~..:.y ~1~:1,ri..~ f Y::~~..li 4+^'"..f li~ CO:. i ~L`lZC 1i~'LL 0~ u:1~. ~~u~~~..a uyS:l:~ ~. ~. Gv.:~ ~J~:d)
Y.'.F.:::'V::u i_a 'i:i'lc CZ~:.9.'~ i2'G:3 b~ f.'.T2 .T..o :JC::::C:;J ,^,i::c O'Gi:i.Y'~ i,0 JN.~:.~~L. G_•'yC; _':.:Ci_"_i:~~
i~C~i ^:'~..~"iC CiiiCC Oi i.~'2. tZ~~~°'GY'.°.'C Oi `.r1~~.CS Oi Gi"r"!~~-' COll:t'~Y~ C: ~.1~C'1r12~ ~•'r,^-~'~~'`~~'
'.•'« .."C:] 1J~ iJ73 ;~ ~OC1+~GL^$ I10. 2b~lo.
/~~ -
..r . . _.
-~- J „~ ~
o: ~
c.~ ~1
~~_ . ~ .'~ ~ ~ i
~
' r 1
i -~
i
6. Tr:at development plans ir.dicace the creation of double frontage lots for the existing
,~ single ;amily homes, subject.ing them to tne traffi.c noises from both the R-1 and the propoe.ed
R-2 developments.
7. That th;rre are no e>;ceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applic~4le
' to the pror~rty involved or to the intended use of the oroperty that do not ap;~ly generally to
`• the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
! 8. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoymen!. of a
Y substantial property right possessed by other pxoperty in the same vicinity znd zone, and
denied to the property in question.
~ 9. That the requested variance will be materially detriment~l to the public welfare and
; injurious to the property or imorovements to the south, namely the single fainily subdivision,
by crezting a density that would ~e harm:ul to the peace, health, anci general welfare of the
~~ adjoining residents.
~ 10. 'that two persons appeared representing six persons present in the CounciJ Chamber, all in
`; opposition.
1i.
:n; NOW, THEREFORF, BE IT RL-SOLVED that the Anaheim City Planninq Commission does herabv deny
~ subiect Petition for Variance on the basis of the afore~rentioned findings.
: ,~
, I
i
THE FOREGUING F.FSOLUTION is signed and ~a~roved by me thi llth da of June,', 19?0.
1.~9 ~J
CH IRMAN ANAHEIf' CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO;~
ATTES T:
~~ ~ - ~~~z-~ ~~.~ ~
~'.~ 5t~rttinrtY aNA'Fi[Ih1 CITY PLANNING COMh1ISSIa'J
~~~ ! STATE OF CALIFORNIq }
~~~ COUDITY OF ORANGH ) ss.
,~ ; CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~~ ''~
; I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
~~~ certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a rneetin9 of the City Planning
'4~ Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on June 2, 1970, at 7:00 0'clock P.Pd. b
! vote of the members thereof: y the following
~i
~' AYES: CO~J~~IISSIONcRS: Allreo, Farano, Gauer, Ka
~; ywood, Seyniour, P.owland.
~
~ NOES: CCh1~~ISSIOtd[RS: iierbst.
! -' ABSQdT: COMMISSIONL•NS: Dlone.
~; j; IN INITN ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this llth day of June, 1970.
~ , ;:
E\ ~ _:
r • r~c-' C, z~
~ y vV' ~~ C~
~ SECRETARY ANAIiC-IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOIJ
~:
i
;;i
~ Res. No. 85
} .
~
,',~ ~
~ ~