PC 70-86•.
RESOLUTION NO,
PC70-86
~\i
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMEND[NG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Ofi ANAHEIM THAT
PETlTION FOR RECLASSIFICA'fION N0. ~~`'' »-~' ~ BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissiun of the City of Anaheim dId recelve a verified Petition for Reclossi:icr
tionfrom CLARENCE WAGNER, 8?_2 ~outh Sunkist Street, Anaheim, Califo:nia 92°06, CNmer; GL-OF,G~ L,
ARGYROS, 17291 Irvine Boulevard, 5t. i0', Tustin, California 92G80, Agent of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
that portion of the 6Yest half of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest ouatter oi Section 13,
Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the kancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as shown on a Map
recorded in Eook 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Ma~s, records of said Orange County lying South-
erly of the Southerly line of Tract No. 6531 as s°~own on a Map recorded in cook 242, pa9es 10
and 11 of said Miscellaneous Maps.
and
1 ~
'~~ A
;; ~
WHEREAS, the Clty PlenninQ Commias:on did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the City ot Anaheim on
June 7_, 1910, at~:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as cequired ~y
law and in aceordance with the proviaions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1$.72, to hear end coneider evidence
for and agoinst sald proposed recleseitication ond to investigate ond make [indin`s rnd recommmdations in connection
therewith; snd
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspectlon, investiQatlon, and study made by itselt and in its behelf, and
a$er due conaideration oE ell evldence and reports offered et arid hearing, does tind end determine the (ollowing fects:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes e reclassificetion of the ebove c~eecribed propetty [rom the County of Grange
A1, Agricuitural District, to the City of Anaheim R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone.
2. That the ~roposed reclassification is in conformance with the General Plan.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property 9s necessery end/or desirebte for the orderly and pro~
per development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassificalion of subject property docs properly relele to the zones end theer permitteJ
uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their Qermitted uses genecelly esteb-
liahed throughout the eommun?.ty.
5. 1'hat the proposed reclassification of subject property reyuires the dedication and
improvement ~f abutting streets in accordance with the Circu:ation [lement of the Genera]
Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensification
of land use.
6. That the petitioner stipulated to providing a complete vehicular circulation system
on subject j>roperty in the event tlie property is developed in two phases.
R-A .1-
...:'~'-~
i?C";, I~!iEREI~GF.~, HE "i7' nFir,Ll'LD t1-at t:,a Anaheim City Flanning Con:mission does aexr~y
reco~nmend tc the ;;qty, rounci; o: tne ;;ity uf Anaheim that s~bject Petitior. f~,
be aoproveo and, by so doir, tnot iitl
Exc]ude the aoove y' ~ 1°-~0~1~'9 of Lhe Anaheim Idunicipal Cr,~ee,eaamcnl~~~ton
to inco:por~t~ said~s'cscr;bedr~I~,;tY,rlom ih? County of Orange A1, Agricult:ura~ District and
the follov~ing conditi-:ns v,hicn are h~yE~nto the k-3, LPo~ltiplA-Family n?side~~tial, Zor,~r, upor.
use of subject property in crler ~"o pre;erveuthetsafety ~3no~senerapr~e19;rnite to the
the City of P.~aheim. P1O"°'ed
of the C~tizens of
1. That the owner oi suhier.~ ~. op~rt~ .;;-:al: ~e~ed to the C~ty ; i P.naheim a strip of ]and
53 feet in width from the r~~ter'irc o~ tne street alone~ Br,~l koaZ, 'or street widening nurposes.
2. 7~at all engineer..~g r~~quir~;nents u,` tl~,~ C.t}• or ~na3~,eim alc^~ Bail Road, incit:ding
preparation of impruve~nent nlans ar.d ~_ns«-,;:~•,
sidewalks, street ion of r,ll ir~,~ro-•~mcnt.,, such as c~rbs and
gradina ~nd pating, d~;_inage faciiiti~s c~S 9~~+ers,
complied with as rEy~!~Z~;d bv tix ,'(t e ottn;r aon,irtenant work s'~a]] be
fications on file ~' •`i~eineer ar.~ in ~c~;r~d;-,~,, with =_tandard plan, and s~eci-
t3a11 Road shal~ b in tf;^ ~f:ice o; ,he ~iiy Engineer; ;~r:t sf:re~t lighting fa;ilities a1~n
e instelle~; as rt•;~;i:ed by the Dire~t~~r ~: p~hli~ Utilities and in accoroa:~ce
with standard nlans and sp~.r;:'i~ations on file in L,:~. ~~fF're .~c tne Dir~ctor of Publi: i;tilitics:
that a bond in an amount r.nd i>rm ~atis.`actory to '..: Ciiy cf' Anaheim snal; pE posted with the
City to guarantee the insta] la ion ~f the abov~~ m!.• ,_;., ea r~,qui.rements.
3, That the owner oi' subject propert~y sr,al~ p~~y to the City of A.naheim the sun~ of 15
front foot along Ball Road, for tree ;;1~. ~tz~~,~~ pur~^ses.
4. That trasn storage areas shall 1;- prn•,~i. in accordance ~vitn a ~ rcy
with the office of the Director u~ Pu;:~._- • Pproved ~ans on fi]e
5_ That iire `'"°fL^• ;'_
the Chief of the FirerDepartment,~~ insta]led as requ'_red and determined to Ue necessary Ly
6. That al] air-conditioning facilitie~ 'I+a;] be properly shielded from viev~.
~7. That subject ~ro~erty shall be s~rveJ ay underground utilities.
8. That drainage of subject nro~,~rty shall be disnoseo of in a manner that is satisfactory
to the City Engineer.
9. Tnat the o~~~ner of subject oroperty shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $7g ~~e:
multiple-family unit to be used for parh and recreation purposes, said amount to be
time thc building permit is issued.
10. That these paid at the
recl~ssification proceedings are granted subject to completion of annexation
of subjer,t property to the City uf Anaheim,
11. That a 6-foot masonry wall sha11 be constructed along the nortli
carport walls are not developed. ~roperty line v~here
12. Prior to the in*_rodur_tion of a~ ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition I~os. 1,
2, 3, and 10, above mentioned, shal] be completed. The provisions or ri hts
resolution shall become null and void by action of the Cit Counci?
complied with within 180 days. ~ 9ranted by this
Y unlesc said conditions are
1~. That Conditior Nos. 4, 5, G, ?, &, 9, and 11, above mentioned, sha11 be complied ti•~itn
prior to final buildina and zoninq inspections.
TIiC FUREGOII;G RL-SOLUTiO'J ;s sianed and
A7'TF.; T:
--_~'~z~` 'z~-~~/
SECRETARY AfJAFIEI6~ CITY PLA^!hJI:JG COL;~:7ISSIG,'~J
STATE OF CP.I.IFOkiJIA )
CUUtJTY OF ORANGE ) S~
CITY OF APJAHEIM )
f.
i~ ~~
aPP ~~';;-i ~i)~ me th s,llth a• of Jur e, iy~i0,
~ ~ ~ ~,
,~.
•i I M q}{EI~,1 CITY FLA^Jh~ING COMh1ISSI0N
I, Ann Krebs, Secret~ry °,; the City Planning Commission of the City o; Anaheim, do f;ereby
certify ihat the foregpgn~ resolut:on ~;,,~s pa,sed ard adopt~d at a meeting of the City Planning
Cornmission of the City of Anah~~ir:, held on June 2, 1970, at ':00 0'clock P.~d., ~,
vote of the members th~;;,of:
) tf~~ follotvinn
AYGS: C~%MG1ISSIUtJLItS: A] lred, Fareno, Gauer, Herbst, KayN~ood, Seyrnoui•, F~oN~land.
Pd0-P'~,; -VISSIOiIL-R5: Idone.
ABSENT: ~01f~~iISSIC'JERS: None.
II~J WI71J'rSS 67HL•RFpF~ 1 have hcreunto set my hand this llth day of June, 1970.
,i "~ 11 fies. IJo. SG
~// i'(//'/ /A
~~C u.7 /
SCCPETAkY ,,,1AlIEIh~ CITY r~LANP1IiJG COfJ~h11SSI0N