PC 70-87RESOLUTION NO. PC70-87 ~
A RESOLUTION OF T:iE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION f?'r" THE CITY G!F ANANEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2179 gE ~iP°ROVED IIJ PART
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commission of ihe Clty of AnaheIm di~ receivc a veri~?,g Petition for Varience ftom
CLARFTJCE WAGNc'R, 822 South Sunkist Street, Anaheimy Caliiornia 9~f?~=., Owner; GEORGE L.
ARGYROS, 17291 Irvine Boulevari, St. 1G7, Tustin, California ~;1c~~~~ Agent of certair~ real
property si.tuated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, 5ta~e of California, described
as that portinn of the West half of the 5outheast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section
13, Tovrnship 4 South, Range 1G UJes±, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon oe Santa Ana, as shown on
a Map recorded in Book 51, page 10 oi Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County
lying southerly of the southerly line of Tract No. 6531 as shown on a Map recorded in Book
242, pages 10 and 11 of said ~discellaneous Maps.
: ~~
I
i
t
I
WHEREAS, the City Plonning Commtaelon did hold a public headng et the City Helf in tho City od Anr~heim on
June 2.~ 1970, et~ :00 o'clock P.M., notice oE said pubalc hearing having been duly gfven as required by
lew end in aecordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evldence for
end egeinst seid proposed varIance and to investiQate and meke findinge and recommendetions in connectfon t~nerewith;
end
WHEREAS, srid Commissfon, efter due inspectlon, invesdgaflon, end study made by itsclf end ln lta: behalf,
end efter due considerotion of ell evldence ond reporte offered at eald hesring, does find end determine the follqwing
fects:
1. Thet the petftioner requests a verionce trom the Anehelm Municipal Code as fol lows, to es tabl ish a
288-unit apartrnent ccTplex:
a. SECTION 18.28.05~(3-~) - ~d_inimum floor area. (700 square feet required;
490_square fe?t proposed for 7? units.
b. SECTION 18.28.050(l~-a-1) - Min._~un required buildinq setback.
c. S[CTION 18.7_S.OSU(7-a - N~inimum uista~cF• betwecn buildinqs. (15 feet
required; 11 fei~t proposed).
d. SECTION ]8.?8.05r(10-a - Code requirement of one en-losed rarkin~ snace
er i,nit. (Unly 276 units have enclosed parking
s~aces).
i ~x
2. That the petitioner submitted revised ~la~, ivr,,ch eliminated waiver 1-b, above
mentioned, and therefore withdrew said waiver.
3. That the Planning Commission in the past by ~:c_icy has granted bachelor units with a
minimum 4?_5 square feet for a maximum of 30~ o` the ur,its, therefore, waiver 1-a, above
mentioned, vaas granted on that basis.
4. That waiver 1-c, above mentioned, is granted on ?he basis that large multiple family
developments approved in the past have been qranted waiver a= ,r..in.mum distance bet.ween
buildings; and tiiat since the 11-foot separation is bet;vten the rear of apartments and the
rear of carports, said waiver e~ould not be a substantial deviation from Code.
5. That the petitioner stipulated to proviCing the req~aired carport storage areas for
those carports having only a roof in a convenient location clo,-.e to tt~e parking area, there-
fore, o-~aiver 1-d is granted on the basis that only 1?. carports would be witt~out storaqe
areas within said carport, but would have storage a:eas provided convenient to the park.ing
areos.
6. That t~ie requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment .f a
substantial property right possessed by otf~er property in the same vir,inity and zc~e, a!~d
denied to the p~operty in question.
,...,... ..~ .:~~.iw~,: :.
--.-~-. ,.,.. . .. ... _
i
7. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property
is located.
8. That the petitioner stioulated to pr~viding e complete vehicular circulation system
on subjer,t property, in the event the property is developed in two phases.
NOPJ, THEREFOHE, BE I'f P.ESOLVED that tlie Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to
b? a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve
the safety and general welfar~ of the Citizens of the City of Anat~eim.
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of ~eclassification t~o. 69-~0-61.
2. That subject prope:ty shall be developed substantially in accordance with ~lans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim rrarked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7,
provided however, that complete vehicular circulation facil•ities shall be provided for each
phase in the event subject property is developed in two phases, as stipulated to by ttie
petitioner.
THE FOREGOING R[SOLUTIC~! is siyned and proved by me ~this 11 h day of J ne, 1970.
CH RM ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIJG ~MMISSION
ATT6 T:
// .-/~ /
G ~j~?212~~ t~ ~(~;..,i
SECRETARY ANAfiEIM ITY PLANPJIfJG C'.OMJdISSIOP~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF QRk(~GE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAEfEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planninq Commission of the City of Anahrim, do hereby
certify th~t the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a rneetinq of the City Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim, held cn June 2, 1970, at 7:OG 0'clock P.N., by the following
vote of thn members tliereof:
AYES: COh~41ISSI0N[f?S: Allred, F?sano, Gauer, Herbst, Kaywoud, Seymour, Kowland.
~~0~: CUh1MISSIO'JE!?S: IJone.
ABSL-tJT: COMI~tISSIOiJFRS: I7one.
Itd WI7TIESS V~liER[OF~ I have hereunto set my hand this llth day of June, 147G.
~ ~/ ~
~/2 rt/ /l/?c./~._._~
SECR[TARY qNAHc M CITY PLAPJNING COtdb1ISSI0IJ
~~~
.,
j
.) ' Res. P•lo. 87
~
~ ~
,f ~