PC 71-106__ , . .
RESOLUTION NO, PC71-106
A kP;SOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OI' THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMM~NDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVAL
OI' AN AM~NDMENT TO AREA DEVELOpMENT PLAN N0. 95, TFIERETO
WFIF,REAS, the City Planning Commiss~on of the City of Anaheim o~,
.7uly 27, L970, in Resalution No, PC70-139, recommended approval of
Area Development PJ,an No. 95, Exhibit "A'~, gubject to conditions; and
WH~REAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim on August 4, 1970,
in Resolution No. 70R-392, adop~ed Area Development F~lan No. 95, Exhibit
"~-", ~ubject to condittons; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the ac~option of Area Development Plan No, 95,
Exhibit "p,", the Anaheim City Planning Commis~ion did receive a Petition
for Reciassification No. 70-71-54, which proposed C-1 zoning on the
parcel immediately south of the property that was approved for C-1 zoning
under Reclassification No. 70-71-3, ancl a Petition for Conditianal Use
Permit No, 1237, which proposed an ambulance service on the parcel
immediately ~.outh of the original ytudy area and north of the service
station located at the northwest corner of Orange Avenue and Euclid
Street; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that based upon these
recent development proposals within the area, considerat.ion should be
given, at an advertised pub.lic hearing, to amendii~g Area Development
Plan No, 95 by including one additional parcel to the south of the
original study area, and changing the locations far the acces~way returns
to Euclid Street; and
WHEREAS, the City Planriing Cominission did hold a public hearing at
the City Hall in the City ~~f Anaheim on June 2, 1971, at 2:00 o'clock
F.M., notice of said publi.c hearing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordanc~ with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal
Code, to hear and further consider Area Development P~,an No. 95 ahd to
investig~,te and make fi.ndings and recommendation^ in connection tillere-
with; and
WHEREAS, staff eubmitted for Commission con.sideration Exhibit "B",
which indicated the relocation of the proposed center access return to
Eucl;.d Street from the northerly boundary of the parcel approved for
C-1 zoning under Reclassification No. 70-71-3, to the southerly boundary
of that property and the northerly boundary of the property proposed for
C-1 zoning under Reclassification No. 70-71-54, Additionally, the
~~uthernmost acceas return was shifted southerly from its original
location to a point along the northerly bouadary of the property proposed
for the ambulance service under Conditional Use Permit No. 1237, No
change was proposed in the northernmost access return to Euclid Street;
and
WHEREAS, discussions at the public hearing prompted the Planning
Commission to direct stafP to amend Exhibit "B" by also relocating the
northernmost access return northerly to the property line separating
the two northernmost lots, thereby eliminating the hammerhead originally
proposed on the nozthernmost lot; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commissi~n was of the opinion that the
lecations of the three access points depicted on Exhibit "B" (as amenc?ed)
should remain fixed, r.ather than serve as suggested locations, so that
the property owners could be assured af the buildab~e land that would
be available to them if commercial development of their prop~rty wa.s
anticipated,
..__,._*„
~
rt.
NOW, THLR~FORG, BE IT RLSOLVEp, that Lhe Anaheim C~.ty Planning
Commission does heraby recommend to the City Council tha adaption of
I3xh' bit "D", aa ame ndod, to replace the original Gxhibit "A" approved by
the City Council for Areu Developmont Plan No. 95, as providing a mor~
accoptablo secondary vohicular circulaL•ion plan for tha shallow lota
fronting on the west aide of f uclicl Street south of Broadway, and amend
the original condi tions as followa:
1. That the owners of all a£fected parcels shall provide a 20-foot
wide vehicular accessway alonq the west boundrsries of said parcels
and 20-foot wide ve'hicular accessway returns to ~uclid ~treet, as
dopicted on F.xh.ibit "E" (as amended) , as the parcels are proposed
for commercial dovelopment, or on demand by the Cityj and that
only th.ree ( 3) permanent ~rivate vehicular acceasway returns be
permitted to Euclid Street to 1.essen the vehicular movements onta
this street.
2. That the locations shown on Exhibit "B" (as amended) are deemed to
be fixed access locations, so ~hat property owners ma,y be assured
of the buildab le land that would be avai lable to them when commer-
cial development o.E thei.r property is ant:lcipated.
3. That all acces sways and access return5 shall be installed upon
demand by the City, and that mutual easement rights to and over
said vehicular accessways shall be granted to and exchanged by
all property owners covered in Area Development Plan No. 95, upon
demand by the Cityi ~aid easement riqhts shall be aubmitted to and
approved by the City Attorney and then be recorded with the Orange
County Recorde r,
4. That the requi red vehicular accessways shall be paved in accordance
with ~hz requi rements of the Director of Public Works.
5. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west
side of the 20-font wi3e north-south accessway r.equired along all
properties encompas sed in the Area Development Plan.
6. That vehicula.r access rights, exr,ept at street and/or alley openings
shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim, provided, however, that
temporary access to Euclid Street from the individual parcels
included withi n Are a Development Plan No . 95 shall be allowed
until such time as the City demands improvernents of the private
vehicular acces~ways; further provided that the individual
property owners shall enter into an agreement with the City of
Anaheim +:o close the temporary accessways that are not in
conformance with the location of the three (3) permanent access
returns that sre designated on Exhibit "B" (as amended) ; and that
porti.on of the temporary accessway, lying within the front setback,
shall be lands caped . Said ~,greement shall be recorded with the
Orange County Recorder's office prior to the issuance of a building
permit on an individual parcel.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 1Qth
day of June, 1971.
_~_~ ~..,~~..~GL .
-~- CHAIRMA~ N A
ATTEST:
~ ~
~~! ~' f c -'._/ )'t.. c_' ~c~- -
SECRETARY ANAHETM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Resolution No. PC71-lU6
- 2 -
IM CT_TY PLANNING COMMISSION
~
STATE OI' CALI~'ORNZA
COUNTY Or QRANG~ ) es.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary oE the Ci~y Planninq Commiasion of ~he City
of Anaheim, do her9by certif.y that the faregoing resolution was passefl
and adop~ed at a meeting o£ the City Qlanning Commiasion of the City of
Anaheim, held on June 2, 1971, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., by the Eollowing
vote of tha mombers thereo£:
AYES: rpMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gnuer, Herbst, 1Caywnod, Seymour.
NOI:S: COMM2SSTONERS: RowiAnd.
ABSEIQT: COMMTSSIONERS: Allred.
IN WITNGSS WHER~oF, I have hereunto set my hand this ].Oth day of
June, 1971.
~ - ~ . , , ~ ,
. ~
~ _"
~
~'" ~...='"
~'l' T 2~ ``~.~..~--= _
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS~ION
Resolution No. PC71-106