Loading...
PC 71-128RESOI.UTiON N0. PC71- 128 A RE:SOI.UTIOit OF THE C1TY ALANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO ~'HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITy OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. ~~" 71' 60 BE APPROVED WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commiasion of the City of Anaheim dld recelve a vecified Petltion Eor Reclessifica- tlonfrom ERNEST A. COLLINS, 1421 East Santa Ana Street, AnaYieim, California 92805, OwnorJ L~E BRUCE, ~,854 ~lorth Tustiin, Orange, California 92665, Agent, o£ certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as the Southerly 165.0 feet of the Wosterly one-half of Lot 6, as ahown on a Map of a Subdivision of the West half of Lot 9 of Anaheim Extension, filed in Book 1, page 53 af Record oP Surveys, oE satd Orange County. (~eid 165.0 feet bei.ng meaoured fram the centerlir-e of Santa Ana Street, as shown on said Record of Survey.) Excepting there- from the Westerly 140.0 feet of said Westerly one-half of Lot 6 ~ ; and ; WKEREAS, the City Plenning C~nmission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on June 28, 1971, at 7:30o'c ~ck P.M. notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given es required by law and in accocdence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,72, to hear end consider evidence for and ageinst said ptoposed reclassification and to investigate and meke findings end recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, aftet due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself end in its behelf, end after due consideretion of all evidence end reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following Eects: 1. That the petitioner proposes a ceclessificatio~ of the abovc described prope:ty from the R-A, Agricul.tural, 'Lone to the R~1, One Family Residential, Zone. 2. That the proposed reclessification is in confonnance with the General Plan. H ~~ * .+tx 3. 1'hat the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary end/or desireble for the orderly and pro- per development of the community. 4. Thet the proposed reclassificetion of subject property does properly relete to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close pmximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses genera(ly esteb- lished throughout the community. 5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires tl~e dedi~atio~~ at~d improvement of abutting (streets/alleys) in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated f.ncrease in traffic which wi11 be gener~ted by the intensification of land use. R-A _1_ ----+.:.--„ ;. , ..? ~, .. .~,q, . ...r~,R;7yr, ~ , . ., ` ... e, ~ ,,~ .~ i '~`r ' NdW, THEREFORE, BE I'r ESOLVED th~t the Anaheim Clty Plenri,u~ Commission doee hereby rocommend ~'' to the Gty Councll of the Clty oi Anaheim that subicct Petltion for ReclssslEica~ion be approved and, by so dolnE, ` thet Title 13•Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the ~bove de4cribed property Erom the ,,~ R-A, Agric~ile~~ral, Zone anc~ Co incarporate said deacribed property inGo Che R-1, One I'amily Re;sidenCial, Zune, upon the Following condil-iona which are hereby Eo«nd to be a neceasary ~ prerequisite to the pro oaed uae oF a~b ect P ~ pruperty in order to preaerv~ the safety and ~? genQrol welEare oE the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. ~+, L. That the owner ot sub~ect property ahall deed to the City of Anaheim a Atrip of land ~~, 32 Eeet in width from ehe centerline of the atreel• along Santa Ana SCreet, for street widen- ~?' tng purpoaes, '~~ 2. That all engineering requirements oE the City ~f Anaheim along Santa Ana Street, in- cluding preparation of improvement pl.ans and inatal~ation of all improvements , such as ~ curUs and gutters, aidewelka, aL•reet gradin~ snd paving , drainage facilities, or ather s'~ appurl•enanl• work shall be complied with as required by the Ci~y Engineer and in accordance wi.th sCandard plana and speci.fi.cations on file in the oF£ice of the City Engineer; and that "~ a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the Cily of Anaheim shall be posted with the ~~,`~'~ City to ~uarantee the installation oL the above mentioned requirement. `;, 3 That the owner oE Rubiect property sh~ll pay L•o the Ctty of Anaheim the sum ot 15C ' per f.ront foot along Si.nta Ana Street, for tree plantin~ purposes. ,r; 4. That aubject properL•y ahall be served by underground utilities. ` 5, That the owner of aub~ect properCy sl~all pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate ,;~, park and recreation in-lieu Eees as derermined to be appropriate by the City Counc!.1, said ~.,,: ~' fees to be paid at the time the building permit ia iasued, •;`;; 6, l~rior to the introduction of an ordinance r.ezoning sub,jecl- property, Condiri.on Nos, :`i 1, 2, and 3, Above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights grgnted Uy this ~;i'~ resulution aha11 become ~iull and void by acrion of the City Council unless said conditions ;~~ are complied with wirhin 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time As the City ;~ Council may grant. `; 7, That Condil•ion 130. 4, above mentioned, sha11 be complied with pr3.or to Linal '~~ building and zonittp, inspectiuns. T1iE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 8th day of July, 1971. / / ~ .~ ~ ~ --~"~CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ~%~~~~4~ -~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORAIVGE ) ss, CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs, Secrptary of the City Ylanning Commission of the CiEy of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution wes passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Plannin~ Commission of the City of Anaheim~ held on JunP 28, 1971, at 2:U0 o'clock P.M., by the folloa~ing vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COhiMISSIONERS: Farano. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of Jiily, 1971. ~ /JZy'C..~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION G': " ` `' ~ }~ RESOLUTION N0. 128 ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ R2-A _2. -: _. ~, ~ ~, ~