PC 71-1461
~
RESOLUrION N0, PC~1-146
A RESOLUTION OF THr CITY PLAN'VING COMMIS5ION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
TNAT PETI'.I'ION F'OR VAf2IANCE N0, 2280 BE DENI~p
"t
~~. WHEREAS, the City Plannin~ Comniisrlon of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified PeNtlon for V~riance f
MAIIIL OlI. CORI'OIZATION
9901 So
th
,
'
,
u
rou~
Paramourit, U~wney, California 90240, QHmer; GCNElt9L
MAINTENANCC, INCORPORATED
11372 Weste
~ ,
rn Avenue, S~at,tar,, Calitornia 906A0, Agent of cer:ain
real property aituated in the City of Anaheim
Count
ot U
.
', ,
y
range, 5rate of California
described as Parcel 1: That portion of Eiluck "C" of Kroeger's Subdxv,[sLon of
D-1
Anaheim
Vine
as
acd L
~'
,
~
~
r'
~'
,
.
,
y
ot
per map recordnd in book 5 pt~ge 3f~ oC Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of.
the C,ounty Recorder of said Courity. Reginning on th
S
h
~
~ e
out
erly line of said Block "C" at a
point 2.50 feet Westerly from the Southeas~erl
corne
f
"
"
~
~ y
r o
. said Blocic
C
thence Northerly
parallel with the easterly line of said (31ock "C" 135 f
t
;:'
,,k
4
~ ee
to the Sou
said land c theaster
onveyed to rred Samual and wife by deed recotded April 2)
1946
pages 455 of Of
L
Yli
k11
£
~
y,p
, ,
,
n
oo
1402
£icial Records, thence Westerly alang the Southerly line of said land
conveyed ta Fred Samual
a dist
~
~ ,
ance of 99.15 feet to the Northeasterly corner of Lot 1 of
Tract No, 1157, as per map recorded in book 40
~ pages .34 and 35 of Miscellaneous Maps, recorda
of said County, thence Southerly along the GasLerl lin
r
~;
~
~ e o
a disrance of 135 Ceet to the Southerly line of said Block
~~~aidhence1Casterly along the 1157,
Southerly line o
E said Bl
k "
"
'•-%
,y~
,
• .
oc
C
to the oinC of
b e
1157 as per map recorded in book [F~ P glnning, Parcel 2; Lot 1 oE Trac~ :;o.
pages 34 and 35
f
~~,
~ ,
o
Miscellaneous Maps, in the off.ice of
the County Recorder of said County.
k'
~1}
k~
P'~~,
y 1
M.
1. .
•
~
~i
.
P
5i •
q~'
"'~`
`°
WHEREAS, the ~ity Planning Commis~lon did hold a public hearing ai the City Hall in the City of AneheIm o
July 26 1971 ~
10;00 o clock A
M
~
;?:i
.
n
, notice of said public hearing heving been dul
law and In acoordence
with the provisions of the Anaheim M
~en as required b
i
l
l
~i:
~.; y
un
c
pa
Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and co
~a Against aeid proposed variance end to investieete end make Eindin
s
d
V
t
~; g
en
recommendetions in conaect n
therewith
~
~'
'
_ ~'
;~,
_
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself and in its behelf,
and eFter due consideration of all evidence and reports offeced at s
id h
f
~ e
ncts:
earing, does find and determine the Eollowi
ng
~'?. ~` 1. Thet the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim M
i
i
' un
c
pel Code:
x;;~:l
~' ;
; - ,,
a• ~-c~ _±::i 18.62.090(B-1) - Number of free-sl-andin~ siQns permitted. (Une
~~>
pti }'
i free-standing sign permitted; two proposed).
a'~'
~'~' ~
'` ~. :~~:,," ; Z8.62.J90(B-2) - Minimum height of a fr e-
e standin~v sign. 8 .feet
~=
S i
~
~ required; 7 feet, 3 inches proposed).
2. 'Ct~ai: t:•e pe~itioner has not demonstrated a hardshi
exi
d
;:
~ p
ste
Lo warrant FevorablP
consideratio;: oL' ~',,e waivars requested.
;
~~'~ 3. Tha~ ~;ra~::.~in~ subject petil•ion would be grantitig a privilege not gratited Co service
sta;.ions of tl,e o~:her oil companies
'+
'~
~
'~ .
4. That ap~roval of subjecL- petition would establish a undesirable precedent encouraging
similar requests frnm the other oil
r~,
`t
,
~
:~
~; companies.
5. That signin~ of the existin~ service stations advertis~n the m
give aways made ik very di
g Yriad of products and
ffic
lt
'
o
~t ~r.; .
u
~,
t
readily iatr.tiF»-••
havi-ig another sign on the premises. .~ervice s_a~~:.~:-:,ttL• ~~~h Without
'
~ ~.; 6, ihat ar.;~ harship that mighr result if sub'ect
J peti_~~ari were denied would .•. .a
imposed hardship
~ I~
~ ,
7. That the a licen ~ ~
PP ~,uld approach the problem of signing in a manner which wou:•;
integrate all signing on one
:
?
o
.~
~ ~
;.
.
sign, ra[her than cor~sidering advertising each service ~
or product on an individual signiitb ;•asi~.,
.
. •.
~
~ .
S ~
±~ ^ ~ Vl-D
~ ~ -1-
~ ~
~
~
, .
~~ ~~~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Planning CommissIon does hereby deny subject
Pekitlon for Variance on the basis of thr aforementioned findings.
THF. FOREGOIPIG RESOLUTION Is signed end approved by me this 5th day of August, 1971.
r ~~Z~~`T/
~ CHAIRMAN ANAEIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ ATTEST:
i
~j
~ "~ y
SECR~TARy ANAHFIM CSTY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COTJNTY OF ORANGE ) ss, •
CITY OF ANAHEIAI )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certi
~ Ju1g ~26 1u197i as passed and Adopted et a meeting of the City Plan~ing Commission of the City of Anal eimhheld on
y - , at 10:00 o clock A.M; by the following voteaf ihe members thereof;
AYES: CaMMISSIONERS: Faran
o, Gauer, Herbst, Kaywood, Seymour.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th d8y of Augusr, 1971,
,~
4 *
. ~
RESOLUTION I~IO. 146
V2-D
.~'~!%?z~~v
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION '
-2-
' `.
,~-~~a
~ , .
M