PC 71-168~r',
~~
+~ ri: .
;i;
<.
,f
c
~
4
~
~
~
RESOLUTION NO.
~. C
rc~i-i~e
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLAP~NING COMhi1SSTON OF TNF CITY OF ANAHEIM
TNAT PGTITION FOR VARIANCE N0, 2~~ 4 , 8Is GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plonning C~mmission o[ the City oE Anaheim d:d receive ~ verified Petition for Variance
From G~EI~L -'~TTI3I;RG, c/o Rimel, li. 'ey & Logan, 7.010 North Main Street,
canta Ana, Califcrnia ~2'; O1, Owriez; STANDARD-PA~II'tC CORPOR11TIOtJ, 1565
West MacArL-hur floulevard, Casta Mc:sa, California 9262G, A~?ent, of. certair~
r.eal property situated in the City of Anahsim, Cou:~ty u,' Urange, Stat~: of.
Cali~ornia, as described in ~xhibit 'A" a~tach hereto and referred to
h~rein t~G ~et forl-h in fu11
;,
I .~5
; end
~ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissiun riid hold a publlc heo~ing at the City Hall in the City~ of Anaheim
'i! on .~ ug us t 2 3, 19 71 , at 2;0~ o'clock P,1~1., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required
~ by Iaw end in acco~dance with th.: provi~ion~ of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end consider
if evidence for and egainst said proposed varianc~ and to investigate and meke fir;dings end recommendations in connec-
: ~ tion `.ti.erewith; and
'` WHERF.AS, said Commissi~n, aEter due inspection, investigation, end study m:~de by itself and in its behalf,
! :i
• i;~ and aEte~ due consideration of all evidence and reports ofFered at seid hea~ing, does iind and determine the Eollowing
i ?~ Eacts:
1, That the petitioner reauests a varisnce from the Anaheim Nunicipal Code;
Section 18e2$,050~3-a) - Minimum floor area p~.r dwel 'n,~ nit square
fg~, required, ,~00 sQUare feet proposed
Section 18.28,050~5-b) - Maximum hei ht with'n 1 fee f n R-A 2 n.
-,~.n_e,~-st,~orG required~ two s~,qries proposed
Section 18e28.e5c b) - M' ' ' en buildin so ~2 fee
required; 1 proposed
~'
~
~~
~ A
~: .~t
2. That there ace exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
oc to the intended use of the property that do not apply genereliy to the property or cless of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantiai property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, and denied to the ptoperty in question.
4, That the requested varis~nce will nat be materially detrimental to the public welfate or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in suah vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
5. That three persons representing 5 persons in the audience appeared in opposition
to said petition,
V1-G
-1-
,.e'„~~:~
~
~
r„
~
,.,
,..
,,
;:.
~ ,
i
. .
~ The est~te or ittteres{; in the lt~nd hercinnftct• describeci or referrecl bo covered by this Report is:
~ , t
I'CC: ~].T.l~1C'
Tii;le to s<<id est~i:c or iiiteres~nt tlie d~tc hcrcof is ~~es1:c~, iii:
h-•-~j~..r1.~~? , ~, ~
/~'~~'~~'ll~, ~~"r•; '
. ~ rj~ •~ :~ `Sr~'•,
~~ .1'.
~ ~1(r, <:.
<< ' , ~ ~c~;., ,.~ i
MC Ce1RTY ~ ~" ~ l..f,~ ~~l ' :> ~
• ~~
~; zc~; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~:, htV ~,r~~' :~
c- '• ., ~;,~ ,; ~
r., > •
~~, , `~;,i
`"~'' ~;^'~~ ~t~
ETtILL }l. POT`t'BL:RG, WIlU acqui.red tii:le a, I;T}iLL II.
At the d~te hereof exceptions to covera~e in nddition to the r~ri~ited excel~tions 1nd exclusions cont~ined
iu said policy fo~~m ~~'ould 'uc t~s fullu~~~s:
l~ i' ~ ' Tlic lancl refcri•ed lo ii~ thisltr~ioi•t; is sitt~f~ted in the State of Gnlifornin, Cottnt.y of. nxan~Te ,
`.~1 and is dcscril.~cci ;~s foll~~~~•s;
~ Thc t~or.L-h G79.9f tcoi; of thc 1;1~L• half: of: t:he Nor.i.hcasi: c~tizrtcr. of:
the Saut.hr.asi: ~uartc~~ oi: ~e~L•i.on 1~1, To~vnship ~1 Sou~h, Ratige ].1
,` ~,,est, S. I3. I3. .4 h1.
~ I T~XC];I~`1'ItaG ~!'IiT;RI•:FRO~ti: 1:.hF11: ~07'1:1.011 c3escr. ibcd 1S L'ol.l.o~v5 :
, f3ecri.nning 1i: th~ ~doxtheast corner ot the SauL-heast one-quzrler af
saicl Section 14 , i.}:encc I~1e~tcrly along i.he tsori:h~i~ly l~.ne of: said
i S~ui:he~ist or~e-auari:er, a clistanc:c of. 190.00 feei:; thei~cc Souttier.ly
_; ' para].1~1 ~.~i.~ch th~ ra ~terly 1.ine of: said Southcast onc-auartcr, to
- a~oinL• on a l.i;~c: ~rir.aLlel wii~h ~nd dis~ant h5.00 f:eeL- Soutlle~-].y
(measured at: ric~ht ~u~«les) trom said Northerly J.iitc, saicl paini:
bei~lg tre true no~.nt of bec1inninq; thct~ee L~a~~i:er.J.y alonc~ la~t Men-
tio~i~d ~?~~allel li.;:e a di:,~ar.ee oi: 1.:?4,91 feet to tl:e bectirnincJ of-
a tancreni: curve concave i:o thc South~•:est and havinq a radius of
~5.00 f.eet; thenc~ I~asterly, Soui:heasLerly, and Southcrly alonR
; saicl Cllx'Vl, an aze disi.anc:e of 39.3G feet L•o a point of 1:anc~eiley
i wit}I the t9esi;crly line of the I:asterly ~0.00 fcet of saic~ „eci:ion;
thence Soui.herly a1~ny said S~~ester].y li.ne, a disi:ance of 1?..9.91
feet ta a la.ne parallet wit}i and di.stani: 195.00 frei: SOLlt:~l~~rly
(mcasurecl aloilg t:lie I:~~sterly line of said Southeas~ on~~-quzii~er. )
I L•rom~ ttie af-oremenL•ioned NartherJ.y li~le; thence C~]esi:erly ala~lg lasi:
mentionecl par.a11e1 line a di.~i:~nce of .15Q.00 fee~:, more or_ less,
to a li.ne p~irall.el taii:h said Ezsterly 11.ne and passinc~ '.:}1xOL1C~J~1 the
~rue poinL• oL• beyinning; thence Northczly along last mentioncd
• para11e1 J.itic a disi:ance of 150.00 Lect, more or less, to il~e true
, poini: of beginning. .
'~ ALSO LXCI,PTIIIG TIILRFFROti thaL• portion as Dceded to the StaLe of
~~ Cali f.ornia in the Deed recorded February 23, 1951 in Book ?.1.49,
~, P;:~ge 6a of O~~1C].11. Records. ;
~ ` ^~,;` JI! ~ :>.
~ ~ ' • ~p,.,`..-. ._..._.,...~_..:.~_~~. __....._......._.. ....._.._. ... « f;l.~,<<,~~ry~~ ~_~~~,
~~ ~.. 1U!~~~.rV•_. ~ ,
' r . D~V~ ,. ,
:, ~ St(;,ti, ~:
, ;1 . `: (;,,'~:fi:~~~iC~/'
~/ j~{ ~
` ~ ~ e/1111~'t~?Vt. I,i~. ~•a ~~ ~fi~ _ _. _...__..----
er •
. ~
* ~
v~* °~,.f', ~ ' .
~
f`~
_ .,. _ .. .... i
~ _
~s. ' ~ r _ ,
t'
~ NOW, THEREFOR~, B~ IT RE:~ ~LVFD thet the Anaheim Clty Planning C~ .nisaion daes hereby grant subJect
~ Petition for Veriencc, upon the followirtR conditione which ete heroby Found t~ be a nocoesary prerequlsite to the pro•
~ pos~d use uf the ~subject proporty in ordor to proaerve the safety and generAl welfere of the CltfzenA of the City of
? Anaheim: '
~
~; (1) That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Roclaasification No.
~ ~1-72-Ao
~_ (2) That aubje,ct property shall be developed substanti~+lly in r~ccordance with plans and
~ specifications on Pile with the City of Anaheim +narked Exhibit Nosa 1, 2, 3, 4~ ~~
,+ 6~ 'J~ 8~ 9~ 1U, and 11 ~ pravi ded however ~ that the owner(s) of sub ject praparty
` shall install a landscaped screen which shall canaist of trees planted on 20-foot
~: centers along the entire westerly boundery of subj~ct prop~rtv.
~ :;~
:~x
; F~
~
:.~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signec: and epproved by me this 2 n d d ay o f S e p t e mb e r, 19 71 .
~ 7tr,, ~
.i ,~ I`
i~~
~ '! \
7:1
~~~: CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSION
_~
ATTEST:
SEC TARY~ANAHEIM ¢~T PLANNING C~MMISSION
pro tem
STATE OF CALIFORNxA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se.
CITY OF ANAHEIM i
pro tem
I, Lee Burgess , Secretary/of the City Planr.ing Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certiEy that
the foregoing resolution wns passed and adoptecl et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on Augus t 2 3, 1971 , et 2:0~ o'clock P.M.~ by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED~.GAUER~ HERBST~ K~YWOOD~ RQWLAND
[aOES: COMMYSSIONER~: FARANO, SEYMOUR
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto sek my hend this 2 n d d ay o f S e p t e mb e r, 19 71 .
t
~
~7~
RE50LUTION NO. P C 71-16 6
.rQ~2/ ~R.d.D
SEC ETARY~ANAIiEYM C PLANNING COMMI5S10N
pro tem
~ ~;I V2-G -2-
~~
*
~
,.
~