PC 71-17~~ ~ ~` .~
RESOLUTION NO, P~~1-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING CQMMJSSI~JN OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITX OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFfCAT10N N0, ~~'~.r 1~____24 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiesion of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclasaifice-
tionErc:n BEN W. SANDKNOP, ET AL, ~ J. GRAYSON, 26292 Ridgemore Drive, Sun City, California
92.381, Owner; DEL BROWN, P. 0. Box 432, Santa Ana, California 92702, Agent of certain real
property situated in the City oF Anaheim, County of Orange, State af California, describ~;r,' as
the West 150.00 feet of ~he East 898.OQ feet of the North ha1F of the Northeast quarte. of
•the Northeast Quarter oP Section 13, Township 4 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los
Coyoi:es, as pex map recorded in Book 51, Page 11 of Misce]laneous Maps, in the office of the
County Recorder of said County. Except that portion therc~of lying Northe.rly of the Southerly
line of the 70.00 foot strip of ]and described in the final order of condemnation fil~d in
connec~:ion with Case No. 73187 in ~he Superior Court of the State of California, ir, and for
the County of Orange, a copy of said final order was recorded September 12, 1958 in 9ook
4414 Page 337 of Officia~ Records,
; ~nd
WHEREAS, the City Planning ComR~issiort did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City ~:f Anaheim on
February 8~ 1971 ~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as tequired by
lew and in accordence with the provisio~s of the Anahetm Municipal Code, Chapter 1$,72, to hear and consider evidence
for and ageinst seid proposed reclassification and to investigate and meke tindings end recommendatlons in co~nection
t}ierewith; and
1VHEREA5, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself and in its behelf, end
after due consideretion of all evidence and reports oEEered at said hearing, does find end determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclessificetion of the above described property ftom the R-A~ Agricultural~
Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential,Zone.
2. That the proposed reclassification :is in conformance with the Anaheim General Plan.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject prop~rty is necessery and/or desirable (or the orderly and pro-
per development of the community.
4. That the propoaed reclassification of subject pruperty does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally esteblished in close prosimity to sttbject property and to the zunes and their permi:ted uses genecally estab-
lished throughout the community.
5. That the pro~osed reclassificatior~ of subject property does not require
dedication b~at does require improvement of abutting st_~~~ets in accordance with tl-;~ Ci~culation,
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generated L~ the intensification of land use.
6. That two persons appeared in opposition.
I ~~ ~'~ R-A _1_
; ;,., ~.
~ ~ , ~:
~~. ~ )
~ NOW, THEREFOR~,. DF IT RESOLV~D that the Anaheim City Planning
C~mrniaeion does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of
Anaheim that sub~ect PetiCion for. Reclaseification be approvea, and
hy so doing, ~hat Title 18-2nning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be
amended ta exclude the above described propPrty from the R-A~ AG1tICUL'i'URAL
20N~ and to incorporate Auid deocribed property into the R-3, MULTTPLI:
~AMILY REG'"`ENTIAL, ZONF upon the following conditi~na which are hereby
Eornd ta b~ a necpssary pzerequiaire to thc propoer.d uae of aub~ect
property in ~rder to preserve th~ saEe~y and gener~l welfare of the
Citizens of the City of ~Anaheim:
~~ ~1) That a11 engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim,
~'' :lncluding prepar~tion of improvement plana and inatallation
of all improvements for the alley on the aouth side of the
}~? prcperty, or other app~rtenant work shall be complied with
.;~ as required by the City ~ngineer and in accordance with seandard
' plans and apecificationa on file in the office o£ the CiLy
`;f . ~ngineer; that atreet li~nting facilltiea along SCinaon Street
;~ ahall be inatalled as required by the Director of Public Utili.ties,
~,'1 and in accordance with etandard plane and apecifications on
~' file iz- the office of ~.he Airector of Public Utili.tiea; and that
_ :~s
a bond in an amount xnd form sakisfactory to the Ci.ty of Anaheim
~~za shall be posted with the City to guarantee the iustallation of Che
';7 above mentioned requirements,
i :;G
~ :'E
,~ (2) That the owner(s) of aub,ject property ai~a1]. pay to the City
~';: of Ana'~ieim the sum of l5~ per front foot atong Stinson Street for
~'~~~ atree: tree puxposea.
: (3; 'Phat trash .:torage areas shall be provided in accordance with
;''' ~ppruved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public
;'~~ Wurks .
;i.; (4) That £ire hydrariCS shall be installed as required and determined
'~'~ to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
i:,
.~'+~' (5; That all air c~nd~tioning facilitiea ahall be properly ehielded
I1'~ fron~ view and the sound buffered from ad~acent properties.
~~ ~6) That sub~ect property shall be served ~y underground utilities.
~~~ That the owner(s) of sub,~ect rroperty ehall pay to the City
o: '.naheim the 2pprupriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined
` to be appropriate by the City Council, aaid fees to be paid at the
~.`. time the building permit is issued.
a~
~'' (8) That a 5-foot chain link fence be provided along the aouth side
of the Ora;ige County Flood Contral Channel sub~ect to the approval
~ oF the Oran~e County Flood Control Diatrict.
Ni
, (3) Prior to the introductiun of an ordinance rezoning sub~ect property,
~,; Condition Nos. 1 and 2 above mentioned, shall be complet~:d. The
~,, provisions or rights granted by this reaolu--tion shall become nr.11
~.~ and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are
~;~'J complied with within one year from the date hereof, or such further
,;~r~ time as the City Council may grant.
N ;y.
,., (10) Tlzat Condition Nns. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8, above mentioned, shall
I_~'~ be complied with prior to Final building and zoning inspections.
, ;;,
t f.
~~
' -~
~ ~ `s
' !:~
=,:~
,.v
~;
~
;
/~(
- PC71-17
,
~A , r1
i ;~
~;
.
t
. ~.~~.
, '" ~. ,~a j
_,~
'~{; THE ~C~REGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 18th day of February, 1971.
; ~ ~ ,~
'r% ~..,/ /
,~ . ..
~
~! ... _ ~ .~ i
CHAIRMAN ANAH fM CITY PLAP7NING COMMISSION
{ ATTEST,
, 'j
3
•, ;~ ~/ ~J~~``~ /-G~/
~ .~
!:~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~i`,
- ~ STATE Ok' CALIFORNIA )
' '~# COUNTY OF ORANG~ ) ss.
" CIT'Y OF ANAHEIM )
;i
{
~: I, Ann Krebs, Secretary uf the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
,,`i; going resolution was passed end edopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
~;;; February 8~ 1971 ~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
,':i AYES: COMMISSIONER5: ,,llred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Kaywood, Seymour.
~ ;k
' ',,~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
~`a
~~ AI3SENT: COMMISSiONERS: Row?and.
~
;~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 18th of Februdry~ 1971.
C/C= ~YL 22~T ~~~ ~•~i
~
SECRETAR'Y ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 17
R2-D .~
~ ~
~ ?'
~ '
~
~ ~
«
*~n~.
-'ZT~:-
\
, • ..~n~y+ ~ .
~
•- h