PC 71-172M ~
t ~ I ~
RESOLUTION NO. P C 71-17 2 _
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI'~'Y PLANNING COMMISSION OF TFIB CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2 28 9 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commio~ion of the City of Aneheirn did recalve a veritied Petitlon for Veriance from
A.S.A.'•].n, CnRPORAT.iUf~, DOG South Beach B~ule vard, Anaheim, Cali forn~.a 92804,
O~.anai ot cer.tain r.eal prc~~~exty situ~~ted in tha City of ~naheim, C~unty o;:
~r~anye, st~te of: Cali :~r.na.a, descr.~.~ed a~ Parcel .L; Lot 168 of mract No. '122a
as per ma~~ recorded i.n i~ook G° 1'~~q,~s 34 to 37 inclus~va of. Miscellaneous Pdar.,9,
i.n the of. Ei.ce oE the County uecorder of said ca~~ncy; and t>arcel 2: that portion
of that 96.00 f.eet• wlde sr.r.ip af land :~hown ag service road on map of Tract
`!^• 2228 a~; ner m.ap Yecorded ;n 3ook h9 Pages 34 to 37 inclusive of Nliscellan•-
oous Maps, i.n thP ~f.fic? oF t.ha County Ftecorder of sAid county, 1~>>nc~ ~.ae:~~c:.ly
o:f I,ot lEiB ~f. Guid tract an3 northerly of the westaYlv pr.ol~nqation of the
~;outherly stra~ rht line of. said '.ot 16fl.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisaion did hold a publia h~arfng at the City Hell ia the City of Anaheim on
Auqus t 23 , 1971 , at 2:00 o'ciock P.M., notice cf sa{d public heaiing having been duly given es required by
lew end in eccordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,68, to hear and conaider evidence for
end egeinst seid proposed varience and to inveatigete end meke findings arid recommendations in connection therewith;
and
i' WHER~A5, eaid Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itseif and in its behelf,
' ~' and after due conaideration of all evidence pnd reports offered at said heArIng, does find and determine the following
' `~ fects:
~ 1. Thet the petitioner requeats a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code;
-~ Section 18,~+0.050(a) - All arkin . must be rovided to the rear of a residential
'_'~',. structureo The appl i cant is proposing parking stalls in
~`;~ front of the residential s{ructuree)
{:~'~ _Sec;ion 18,40~070 ~B-a) a 6-foot masonr wall re uired between C-1 and R-1 lotso
- • ,~t
~~ ' ?'~ ~No wall -~ eing prov~ ed
~''' Section 18.62e155~a) s M ' m,' n areao (8 square feet permitted~ 6~+ square feet
~ ~
'"~ proposed
` f~ 2o That the petitioner(s) propose to utilize the exi~ting residential structure for
~ ;~'~ an office-professional buildin~a
, 3a That th~re are no exceptional or extraordina ry circumstances or conditions appli-
~ cable to the prop~rty involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply
~'t ~enerally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
' '~ ~+o That the r~equested variance i s not necessary for {he preservat ion and enjoymer~t
~ ~' of a substantial property right possessed by otl-pr property in the same vicinity and zone~
t ~ ~~
and denied to the property in question.
'~~ ~~, That the requested variance will be materially detrimontal to ihe public welfare
~'~ or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinitV and zone in which the
~ ''' proper6y is located,
~ T,iat the property i n quest i on i s ad jacent to a pr ime res i der,t i a 1~rea anc~ no
t hardship has been displayed to warrant approval of thi s request,
~~ ~, That one of the dr i veways ;he appl ? cant proposes to use fronts on Rome Avenue
~ which is strictly a residential streeto
~ s;,g 8a That there is an over-abundance of C-1 prope~ t~~~ in the areao
~ ;~ 9, That the requested waivers are sections of tF~e Code relatin~ specifecally to
,~w resid~ntial structures in commercial zones and deal with the compatibilitv of these converted
: ;~;i residential structures to the surrounding residential uses,
;~j 10~ That two persons appeared in opposition and submitted a petition with 88 names in
. ~~ V1-D opposition to the proposale
~ '~~ '~'
,~
~~ '~i
~'i:
~
r.
,..... _ _: ._ _ ,.
r~.
i
',, ~
.. ~.
;
~:
`
~
,
ti.
;.
,~
~ NCW, THERGFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thAt the Aneheim City Plnnning Commission doea hereby deny subject
_~ Petition for Veriance on the besis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed nn' approved by me ia znd day of September, 1971 .
' ~
CHAIRMAN ANAFIEIh1 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~.
~" I Y
~
SECRE ARY/ANAHEIM CITI'~ ANNING COMMISSION
pra tem
`+ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
' ; ~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
~~' CITY OF ANAHEIM )
j pro tem
I+' I, Lee lAux.g~ss,,Secretary/of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certify ~~idt the fore-
~,, going resolution was passed and adnpted at a meeting of the City Planning Commissioct of the Lity of Anaheim, held ~n
~~y, Aug us t 2 3, 19 71 , at 2;00 o'clock P,M,, by the fo:l~wing vote o( the membera thereof:
!~"
~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ FARANO~ GAUER~ HERBST~ KAYWOOD~ SEYMOUR
;
~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
i
i
• ABSGNT: COMMISSIODIERS: ROWLAND
IN WITNESS WHE~EOF, I havp hereunto set my hanc~ this 2 n c1 day o f S e p t emb e r, 19 71 .
~~
-•
.
*
I~
RESOLUTION N0. p C 71-17 2
V2-D
--~~~~ '~'-d'L'~,
SECR~TARY~ANAHEIM C PLANNING COMMISSION
pro tem
-2-
-~';~'
~
~~