Loading...
PC 71-181I j RESQLUTIQN N0 ?C71~-181 A RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY PLANNING ~OMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITiON FOR VARIANCE N0. 2 2 9 2 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisalon of the City of Anahefm did recelve e veri(ied Petitlon far Vertence from LASCO INUUSTRILS, INCORPOl2AT1:D, 1561 Chapin Road, Montebello, Californie 90640, Owner; of certain real property situated in tlie City of Anahetm, County of Orange, Stete of. Cali- Eorr.ia, deacribed as Lot A o.f Tract No, 800 ~s per map recorded in book 29, page 13 nf Mis- cell sneoua Mape, in the office of the county recorJer ~f said county, together with t:he souttiweaterly one-hal~ of Sinunons Avenue abandoned and vaceted by order of rhe Boa~~d of Sup e rvisora of Orange Coual•y, (;alitornia, a certified copy of which Order was recordc:d Uct o ber 9, 1935, in book 777, page 456 of Utfici.al Recorda of said counry, Also Chat por- tion of itichard Street ad,joining said lot on C:~e weat hAVi.ng been vacated and abandoned by O rder of ehe Board of Supervisora of Orange ~ounty on November 6, 1946, a certifipd cop;r of which was recorded I~ovember 9, 1946, it~ b~ok 1505, page 142 of Official Records of said county, EXC;EI'T TIIEREFROM that partion lying westerly of ehe easterly line there- of c onveyed to the Orange County Flood Control Uistrict~ a body corporate and politic, by deed recorded as Document No. 10696, on January 22, 196Q, in book 5064, page 560 of Offi- cia 1 Recorda of said county ; end WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City He11 in the City of Aneheim on ~~ i~ t e r~b e r A, 19 71 , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given es cequired by law end in accordance with the provislons of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear end consider evidence for and eg~inst seid proposed veriance and to investigete and meke findings end recommendations in connec- tton therewith; end WHEREAS, said Commissinn, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself end in its behelf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does Eind and determine the [ollowing fects: 1. That the petitioner requests e varience Erom the Aneheim Munic~ . ~,ode as follows : :t.;C"~,~~; ],r,52.;?f,U;3-1,; - o-roct :~oli.d r•a::onry wall required to enclose .__._---......---_.__..._._....~__..__---. - ----- ----•• - out~3c~~L .;*_orag~ ar~as. (S].atted chainlink fence prci:cyed on the west property line along the f.lOGCa control channel only.) '£ 2. Thet thete are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the propecty involved '}~ or to the intended use oE the property that da not apply generally to the property or cless of use in the same vicinity ~ h and zone. ~~ 3. Thet the reauested variance is necessary Eor the preservation and enjoyment of a substantiel property right I ~ossessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question. ~'~ 4. That the requested variance will not be meteri~liy detrimental to the public welfat~ ~r injurious to the pcop- ~ ~ erty or improvements in su=h vicinity and zone in which the property is located. ~ % :~ • Tnat ti :~ .peti.tioner stipulated tYiat storage parts would not exceed ~ six ir.c::e.~ an~:~e ..h~ proposed C-foot criainlink fence. ~ ~~ a ~ ; V1-G ~ 1- _ ";;;; ~ . i ~ .,,:.,Y ... ,, ~r,. - ,: .,,~ ,- . . :.. _,.,._,.:. ._... . . . ~+ ' ~ ~...~ NQW, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet khe Anaheim Clt, Planning Commlealon does hereby greet eubJact Petition for Varience, upon the following canditlone which are hareby found to be e necoasery prerequieite to the pro- posod use of the subJocl property in ~rder to presorve the eafety end general welfare of the Citizena oE the City of Anaheim: ~ 1. That this variance ia granted aubjact to the complation of Realassi- ~ fication No. Fi6-67-1.4, now pen~ing. ~ 2. That subject property shall be developed subatantially in accordance with plana and specif.ications on file wi~h the ~ity oE Anaheim marked Exhib•lt Nos. 1, 2, and 3~ provided, however, that the petitioner ahall provide Qir.her a 6-faot masonry wall, or alternatively, a 6-£oot chainlink fence with dena~ Landacaping that will grow to oover said fence within one year, or a chain- ~ link fenca with colored alum.inum sla*.s and 15-gallon trees selected from the ,'~ list established i.n tho (SC) Zone planted at 20••foot intervalst and that any ~a~ landacaping proposed shall include irrigation facilities. r'~ ; ;~ . 3. Thxt Condition No. 2, above mentioned, ahall be complied with prior ~'° to the commencement of any outdoor storage activity. ~ ?,~ 4. That stored products or materials shall not project more than 6 inches , above th~ 6-foot high fence. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is aigned and approved by me this 16 th d ay o f S e p te mb e r, 19 71 . CHAIR AN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNWG COMMISSION ATTEST: ~.~9~J~st~ ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~TATE OF CALIFORAiIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) i~~ I, Ann Krebs , Secretary of the City Planning Cammission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that ~ the foregoing resolution was passed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of ihe City ot Aneheim, ~ held on S e p t emb e r 8, 1 Q 71 , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE . ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ROWLAND. , ~ , A ~~ IN WIrNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 16 th d ay o f S e p t e mb e r, 19 71 . SECRETARY ANAHEIIVI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. P C 71-181 V2-G -2- . .:~;; ; Y 1~ , . . - h