PC 71-199i~~~ ~
... ~ ,. ..~r. ~~
. . . ... . . - . _ ,. ... , ... .....,. . ..., i. _ . _ .. . ... . . . _ .
t. `
~~ ,1
RESOLUTION N0. P C 71-19 9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIN~ COMMISSION OF TH~ C1TY Or ANANEIM
RECOMMENDING TQ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THtiT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO, ~ 1`~? BE DISAPPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did recelve u verified Petitlon for Re-
class{fication from CAFL M. BERG, ,7R. , ET AL, 5523 North Burton AvenuQ, San
Gabriel, California 91776, Gwnars= BUTZER HOUSING CORPORATION, pQUG
I~OUN, 2283 W~s~ Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801, Agent, of
certain real proper.ty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, ~
State o.f California, d=scribed as Lot 4 in B].ock K of the Kr.aemer Txact,
as shown on a MaX~ recorded in i3ook 12, pages 87 and 88 of Miscellaneous
Records, in the ofFice of the County Recorder of. Los Angeles County,
California; excepting there£rom that portion lying Southerly o£• the
North~rly line of the lan~i described in the deed to the Orange County
Flood Contro.l District, recorded October 19, 1960 in eook 5469, page
487 of Official Records, in the office of the County P.ecorder of Orange
County, California
; end
:y WHFREAS, the City Planning Commiasion did hold a public hearing at the City Hnll in the City of Anaheim
' on 0 c~. ~1 , 19 71 at 2:p0 o'clock P.M• notice of said public hearing having been duly given es required by
+ law and in accordance with the provisions oE the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 1~.72, to hear and consider
. J~ evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate end make Einding , and recommendations
~ in connection therewith; and
i~
'' WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itselE and in its be-
~~;~ half, snd efter due consideration of all evidence and reports oEfered at said hearing, does Eind and determine the
~ following fa~t~:
f~ 1. That the petitionet proposes a reclassification of the above described property from the ri-1, L:[GHT
,~ INDUSTRI~~L, ZONE to the R-3, MULTIPLE F:.~iILY RGSIDENTI~1L, ZONE,
':~ 2. That the proposed reclassification is not-in conforma*~ce with the General Plan.
~ 3. That the industrial area boundaries have been e~tablished with Orangethorpe
j;,. Avenue Ueing the line of division between industrial and residential. usea.
.~'
4. That to per,mit encroachment of residential uses inro the indus[rial area
I~.. would discourage further industrLal development of an area long designat.ed on hhe
~ General Plan for induetrial land use,
5. That established industrial development in this general area would be adverse-
ly affected by incompatible land use encroachment due to the inher~nt conflicts between
• industrial u~es and residential uses suct~ as traffic parterns, notse, odors, hours oP
„ operation, etc.
6. Tliat the integrity of the lung-est.ablished industrial axea should Ue maintained.
7. Thae the proposed reclassification of subject property is not necessar.y and/or
des:rable £or t{ie orderly and proper development of the comml~nity.
~. I~ 8. 1'hat one letter from a large industrial complex was recei.ved in opposition.
~~~
R ~~~ R~ -1-
.:~i~. i
-•.,--,:,..~„ .
~
. r . .. .. ., . .. _ . ~
~~.
~
'~ NOW, TNE.REFORE, $E IT RESOLVGD thet the Anaheim Clty Planning Commission does hereby recommend
`' to the City Council of the City oE An~heim that subject Petition for Reclessification be denied on the basis of the
~'' ' eforem~ntione~l findings,
TEIE rOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and Approved by .ne t / 14 th d a o f 0 c t ob e r, 15 71 .
i ~~
CHAIR AN ANAHEIM CITY Pi.ANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
:~
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
n";~
;z, COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
.;~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
<~ I, Ann Krebs,Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereb certif that the fo e-
+ Y Y r
~~ going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held an
~ O c tob e r 4, 19 71 , at 2:OQ o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
>r
._~
I~:~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYId00D.
~~~ .
`f- N~ES: COMMISSIONERS: NONF.,
r
' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ROWLAND, SEYMOtTR,
;~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14 th d ay o f 0 c tob e r, 19 71 .
SECR~,TARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. P C 71-19 9
R2-D _2_
~i
k
~
, ~
1~
'°°~^ _., .. . _ _ ~ :
_- ._ . ~ . . ,. ~ ~„~.
~ ,
` , . • V
~