PC 71-209~4
~ ~
'`1
~~1
;~G?,
,.
'~,1
~
~r ~
r,,:; .
RESOLUTION N0. _PC71-209
A RESOLUTION OI' TH~ ANAHEIM CTTY PLANNTNG COMM:[S5tON RECOMMENDTNG TO THG
CITY COUNCIL OF TFIE CImY OF ANAH~IM ADOPTTON CF AFEA DrVELOFMENT PLAN
N0. 107, TXHIBIT NO. 1, TO PROVIDL A CIRCULAT:iON PLAN FOR PRGPERTY
L~CATED ON THt~ SOUTH STDT:' OI' SROADWAY IiL'I`WEGN LOARA STREET
AND THG SOUTHERN FACIFIC RATLROI~D TRACKS
WH~REA~, a certain parcel of property located on the south side of
~ Broadway west of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks was proposed for
,;: reclassification ta multiple-family rasidential use, and as a result of
possible vehiculr~r circulation problems involving subject properLy and
' adjoina.ng propertios, iti was deemed advisable to consider an Area Develop-
ment Plan for a partern of circulation and access for the total area so
affected; and
WHEREA~, the City Plannin~ Commission did hold public hearings in
the City Hal1 in tYie City of Anaheim on May 17, June .L4, September 20,
and October 18, 1971, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heari.ng
haviny been duly giv~n as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and cansider evidence
for and against said proposed Area Developmen~ Plan, and to investigate
and make findings and recommendations in ccnnec~ion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, a£ter due inspection, ~.r~vestigatian, and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due considerati~n of
all evid~nce and reports offered at said hearing, cloes find and determine
the following facts:
1. That the study area, comprised of approximately 20 acres, is 3esignated
for medium-density residential development on the Anaheim ~eneral Plan
and could be anticipated to develop wi~h upwards of 600 units on the
proper.ty.
_, ; 2. That with the potential dwelling unit density for parcels in the study
are~ and with an estimated traffic volume of 4,200 vehicles per day,
it was the Traffic Engineer's opinion that a collector connecting
Broadway to Loara Street should be provided ~o accommodate a portion
~ of the generated traffic.
~ 3. That Exhibit "A" projects a local street wi*_h an ultimate width of
~~ 64 feet extending easterly from Loara Street and returning northerly
to Broadway which would provide for both needed east-west and north-
south circulation in the area, as well as providinq additional means
,;s ot access to the properties in the study area.
;~
'~ 4. That Exhibit "A," a].so depicts a 54-foot wide street with a 1-foot
c
holding strip adjacent te the southerly property line, and it is
;, anticipated that additional required right-of-way will be acquired
~~ at such time as the adjacent property to the south is developed.
5. That an additiona7. potential benefit of the prcposed street ~~:ould be
tlte possibility of pr.oviding stree~ extensions to the south in the
event the school ~istrict p~~perty is not utilized for their purposes.
A representative of the sc~~ool district has advised that there dre no
plans to develop a school on the property, but that the school district
has no plans to sell the property either.
o ` 6. That a central access road is deemed necessary to serve any proposed
},. ~ development of the study area, and that road should be of sufficient
~ ,{ width to accommodate the anticipated volumes and should also ser~~e
{ as a collector road which would provide access to the interior drivi:s
; that had been proposed in plans for development of the property.
S
~ ;
~ ~x:
*
_.:,,; ~
~
~
NOW, TIirRLI'ORI~7, DG IT RGSOLVLp rhat the Anaheim City Planning Commi~sion
doos heroby ado~~t; and rocommand to tho City Council of the City of Anaheim
tha adopti~n af AroA uavolopmont F~lAn No. 107, Exhibi.t "A", as bei:.g a
logical oizculation pattern for the study r~rea.
~;
~ TlI~ I'ORLGC)ING RGSOI,UTION ie aignod and approved by rno this llth day
` of Nov~mber, 1971.
.' ~,- ` \ -
-- ,~;-.«_ -. .
CfiA AN RQ TEM ANANGIM TY PL,ANt~t[NG CUMMISSION
ATTE;ST:
~i
9GCRI:TARY ANAIi~ M CITX PLANNING COMMISSION
STA'PG OF' CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OI' QRANGE ) ss,
CI'PY OF ANAIiEIM )
~ I, Ar~n Krebs, Secr.etary of the City Flanning Com~niasion of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing rescJ.utian was passed and
adopted at a mPeting of the City P.lanning Commiasion of the City of Anaheim
held on Nov~mber l, 1911, at 2;00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the
members thereoP:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NQES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABStsNT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, HERBST.
~
~ IN WTTNESS WFiEREOF, I have hereunto set• my hand this llth day of
" i November, 1971.
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
1:
~ •:
~
~ (.
i:
~k
' ~~
~'
1~
~
~
~
, ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC71-209
- 2 -
.., i
.'~3'~"+~
~