PC 71-242~, ~~
RL'•SOLUTION N0. _ PC71-242
•--------~--
A RCSOLUTION OF 1'NE CITY PLANNING COMMISSiON O~ THE CiTY OC ANAHCIM1
THAT PETITION FOR CONDI'fIONAL USE PERh1IT ~279 BE DENIED
~-
fl ~~
WHGREAS, the City Planning Commisslon of the City of Anaheim did recelve e verlfioc: Pet
ditional Use Permtt from WILLIAM J. AND PATRIC,IA A, BURKL, Post Of.fi.ce Box 63~,9
Cali.for.nia 928(16, Owners of. certain real property sir~ar.ed in the Clry of
County of Orange, State of Californi~~, deacribed in Lx ~i.bir "A" at~ach~:d I
referred to t~erein ae tl~ough sel forl-l~ i.n full
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on December 13, 1971 et2 :00 o'clock P.M., notiae of said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law c-nd in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal code, Chapter 18.64, to I~eor
and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use end to investigate and make findings snd
recommendatlons in connectior, therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, 9fter due inspectio~, investigation, and study made by itself and in its be-
half, and after due conslderation oE all evidence end reports offered et said heoring, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by Code SECTION
0~:52.060(1-a) to wit: utilize ati outdoor area for casting of concrete product~ with waiver
S~CTIOPI 18.52.OG0(3-b) -:)utdoor use enclosure (6-foot high, so].id masonry
wa11 required; a chainlink fence witti slats proposed,)
2. Ttiat the concrete casting operation proposed ~ut-of-doors would be completel.y
visible Lrom botti the P.iveroide r'reaway and the Miraloma Avenue overpass,
3. T{~al the proposed use is too intense a use for this area, since tl~ere would be
consl.derable dust that could affect the adjoining uses, and i.s a use that should be lo-
ca~ed adjacenC to the river where similar uses, such as sand pits and coz~crete batching
£ac_~.lities, are located.
4. ~'hat traffic from the propased use would be deletPrious to the apartment complex
locaL•ed on rhe street,~vhich woul.d serve as an accessway from and to the property, due to
noise, odor, and dust Lliat •aould be emaneting.
5. Thet even though Che use would be er~closed, it wo~~ld be extremPly difficult to
buffer the use ir~ su~h a manner tl~iat it would not be visible.
CI-D . 1 _
.,~, _ .; I
~
h
,.~
,~'~
~, : '
r,,
' NOW, THEREFORE, B~ IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition foe Canditional Use Permit on the basis of the eforementioned findings.
TIiE FORGGOING RESOLU~'ION is signed and approved by me thi 23rd da of December, 197'l.
, ..~r ~
s ~ ~ ~~~~~
' CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
'.' ATTEST:
;;.
• ~; ;~~
il s;?
ij :;:i
-,!~ :; SECREI'ARY ANAHE CITY PLANNING COAiMISSION
.:I .1;
~ STATE OF CALIFGRNIA )
~ . COUNTY OF ORAPIGE ) ss.
I ,.
' CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann ICrebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do heceby certify that the fore-
4~' going resolutioa was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
De::ember 13, 1571, et 2:00 o'clock P.M,, by the (ollowing vote of the members thereof:
~. AYES: COMMISSIONEFt5: ALLRED, GAUER, HERBST, KA1'~a00D,
NOES: COMMISSIONEE~S: FARANO.
ABSENT: COMMISSIOPTEF2S: ROWLAND, SEYMOUR,
- ;:~ IIV WITIVESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto aet my hand this 23rd day of December, 1971.
~
SECRETARY ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSIdN
~
i
, ;.
*
.l~r
R)~SOLiJTION NO. PC71-242
Cl-D _2_
---~-.-.,s ,.
~
.~