PC 71-26~• ~ , 1
RE~OLUTION N0. PC71-26
A RCSOLUfTON OF Tf~IE C17'Y f~LANNiN~ COMMISSION QF THE CITY OF ANAl1~IM RLCOMM,I:fJD.ItdU
TO TI-lE CITY OOUNCIL A STREET NAME CHAN:~E COH A PORTION OF SUNKIST ~'lRl.~:i'
EXTENUI"JG NORTIIERLY FROM I,A PALMA AVENUE TO RE NAMED M1RAI.OMA AVEiNI1F
WIIEREAS, Sunkis~t SLreet precen~;ly •termina~tes at the Riverc~ide Fr~eway :,verc.t~ossing;
and
; WIIEREAS, coni~us:i.on has resulted becausEa it was impossib.le ~ho si~n Niiraloma flvenue a~:
the top of the Riversi.de Freeway; and `
~
~ WHGEZEAS, th~ Anahe~.m City Planning Commission on December 28, 1970 s~t, f'or public
~ h~aring consideration of a st.reet nam~ r.hange for a porti~;~ of Sunkis~L Street; and
.';
,~ WFIEREAS, ~;he City Planning Cemmi. ssion did hold a publ ic hearing a1: th~ City Ha11 ~ n the
Y ~ City of Anaheim on r bruary 8, 1971, ai: 2:OU 0'clock P.M., noti.ce of sa.id public hear.ing havinc~
'.i been duly given as required by law and in accordance w:ith the provis:ions oF tl~~ Anal~ie.im Municiqal
%; Code, to hear. and consicier evidence for ,,nd against said proposed stree~t name change and to
~' '~{~ investigate and make Findi.ngs and recommendatinns in connection tl,erewitl~; and
4 !!~
` -. ~4, WHEREAS, said Commi.ssion, after due inspec(.ion, investigation, and study made by
:,,;~ itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ail evidence and r.eports offered
~:f at said hearing, does find and determine the followi.ng fac~ts:
;4;
,.,
,:`::4i 1. That visitors to the industrial area oF the City were unable to find their
;'~;ir way on loca.l streets to Miraloma Avenue, since signing of the strPet was not
i;~ on t}~e south side of the Riverside Freeway overpass.
~ r~
,'~ 2. That Sur;kist Street terminated at the center of the Riverside Freeway ove.rpass.
,,,
,e,
'r 3. That the traffic en ineer su ~~
~ 9' ggested that tt~e logical break for ~igning vrhicl~
; '~~x would eliminate the confusion of locating Miraloma Avenue should l~e at tne
~,,':~ north side of La Palma Avenue.
j~~ NCW, THEREFORE, A[ IT RESOLVEU that ~:he An~heim City Plann: ng Commission does i~er^by
" .
; '~ :,k recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim a street nar~e ~hange for. a portion of
i'?s' Sunkist Street, extending from the north side of La Palma Avern~e ta th? c^,~::~r oi ti~~
~ ~I~~ Riverside Freeway overpass, to be renamed Miraloma Avenue in ordei tn :~~ci.litate be±t.r~r
w ~ `,'t
~;,~ better signing for visitor~ to the City attemptinct to reach the northeast i~dustr.za~. area
~ :;~ from the south.
~
~F
::~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION .is signed and approved by ~e this 181~h ci c~F FeF~ ,~_~ar~;~. ~'??:
~;; - - ~~!"::~" ~ .. / ~ . „
q ~ ,~ ~~~ .~ --
,, ,~ i~~.`~.~t .Q
~ I'~.:~ - CFIA1 ~J ANAFIE~M CITY PLANf;Ii~1:.~ COMMISS.ON
~ ~~ ATTE~T:
' ~! l
';1. . ~~L-~ 7-2_-/l_ ~ ..~{~~.
; ., ^~,c_
:,5 "_ ..._.~
~;.~ SECRETARY ANAHEI~1 CITY PLA~JhiNG COMMIS~:;,~;'
;~ STATE OF CALIFO~;iJIA )
`_` COUNTY OF ORAI~~E ) ss.
'%~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
;'.s
,, ,"; I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City oF Anaheim, do hereby
'c certify that the foregoing res~lution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning
!;,;~ Commission of the City of Anahei.m, held on February 8, 1971, at 2:00 0'clock P.M., by the
;;~;~ following vote of the members thereof:
~ :%~
~.~~~ AYES: COIv4viISSIONERS: Allred, Parano, Herbst, Kaywood.
~~~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
~ .;~rt
, ~ ABSENT: COMMI~SIONERS: Gauer, Rowland, Seymour.
~5:
~ n"~ IN WITNESS VJHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 18th day of February, '~71~
.~`y~=, r'..
~~1~:, J' L = ~~~_~~~"a
~. ~ - ~---
~ }~ SECRETARY .qNAHEIM CITY ~LA~'NING COMMI5S10N
~..
f ~
~
~~
~ '~
..,.r.. . ~f
~ ' ~
. .
~,
A ....
~ .
^~