PC 71-3~1~ )
RESOLUTION NQ, t'c; ~ L- 3
...._-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CJTY OF ANAi~EIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE; CITY COUNCIC.. OF 1'HE CITY OF ANAHEIh1 1'iiAT
P~TITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 10-' t- 2,~~ gE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Council of. the City of An.aheim did initiate a veriEied Petition
ror ReclassiLicaciou on r.erlaip reral pruperty si~~ueted in the City of Anaheim Cou •
~range, Stat•e of f;ali£orrita~ described in Lxhibit "A~~ atLached hereto and referred
herein As tFiough set forth i~c rull. + nLy oF
to
. ; and
u WHEREAS, the City Plennin~ Commi
i
`. ~ rs
on did hold a publlc hearing at the Cit
on .1aii. 11, 19; 1 ~t 2;pp o'clock P
M
of A
ioti
,n the Cit
h
~ ,
~ 1 ,
.
y
,na
eim
ce of seid public hearIn havin b ert dui
law and i~ accordance with the provisions of t h e A n a h eim Municipnl Cod
y given as r e q u i r e d by
e vi dence for and
' i e, Chapter 18.72, to hear a
against seid proposed reclassificetion end to Investirate and rt~a4:e fi
~n connection therewith; end nd cnnsider
di
i n
n gs end r e c
omrtren~letions
~ '
'~ ~ WEiEREAS, seid Commission, ofter due inspection, investigation, and study med
half, and after due considerati
b
' e
y itself end in its be-
on of ell evidence and reports offercd et said hearin
following facts:
d
g,
oes find a
nd determine the
?
F 1. Thetthe City Council proposes a re~lassificat
Pr~perty from che Co~xnt~ of Oran e ion of the above deacrib
t
'?~
d
G
A1
~
;; ~
e
~
leim, 12-2.5000
~
~neral Agriculturai I)istrict to the Cit
, OnF-ramily, Zone,
of
l
y
, Tt~ar. sub~ecl. pr°pertY Ls presericiy ~,i~dergu~ng annexario
,`•',ai:e.im,
n to thp ~if
3. Tnat rhe R-2-5000, (~ue-Fam~l;. Gone i~ -Y ~f
~:lle basis t~~at the I~
r
ac~~ended for disa
lem,ir~g Commiss.ion, in recominerdln
h°• 122, de~armined thar. low-densit
eneralp
l
~
r
3
P
an
pmendment
y reside~~tial, u~es would
be
most a
general area, and that ar-y recomm~ndai:ions ma;le
Ppropriate for thi
e~*~iuac
io
'
.
s
ti uf a
ro t.he Count of Oran e
ppropriate den~iti~s for [he arEa Y 8 Prior to the re-
cc•~,sfdered a blt~ding co
i
~
i
r
` mm
tment upox; t}ie City of
Anaheim
for allu~am~~toh~ve to be
4• Tha~ after thorough stud
a
d
y
n
ome.
~Lea} I.t,e ;~lanning (;o~~ssi
re-evaluation of the land „a
f,
, ~
on reconuner.ded that t},i~ -•~uiicy ior this
devel~ ni~~;~ and to recommend R-2-5UOC r
P , a~ea be rPtained for low-~ensit
nni
recomme
~
d
_
;
n
n would bp
ati.on. ~ inconsistent with t5i8
'
;• Previous
~• 1'pet the Ylanr.ing CommLssion does hereby rec
R-l; Sir;g
le-famil
•
,
~
om;nend to the C~t~ ~o
residential
sub'ecc , Goi1e be establisii2c~ .,n suu'ect r- ~ uncil that the
J prope.rty in conformance
i
-
r
w
t
~ thereb
Amendmenr No. 122, y placing
h tiie Getieral Flan as recommended
i
r n
b. That the recommended reclassifi.~^ Gener~l Plan
desirable for the o
atioti ~F sub
ject
d
~
r
erl~
~ arid r-
property is necessary and/or
7. That r?;E
i
n
~
^ rP~
on~mended reclass
fication
subhecc~~nity.
t° thE znt:~a ar~d thei
of
; r permi~red uses locally established in~close dros p~Operly relate
~roperty a;~d ro the zones and their
P ximit
er
c
t
i
y p
y
m
ommur,ity,
o subjQCt
tted uses generally establish
ed thr
ou
hout
h
8
'
; .
g
t
e
. 1
hat- t.tie recommended reclassification of sub,ject propert
arid improveme~ic of abuttici
~ r
uires the dedication
g streets in accordattce with the Girculation Eleme
Cenera1 t~lar., due ~o the anticipaced i
t
i
n
o
f the
ntensiEi.catLon of land use
ncrease i-Y traffic which will be
, .
generared by the
i ~, RD
.+~ I ~ 1'
r __ .... ~~„ ..~ J . .,
`
`~1 ., 'f
-.--
~' ~r... ~.
-, r^~r-.
_ ~
«
~ _
N
. ..;
~ ~ .
;
i
e'
1
r`
; +
~
I
1
~ '
A
..f~
~ I
I i ,
~ i
~ ~' 4ra
i
~ _._ ._.
_ .. _ ._ i
. :. _
, ..~ ~1
,;y ~~ ~,
~~~
. ~ ,~
ES PERANZA ^ CARRILLO ANNEXATION ,~` '~,,,~~ ,~';+ ,,
~*
, ~ y
TO ~ ~-~ ~ r
~
~
'r~.~' ~ `
TI-iE CITY OF ANAHEI:'~I
t3~ginning a~ tha aout'hoasterly corncr o:E that
certain annoxaLion to the City of Ar~~hetm entitled
, "Esperaiiza-Roth"; thenae along the ~asterly line
J of said~annexation being also the easterly ~.ine o~
ths land dQacribec~ in thQ deec! to Samuol Kraemer
' • recorded September 18, 1915 ir- Boak 270, page 7 oE
Deeds, records of 4range Coun~y, North 1° 31' 44"
East, 2, 214.53 feet: to the non-tangert intersec;tion
, wi,t~h a curve in the •southerly line of the Atchison,
To~~eka and Santa Fe Railraad Company right of way,
~ 10(;.OG teet in width, b~ing Concave southeasterty ~
'' anc3 having a radius of 3,769.83 feet, saici 100.00
. ' fout strip bein~ shovm on Oxange County Surveyor's
Fi:le Map No~ 33'6~, sa.id sautherly line being parallel
wit:h and 120.OO.feet southerly from the centerline of
Es~~eranxa Road, as monumented and noted in Orange ~
County Surveyor's Transit Book 105, pages 17 throuah ~
. ~ 20, a xadial line of said curve ~o said ooint bEars
~ • Noi~th 48° 35' S2" West; thence Northeasterly alon~
• sa9.d c:urve and southerly line through a central angle
of 42° .::' .~33" an arc clis~ance of 2,813.38 fee~;
~thence taz~gent to said curve and continuing along ~
sai~i southerly line North 84° 09" gl" ~.as~, 1,131.92
~ fee:t to a tangent curve .concave~ northerly an.d havinr,
•'. . . a radius ot 2,914.93 feet; thence E,:.si:erly a:.ong said
. curve and said sautherly l.ine through a central angle
Page 1 , '~:.;.~.s:-:,, ~
;r,• "i\.
. i/C'^ " ^.li~)
n:
. , ' n r' ', • ~ ` ~ ~ ~'~` f, .. . .. ,' // .
I \ ~ Ll :.1 . ~.. V . ~ .. . ~1-~ ....... ~IF~~.. .~.~~~a.~ i ~ t. ..\~/
~~'~
~
r,
@
.,
., ~
~ ^
~•
~
*
~
~ h\ ` ; M
' ' ~
1 ~
i ~ ~ •.!~'~ ' ~~
J
~speranza-Carrillo Annexat3on
tp '
Tho City of Anah~im
~
1
~
~
C
' oS 12° 2~' 00" an arc dis~ance o~ G33.40 ~eet ti~
the tangent intersec~ion with a couree in said eouth-
crly line, shown as havinq a bearing o~ North 71° 04'
~ 33" East ,on a map ~filed in Book 37, page 33 of •
~ Recorde'o~ SurvQys, records. of said County; th~nae '
along ~ai~d course North 71° 42 '' 41" Ea,st, 1, 508.91
feet to the eas~erl.y line of the proportv described
in~ .Parcel ~1 of a deea to Virginia Richazds, recordec~
September 28, 1960, in Book~ 543E, page 79 of Official
~ Records~o~ said County, s~id easterly tine being
~ • sY-owr~ on said Record of Survey ; thence al.ang said
' eas ter].y lina South 6° 40' 31. 3~" Ea:, t, 1, 286 . 89
. feet to the eoutheast corner of said Richards proper~y;
, thence along the southerl.y line of said Richards •
. ~ property South 62 ° 23.' 49" Wes t, 1, 239.3? feet to an
• ~nterseation with ~a line shAwn as having a bearing •
. ~ ~ of North 29° 22' 00" West, and a length oL 126.53 '
~ ' feet on Orange County Surveyor's File M~p No. 9870,
~ shee~ file number Z8907-C; thence along said line
North 29° 22' 00" West, 12E.53 feet to a non-t~,ngent
~• intersection with a curve, concava southcasterly
'and having a radius cf 10, 220 . 00 feet, as shown on
, said F31~ • Ma~ No: 9870, a radial line nt said curve
• tA said poir,~ bears~ Nerth 19° 44' 07" W~s t; t~~nce •
•'. Southwesterly along said curve through a central
. • .. , angle of 9° 37' 53" an arc d~.s tance o£ 1, 717 .~8 •
. f~et to a tangent line, a~ shown on said File Ma~ '
~ ?~o. 9870; ~hence along said line Sou~h 60° 38' 00"
' • Week, , 3,430.26 feet kv the poi.nt of beginning.
. . ~ ...... , ,.
. '"'~ ~• ~~"" J~r-l.`.~_f ..
„_ ~ .. , . . ., . .. . , ,.,.
, . \1 ~~;
c'
~;
t
~.
a
~
~
, ~..
-`~, _ ~ ,
_._ .. ~ ,~ . ~ r ~.. ~~ „ . air:r:• .
~ . .
h
~~~ i
;
~ _ __.. ~
ti '
R' ..~
~ ~ I30W, TliCRCFORi;, L~; I'1' nCSOLVED that the Anc~',~'.m City Planning Commiseion
dues hexeby recotnmerid o the City Council of the `Lity of Anaheim chs~r. sub~oct
~ Petition far Rnclassif.ication be diaapprovsd on the basis of the foi~egoing
~ findinga.
~" BE IT FURTHf;R RCSOLV1sD that the Y1Rnning Commiseion doea her~by recnm-
mend to the City Council of the City af AnallPim that aub~ect fteclaeaification
~ be appravecl aq amended (R-1 Zone) and, Uy so doing, that Tltle 18-Zc~ning of
~ the Anaheim Municipal Cocle bo amendeci co exclude the above deacriUe property
~ from the A1, GCNGRAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT and to incorporate said cleacribed
property into tt~e R-1~ SINGLC FAMILY RCSIDCNTiAL, ZONG upon t11e f.oll.owing
~ conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to rhe
~ proposed u~e of sub~ect proper[y in order [o preserve the safety and general
: welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim;
~
(1) That a final tract map of sub~ect property ehall be aubmitted
/, '~`~ to and approved by the City Counci.l A11C1 then be recorded in
:;~ the office of the Orange County Recorder.
Y;;~ (2) Prior to the introduct3on of an ordina~ice rezoning aub~ect
,i property, Condition No. 1~ above menti.oned, shall be compleCed. The
.;; provisions or righta granted by thia reaolution shall become null
<;~ and void by action of the City Council unl~~s sald conditions ar.e
,~:~; complied with n+ithin one year from the date hereof, or such further
~`~ time as the City Council may z,rant,.
(3) Th at the owner(s) of sub~ec~ property ehnll pay to the City
of Anaheim the appropr.:[ate park and recreaiioci i«-J.i.eu fe~s
;, aa determined to be appronriate by the City Council, said fees to be
paid at the time the buildin~ permit is issued.
t~' (4) That these reclasaificati.on proceedings are granted aub~ec to
~~'~ completion of anne.;ation of sub~ect property to the City of Anaheim.
'~
~.~,~~, (5) That sub~ect property sh~.ll be developed in accordance with the
~
't~' standards of the Scenic Corridor Overl~ y Z o n e s e t for t h as fo l lowe:
.~~~ 1) Thal• prior to the introduction of an ordinance reclaasifying
~..a sub~ect prooer.ty, a specific plan shall Ue required for any
i;~ use, subdivision, site design or the construction oF any
;:b: building, fence, sign or structure, or the remova~ or deposit
~_°.`,~', of natural material, Plans shall be submitted indicating
~~ front, cide, and rear elevations, plan vieu~ and a cross sec-
tlon through the proposal and through sufricient ad~acent
,~
i~ properties to indicate the relationship of the proposal to
,.~ thuse properttes. Plans or drawings should also show pro~
,, posed building or structure locations, and in reasonable
"~ detail ~~glls, walks, topography, existing vegetation, proposed
#~; parking layout and loc~tian, landscape and irrigakion pro osals
i ;". P ~
.;~ building and roofing materials and color scheme.
Z) All buildings alor.g La Palma Avenue, A.T. & S.F. Railroad
right-of-way and Fairmont Boulevard, shall maintain a
landscaped setback area having a minimum depth of 50 feet.
Said setbacks shall be measured horizontally from the
planned highway right-of-way lines as inclicated on the
Circulation ~lement of the Gener.al Plari to the building.
' I;~ 3) The entire required setba~k area except where driveways cross said
~ ;^;i;; areas shnll be landscaped as follows: landscaping shall consist
`~ ot l
~
;
+ awn, trees, shrubs, ground cover and certain architectural
;~
features as listed below. All landsca~ed areas shall be rerman-
~;
~ ently maintained in a neat and orderly manner as a conditton of
~
. ~ use and shall be provided cvith hose tibbs, sprinklers, or similar
, r~ permanent irrigation facilities.
,,,
~a` The following architectural f~atures, structures, and accessways
~ may be permitted in the required setback area:
~
.,
~ a. Fountains, ponds, pools, sculpture, planters and walkways
(open or covered) where they are an integral part of a land-
scaping scheme comprised primarily of plant materials.
' b. Decorative screen type walls.
a
~ c. Flag poles. (riaximum of 25 feet in height)
~
, RES
;,~ OLUTION N0. 3
L~
~.
n~
~
f
4) Where a building eite is ad~acenC to tl~e A.T. & S.F, Railroad
rigtit-of-wa,y a eolid decorative masonry wa11, en narthen Uerm
or combination of the t~oa ehal]. be provided paralle]. to the
right-o£-way l.ine . The wall or berm ^hnll. be at leaf~t ei~: (6)
fe~t high us measured from the hiFh gr~de aide of th~~ prop~rty
l.ine. In order to insure privacy to the dwe111ng un:lta a wall
or berm in exceas of c~ix (6) feet in he:Lght may be approved.
Adequate ].andecaping to fully screen to a height of ten (10)
£eet the aub~ect property from viow of passersby witliin two
(2) years, shall be provided ad~acent to the right-of-way line.
5) Where a prospective building site and/or subdivieioti conCaina
a Eucalyptus tree windbreak the developer ah~ll either: (1)
leave the windbreak in its natural atate; (2) prune the treea to
heigtit of not lesa tl~an 25 Fcet, or; (3) remove the exiAting treea
and replaGe them, one tree £or every three trees(not necessarily
in Che eame location) with windbreak substitute treea, Treea sha~l
be at least eiRht (8) feet in height at the time of planting.
6) All natural terrain or ureas left in an undisturbed state aha11
contain or shal]. be planCed w:tth adenuate native plant material.
An irrigation sys tem shal.l not be required for theae natural areas .
7) All cut or fill slopea ehall be planted with adequaze p1~onC materiale,
and irrigated with an irrigation aystem to protect the alopes agains t
erosion. Said p].anting shall conaist of at le~st one (].) tree per
300 square feet and one (1) shrub per 150 square feet of actual bank
slope area and a ground cover to completely cover the bank within
two (2) years from C~1P time of ~lanting.
~ ~
\
w
~
, 8) The maximum overall height of aiiy building shall be 25 feet measured
from the highest porti.on of str.ucture to the highest finiahed grade
level at the foundation. Maximum height limitations may be varied
up or down in ordPr to insure that the proposal does not impair the
, view from ad ~ acen t lo ts or from the a ceni c highway .
9) Roof m~unted e ipment including exterior mounted and ground mounted
radio and tele~~-~si~,n antennas shall, not be permitted.
10 ) That Condit ion Nos ,(3) ,(4) , and (5) , above mentioned shall be
; complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
;
1
RESOLUTION N0. 3
,..~a. .
ti
~
_ n,
, ~
-•~
~,.,~~
w
1
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and Approved by me thIs 21at day of Januar ig]
Y, 1.
~s-r ~ ~
; ~.
_ ~.
CHAiRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~
~ '~ , ~~1 9
'' SECRETARY ANAH IM CITY PI.ANNING COMN(xSSION ~ ~
~
~ i STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
; COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Ss, ~
CITY OF ANqHE~M ~ ~
~ T, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plavnin Ccmmi:•sion ;f + ~
~; going resolut~on was pessed end edopted 3t fl meetgn of the Cit~, ~ he City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
,~ Januery 11, 1971, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by&he foliowing,vote of~the m m~bers thereof: City oE Anaheim, held on ~
~' •'~YES: COMMIS3IONERS: Allred, Farano ~
~ , Gauer, Herbet, Kaywood, Seymour. ~
~ ` N(2~5; COMMISSIaNERS: Rowland. ~
~ ~
- a
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None. ~
~ ~
i
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this ~
, 21st day of January, 1971,
~
~ //~
~2~~~~~ ~ ~
I `.~ ~
' SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
s ~ RESOLUTION N0. 3 ~
, R2. ~
-2- :a
s
i
. ~
3
~ s
t
~ 1
i ~
1 ~
i
` ~
.;,r
• (.r-~iia„ . x~r . :x . . . .~
__ _• .._ , .._ .' . ..,~.~~. ,+.'Rcc,,,r-.. _ ~
~ . , _ .. ~,
` ' ... er '
`