PC 71-77, , ., _ . _. . _ _ ;
i ~Z ,~ }
RESOLUTION N0, PC71-'77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNINd COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION ~OR VARWNCE N0. 2248 BE APPROVEU
WHEREAS, the Clty Plannln~ Commission of the Clty oE Anaheim did recelve a verlfied Petitlon for VerlancQ from
Mi:SSRS, OGATA AND WEnCR, 1095 North Main StreeC, Suit~ S, Orange, California 92667, Ownera;
LLONAttI) SMIT.H, 125 South Claudina Ave. Anaheim, California 92805, Agent o£ certain real
property situated in the City of. Anaheim, Count.y o~ Orange, State of Ca~ifornie, deacribed
` as Parcel 1; rhe We~l 132,00 feet of the East 396.~0 feet of thQ Northweat quarter of rhe
Northeasr quarter of the Noreheast quarter of Section 24, Townehip 4 South, Range 11 Weat, in
,'';i the Rancho Los Coyotea, as per map recorded in Book S1, page 11 of Miacellaneoua Mapa, in
'-;`?s the ofCice of the County Recorder of said County, PArcel 2: The Weat 132.00 feet of the Eaet
,~~;; 264.00 Feet of rhe Northweat quarter of the NoXtheaet quarter of the Northeast quarter of
,~;~; Section ?.4, Township 4 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as per map recorded
`r~~I tn Boolc 51, page 11 oE Miscellaneous Mapa, in the of£ice of the Courity Recorder of said
` :4~}J/',
~,.;~~. County.
. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiesion did hold a public headng et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
~- April 19, 1971, et7: 30 o'clock P.M., notice oE said public hearing heving been duly given es required by
~ 1~ law end in eccordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and againat said proposed variance and to investiQate and make findings end recommendations in connectlon therewith;
i • and
WHEREAS, said Commisslon, efter due inspection, inveatigation, end study made by itself and in its behelf,
and efter due cuneidecetion of ell evidence and reports otfered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petiiioner requests a variance from the Anoheim Municipel Code as follows:
a. SECTION 18.28.050(3) - Dtinimum required floor area. (700 squaze feet
required; 550 square feet proposed).
b. SECTIQN 18.28.050(S-b) - Minimum building height within 150 feet uf. single
family zoned property. ~,One-storY permitted; Cwo-
atory proposed).
c. SGCTION 18.28.050(6-b) - Mi.ni.mum reqiiir.ed distance hetween bui.ldings. (39
feet required, 35 feet proposed; 20 feet required,
14 feet proposed).
~~
~ -
~
~~
2. That the petitioner proposes to develop a 110-uniC one and two-story aParttnenl complex.
3. ThaC waiver 1-a, above mentioned, is hereby granted on that basis that a similur waiver
had been granted other. spa•tment developments where no more than 10% of the units were proposed
Eor bachelor ~inits.
4. That waiver 1-b, above mentioned, is hereby granted on the basis that the waiver
applies to the R-1 pronerty to the south in the City of Stanton, a:~d the regulations of that
r,ity requi.re only a 50-foot separation between two-story apartments and a singlp-f.amily re~i-
dential zone, and ehat a similar waiver was granted the property to the west.
5. That waiver 1-c, above mentioned, is hereby granted on the basis that the proposed
plans indicate no windo~rs were proposed on walls facing each other.
6. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to
the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
7. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and en3oyment of a sub-
stantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied
to the property in question.
8. ThaC the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the praperty or improvement~ Ln such vicinity and zone in whi~h the proFerry
is located.
:.,., :
.
,
~
~,
~
.... ' . ~ .. _....,. ~.~... .
. .~ . . ....... .... .... ..
NOW, TN~Rfs~'ORE, HE IT RESQLVED that the Anahoim C1ty planning Commlas~on does he~eby g~nnt sub)ect
Petitlon foi V~rionc~, upon the foll~wing condlktona which a~e hereby found to be a noe;ossety prerequisite to the pto-
posrd 119C of the subJect property in o~der to preserve the sefety and general welFare ot the Citizens nf the Clty of
Anehelm,
1, 'i'I~at lfiis varibnce i.s gr.anted sub~ecC tn the completion of 12ecla~eificati.on No.
10- : 1-44, naw pendi~:g,
2. 'I'11nt sub,ject property ahall Ue developed s~lbatantially in accordance with plana and
spec.i.l:i.cationa ot~ file wi.th the City of Anahe~m, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and S.
'i. Tf~at Conditian yo. 2, above mentioned, ahall be compiied with prior to final
b~~ildin~; ancl zoning inapectiona,
' THE FOREGOING RFSOLUTION is signed and app~oved by me this 29th day of April, 1971,
i
'i
i : 1
! ~ ~ /
., ~ ~ _ . ~
-C~IAIRMAN ANAHEIM C`Y't Y pLpNNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
L-~-~ Z-x 1 aZc ~ -
SECRETARY ANAyEIM CITY YL- qN(VIN~ COMMISSION
STATE ON CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGF ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
t' A°n KrebR ~ Secretary oE the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, dc hereby certify that the f
going resoLution was passed and adopted at a meetirg of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held n
Apr11 19, 1971, at 7:30o'clack P.iN,, by the following vote of the members theteof:
AYE'S: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Seymour.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: i:ay~ood.
A~35~NT: COhih1ISSI0NERS: howland.
~l
IN WITIvESS WFiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 29th day oF April, 1971.
RESOLUT'IQN N0. 77
~ L 7~r_ r : ~~Z,.! Gc..1 /
SECRETARY ANAH~IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ i;~ V2-G
' ~ -2-
~ :~
,,, ..,..,.,,~ . ~;~.x.,.-, . _
. ~ • . , . -
.. ~,