PC 71-83RESALUTION N0, PC71-83
A RCSOLUTION OF TliE CITY PLANNIN4 COMMISSInN OF' THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO T'HE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAFIEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSiFICATION NO. ~~"71'~L BE APPROV~D IN NART
WHEREAS, the City Plenning (:ommisston of the City of Aneheim dld recelve a vorif3ed Petition for Re-
clessification f~om URI3AN REALTX, INCORP~ .~'PCD, Box 2067, Fullerton, Cali fornia 92633, Owner;
AL~RED D. PAINO, 711 South Beach Boulevard, Anahcsim, California 92804 , Agent o£ certain
real properey aituated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
deacr.ib~d as the Easl-crly 340.00 feet oL- the South 140 feet of the EasC one-half of the
NorCheast quartez of the Southeast quarter of Section 14, in Townehip 4 South, Range 11
Weat, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as ahown on a Map thereof rer.orded in book 51, page 7,
et seq., Dtiscellaneoua Meps, recorda of saicl Orange County, EXCEPTING Tk1ERErROM the
Easterly 40 feet of said land, ae conveyed to the State ot California by deed recorded
March 5, J.951, in book 2153, page 254, Official Records, and by dced recorded March 1,
1951, in book 2151, page 460, ~fficial Recorda.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plennin~ Cammission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on May ', 1971, at 200 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Munlcipel Code, Chapter 18.72. to hear and consider
evidence for and egainst aeid proposed reclessification and to investigate end meke findings and recommendations
in connection thecewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commis~ion, after due inspection, fnvestigetion, end study made by itself and in its be-
half, and after due consideration of all evidence end reports offered et said hearing, does find end determine the
Eollowing Eacts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclessificetion oE the ebove described property fro-n the R-3, Multiple
Family Residential, Zone to the C-1, General Commercial, Zone.
2. That the proposed reclassification is substsntially in conformance with the
Anaheim General Plan.
3. That the proposed reclassification of sub~ect property is necessary and/or
desirable for rhe orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed recla °.fication of subject property does properly relate
to the zones and their permitted uses locally establiahed in close prox{~nity to subject
property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally establishe' throughout
the community.
5. That the oroposed reclassification of sub~ect property zequires the improvement
of abutting (streets/alleys) in accordance with the Circulation Element of the Ceneral
Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensi-
fication of land uae.
6. That the Planning Commioaion recommends that only the front 300 feet of subject
property be reclassified to the C-1 2one, bec ~use there is a need to provide a vehicular
circulation system to serve other deep parcels to the north and to tt-ie west, which raill
probably develop for residential purposes, and this circulat.ion system is dependent upon
the rentention of the street Lhat has already been dedicated across the rear of 4ubject
property.
7. That 4 letters were received in favor of the proposed reclassification and the
use proposed.
EI ~•
~ 1~
~: ~
~ ' 'r;~ RD
~ * ~I;
„+fyt: t}~
~. , ..
-1-
~
h
i
__ ........ ..... ~_
NOW, TyEREFORE, 8~ 17 ~~SOLVED th~t th~ An~heim Clty Pl~nn `~ )Commle~lon doss hereby tscommend
to the Clty Council of the Clty ~, An~heim th~t subJect Petltlon foe Recl~s.,tlcetlon be approved pnd, by so doinR,
thak Title 18-Zoning of the Anahelm Municlp~l Code be amended to exclude the obove deecrlbed property from the
R-3, Multiple Family lteaidentiel, Zone, and tn incorporate said deacrlbed properCy inro
I:l~e C-1, General Commercial, Zone, upon the f'o1lowLng conditiona wt~ich are hereby found
to be a necessary prerequ•leire to the proposed uae nf sub ect
the safety end general welfare of ~he Citizens af. L•he Ciry of AnaheimY in order to presarve
1, That aidewalks ahall bo inatall~d along Be~ch IIoulavard es required by the CiCy
Engineer an~ in accordance with atandard plans and apecificationa on file in the o£fice of
the City Engineer.
2. That t rash Atorago areas shall be provided in accordance with epproved plana on
Lile with t:he office of the Director of Public Worka,
3. That fire hydzante ehall Ue inetalled ae required and determined ro be necessary
by the Chie£ of the Fire Aepartment.
4. That s ubject property sh~ll be aerved by undergrouitd uL•ilitiea.
5. That Condition Nos, 1, 2, 3 and 4, ebove mentioned, ahall be complied with prior
to final building and zoning inepections.
~,j THE FOREGOING RESOL,UTION is signed and epproved b me this
~~ Y 13th day of May, 1971.
- i ~^
- -- ~ ,.,
__ - ~ -- -
j CHAIRMAN AIVAHCTM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
, AT.TEST:
~•
, ,
`~ ' ~Z~L~(~ L, .~_
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 88,
2 CITY OF ANAHEIM )
4
~
z I, l~nn Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning CommissIon o[ the C:ity of Anaheim, do hereb
, the ioregoing resolutinn was passed end edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneh '
held on May 3, 1971, Y certify that
~~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the fol.lowing vote oE the mrmbers thereof: eim,
~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst Ka
, ywood, Row.and, Seymour.
NOES: CQMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ferano.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13l•h day of May, 1971.
~
~ ,~ RESOLUTION ~10. 83
k'! 1~
t~ ~
R2-A
~
Z 'J-~',_i" ~,i~`~%
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
~,•.~,~;.,,
+ ` tR~"~; „.
d ~ ~
t
n
~
' e.