PC 71-88.. ........... ;. . _....
^~~OLUTION N0. PC71-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF' THE CITY 0~ ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARYANCE N0, 2252 BG DCNIED
WHEREAS, the City Plannin~ Comml~wion of the Clty uf Anehelm did receive e verlfled Petitlon for Verience from
RONALD H. AND CHARLOTTE RHODES, 9301 Thistle Road, Anaheim, California 92d04,
Ownersi JOSE;PEiINE B LOP~2, 3136 "B" Weat Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California
92904, Agent, af ce~~tain real proper~y situated in tha City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of Calif.ornia, desaribed as Lot No. 30 of Trac*. No. 403.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commieaion did holc: a public hearing at the City Hell in the Clty of Anaheim on
; May 11, 1971, et Z;00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing aeving been duly given ec required by
; 1ew and in actordanco with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.6a, to hear and consider evidence for
~~ and egainst seid proposed variance end to inve~ti~ate and make findinge end recommendetions in connection therativith;
~ end
WHEREhS, sa9d CoTmission, efter due inspection, invesUgetion, and s. idy mede by itself end in its behelf,
and after due conaldecation of ell avidence and reporte offered at said hearing, does find snd rictermine the following
fects:
1. That t}~e petitioner requeats a veriance from the Aneheim Municipal Code ea follows:
SECTION 18,62.090(b-1) - Minimum distance between a free-atanding si n and a
roof ei.kn. (300 feet required; approximately 30 feer
propnsed),
2. That the peritian~r pr.oposea to legalize an existing roof aign located approximately
30 feet from an existing free-standing sign.
3, That no hardship was ahown to warrant granting tt~e requested waiver.
4. That the petitioner did not submit evidence that the pr.operty was being denied ~
privilege enjoyed by other property in the general area.
5. That the owner of the property allocated all o£ the legally permitCed fr.ee-standing
sign area to a aingle tenant; thus depriving the other tei~ants of sign space.
6. That approval of this roof sign w~uld establish an undesirable precedent for similar
requests on small shopping centers thro~ighout the City.
,.
~i
.t~
i ~
V 1-D
-1-
~ ~I
~"Mwiw .~ .~ . . j~ ~ ~ .. ..y~~,
.... . ~ ~
-~ • ~~ • ~ 1- '~~.a ' ' . .
. ~ 1
~ M
i
, _ ,... . . .. ,,,.. ,....
~
.
~~ `
h~ `i'S,
~ ~ .~~
I ~~?2~
~1' . ~~i//,~i
~ J t..:,
~
,-•,
L
NOV.~, T'iEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Clty Plenning Commisaiort doea hereby ueny subject
Petition for Varience on the basis of the aforementioned findinga.
v~~ THE FORECOING RESOLUTION ls signed . nd apprc.~~ed Sy me this 27th day of May, 1971.
~
`~ ` j
,,n+ ''W~~~~:sM•1•'_Q : ~f//~f i~rh~I~~".
~~~~ CfiAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-; ATTEST:
~ ~ ~'
(~- -~1~L-?'C ' ~ ~ . ~i-~.
~ SECRETAF2Y ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
,?#
; 'i~; STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
j COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. •
' CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~ `;{
,~
' ~ I, Ann Kreba, ,Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby cedify thet the fore-
;~;., going resolution wus passed end ad~pted at e meeting of the City i~lenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
~ May 17, 19 i 1, xt 2:00 o'clock P,M„ by the following vate og the members thereof:
~
~~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour.
;
,t
z. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None .
' ;~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
;~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h~ve hereunto se; my hand this 27th dAy of May, 1971.
~ .,
~ .~
;;~. ~~?2~-v~ ~j/ : ~_._
;'~ SECRETARY ANAHE?M CITY PLANNING' CnMMISSION
~ RESOLUTION N0. 88
,~ '
~ V2-D .2_
~~ k
;i
` ,.i
p a 1
~~
~ 4
i~
~ ~ • r.
~ ~ ~
~ ~ y
. ~ r ~rva.. ~ . .'.•},t ~~
r ~ . .....,;a.1 ~ . . . 'awwwava wn. w~eaa~te.~ .q,:...,i~ ~
.. ..„:. . ,. _..
, .,.. ;3 ` '. '~"' , ., . ~~
. ~ 1~ ~
~ _..