PC 72-105~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-105
A RESOLUTIOII (:F THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL i15E PERMITNO, 1309 BE DENIED
R'HEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of AnaSeim did .receive a verified Petition for Con-
ditional Use Permit from ROY W. MABEE, 841 South Western Avenue, Anaheim, California 92804,
Owner; JOSEPH E. BONADIMAN AND ASSOCIATES, 1265 Kendall Drive, San Bernardino, California
92407, Agettt of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County.of Orange,
State of California, described as follows: That portion of the West half of the Southeast
quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 4 South, Range 11 west, S.B.B.d~i.,
d~scribed as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said West half, t4ence North
0 05' 04" East 586.66 Feet along the Easterlyline of said West half, thence West parallel
to the Southerly line of said West half, 150.46 feet, thence South 586.66 feet to a point
in the Southerly line of said West half, said point being 189.60 feet West of the South-
east corner of said West half, thence East 189.60 feet along said Southerly line of said
West half to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom the Southerly 40 feet. Also
Excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the Orattge County Flood Control District by
deed recorded May 10, 1960 in Book 5251 page 296 of Official Records
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
nn May 15, 1972, et 7: 30o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law and in accordence with the provisions oEthe Maheim Municipel code, Chapter 18.64,to hear
end consider evidence for and against said proposed conditionel use and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspectlon, investigetion, and study made by itselt end in its be-
helE, and after due consideratian of all evidence anfi reports ofEeced et seid hearing, daes find and determine the
fo!'.owing fects:
1. TSet the proQosed use is groperly one for which e Conditionel Use Permit is euthorized by Code
Section 1~3.64.020(2-d) to wit: esCablish a travel trailer park.
2. That the propoaed uae will adversely affect the ad,joining land uaea and the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the noises asaociated with trailers being hitched, unhitched, etc. durir.g
houca of arrival or departure(late at night cr early in the morning) would be detrimental
to the general health and welfare of the adjoining residential uses.
4. That the petitioner is providing leae buffering between the proposed use and the
reaidential use than is required where multiple famSly and single family uses abut each
other.
5. That one person appeared in oppoaition.
CI-D • 1-
, . ~
~
.~
NOW, THEREFORE, B~ IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planaing Commieslon does hereby decy subject
Petttion for Cor.ditionel Use Pe:mit on the basis oE the afotemeatioaed fiudinga.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed ead epproved by me i 25th da of May, 1972.
CHA AN ANAHEIM CITiI PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
L-l~/ i~~ZC.iu~-J
SECRET'ARY ANAHEIM C1TY PI.ANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNlA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as.
CTfY OF ANAHEIM )
I, F.nn ~Y.rebs.,, Secrotary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anehetm, do hereby certiEy. thet the fora
going resolution wea passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenaing Commission ofthc City of pnahelm, held on
May 15, 1972, at I: 30 o'clock P.M., by the followiag vote of the members tbereof:
AYES: C06:MISSIONERS: HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMNeISS'IONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WI1'NESS WHEREOF, I have hereuato set my hend thie 25th day of May, 1972.
RESOLUTION NO.PC72-105
Gi~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
C2-D -2-