PC 72-113RESOLUTIO~ O. PC72-113 ~
A RESOLUT:.DN OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMME:NDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICkTION NO. 71''2-48 HE APPRCVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim ~'id receive a verified Petition for ReclassiEice-
tionfcom LEO ROSE, 375 San Palo Place, Pasadena, California 91107, Owner; CARL KARCHER
ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, 1200 North Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92801, Agent
of certain real property aituated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as The North 288 feet of the Northwest qur+rter of the Northweat
quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 13, in Township 4 South, Range 11 Weat, in
the Rancho Los Coyotea, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 51, page 7, et seq.,
Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County; EXC~PTING THEREFROM the East 524 feet
thereof. AI~SO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the North 66 feet thereof. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM
that portion described as follows: Beginning at a point in L•he North line of the herein
described land, distant Easterly 60 feet from the West line of said Northeast quarter;
thence Westerly to said West line; thence Southerly 20 feet; thence Easterly, parallel
with the North line of said land 40 feet; thence Northeasterl,y in a direct line to the
point of beginning
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning ComR~ission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the Clty of Aneheim on
May 31, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to Feer and consider evidence
for end ageinst said proposed reclessification and to investigetr and meke findings end recommendetions in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study ciede by itself and in its behelf, and
efter due conslderetion of ell evidence end repods offered et seid heering, does find end determine the follo•Hing facts:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a reclasslficetion of thr. above described property from the
R-A, AGRICULTURAL, 7.ONE to the C-1, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, ZONE.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in conformance wi.th the laiid uae designation
of the General Plan.
3. That the proposed reclessificetion of subject property is necessary end/or desireble torthe orderly end pro-
pe: development .:f the community.
4. Thet the proposed reclessificetion of subject property does properly relete to the zones end their permitted
uses locally established in close proximity to subject property end to the zones end thefr permitted uses generally esteb-
llshed throughout the community.
5: That the proposed reclaseification ie a condition of approval of a building permit
to expand the existing restaurant.
R-A -1-
NOW, '('[~[EREFORE, B~ IT~ OLVED thet the Aneheim City Planni ommiasiou doc~ he:eby tcoommend
to the City Council oE the City o3~lCneheim that aubiect PeUtion for Recles~cetion be appioved end, by so doing, ti
thet Title 18-Zoning oE the Aneheim Municlpa! Code be amended to exclude the ebove desc:lbed pmperty from the
R-A, AGRICULTURAL, ZONE and to incorporate said described property into the C-1, GENERAL
COMMERCIAL, 20NE upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary pre-
requisite to the propased use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and geieral
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
(1) That trash storage areas ahall be provi3ed in accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Direciar of Public Works.
(2) That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary
by the Chief of the Fire Department.
(3) That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly ahielded from view, and
the auund buffered from adjacent properties.
(4) That subjecC property shall be served by underground utilities.
(5) That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satiefactory
to the City Engineer.
(6) That a 6-foot masonry wall ahall be constructed along the south property line.
(7) That subject property shall be develeped substantially in accordance with plans
and specificationa on file aith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1.
(S) That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and e~pcoved by me this 9th day of June, 1972.
CHA RA:AIZ/ANAHEIM CITY NNING C SSION
PRO TEM
ATTEST:
~~~/nirt~ ~~S%2,[/r~C/ _.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CIT7 PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) gs~
CITY OF ANAHGIM )
I, Ann Krebe, Secretary of the City Plenning Commissian of the Clty of Meheim, do hereby certify thet
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City af Anaheim,
held on May 31, 1972 et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote af the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONB,
ASSENT: COMMIS$IONERS: FARANO,
IN WITNESS WHEkEOF, I heve hereunto set my hend thls 9th day of June, 1972.
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-113
li~~~i~~;~z/.c~e./
SECRET~RY ANAIiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
R2-A -2.