PC 72-12~
~
RF.SOLfJTION NO. p~~2-? 2 -
A RLSOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMIS3ION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITIUN FOR VARIANCE NO. 2324 BE GRANTED IN PART
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance
from LAWRENCE A. MUCKENTHALER, 1530 Avolencia Drive, Fullerton, California
92632, Owner; PANAMINT CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., P. 0. Box P, Newport Beach,
California 92660, Agent, of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of orange, State of California, described as that portion of
the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section
9, Township 4 South, kange 10 *Aest in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana,
as per map recorded in Book 51, Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office
of.the County Recor3er of said county, described as follows: Beginning at
the Sontheast corner of said South half; *_hence West along the South line of
said South half to the Southeast corr~zr o= the land described in the deed to
H. Leroy Hall et ux., recorded March 13, 1930 in Book 360 Page 385 of official
records; thence North along the Ea~,t line of said land of Hall and along the
East line of Parcel 1 of the land described in the deed to Floyd D1. Hatfield
et ux., recorded April 25, 1935 i.n Boqk 745 Page 446, of official records, to
the North line of said South haZf; thence East along said North liae to the
Nortneast coraer of said South half; thence South along the East line of said
South half to the point of beginning. EXCEPT the North 230.00 feet thexeof.
ALSO EXCEPT that portion th~reof described in a deed to Lawrence A Muckentha7er,
Jr., et al., recorded December 31, 1968 in Book 6834 Page 117, of official
records ; end
WHEREAS, tha City Plenning Commission did hold a public 6caring at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
o~ Januarp 24, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearingheving been duly given es required
by lew and in eccordnnce with t}~e provisions of the A.neheirn Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68,to hearand coaside:
evidence fac and egairest said proposed veri~nce end to investigete and make findings end recommendetions in connec-
tion therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commissinn, efter due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself end in its behalf,
and efter due consideretion of all evidencc and cepods oEfe:ed at sald heacing, does find and determine the Eollowing
Eects:
1. That the petitioner cequests e vaciance from the Aneheim Municipal Code as follows:
a. SECTION 1II.2$.050(S-a) - Maximum building height. (Two stories permitted;
three etories proposed)
b. SECTION 18.32.050 21 - Minimum building site area per dwelling unit. (1~L'78
square feet per unit proposed; 1 200 equare feet per
unit required)
c. SECTION 18.28.050(11) - Maximum wal]. heiRht in the front aetback. (6 feet
proposed; 42 inched permitted)
2. That the petitioner proposes development of aubject property with a 182-unit three-
sr.ory apartment complex.
3. That Waiver 1-b, above mentioned, is hereby deriied on the basis that the property ia
of sufficient sixe to meet minimum Code requirements for square fooeage per unit, and the
petitioner had not demonatrated that a hardship would exiat if r.his waiver were not grauted.
Q, That there are exceptionel or~$xte9O zovedciccumstances or conditions epplicable to the property involved
or to the intended use o: the property/t at ~opnot epply generally to the propecty or cless of use in the seme vicinity
and zone. as a rove
5. Thet the requested variance/is ne~ePssery ~or the pceservation end enjoyment of e substantial properly right
possessed by other property in the se;ne icinit~ ed:d zone, end denied to the property in question.
6. That the r.quested verience/wBll~i~o~rbe materially detrimental to the public welfate or injurious to the pmp-
edy or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the oroperty is located.
V1-G -1-
~ ~ in part
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED thet the Aneheim Clty Plec~ni!tg Commission doas heceby grant/subject
Petition Eor Veriance, upon tbe following conditions which ace hereby found to be e necessary prerequisitc :o the pro-
posed cse of the subject pcoperty in ocder to pceserve the seEety end genecel welfece of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
(1) That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassific&tion No.
71-72-27, now pending.
(2) That aubject property ahall be developed subatantially in eccordance with plens
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, pro-
vided, however, that sufficient dwelling units shall be deleted from the development in
order that a minimum of 1,200 square feet of land is provided for each remaining unit.
THE FOREGOING RESOL"JTION is si~ed and app:oved by me thia 3rd day of February , 1972.
i ~
CHAIRMAN AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~
SECR~TARY ANAHE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE O~' CALIFORIVIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) e8•
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ~
T, Ann Krebs , Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Aneheim, do hereby certify that
the focegoing resolution wes passed end edopted et a meeting af the City Plenning Con~mission of the City oE Anahelm,
held on J an uary 2 4, 19 7 2 r at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSE6NERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ASSENT: COMMISSIONEFtS: NONE.
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: SEYMOUR.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hnve heceunto set my hand this 3rd day o f February , 19 72 .
RESOLUTIONNO. P~~Z-12
~-~.~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G "7"