PC 72-158~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC 72-158
A RESOLllTION OF TfiE CI'fY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2382 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiasion oE tha City o£ Anaheim did receive u verlfied Petition for Varience from
CLARK WALTER and NANCY JANE WINGERT JR., Post Office Box 24, Vida, Oregon 97488,
Owners; J. W. KLUG DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INCORPORATED, 4540 Campus Drive, Newport
Beach, California 92660, Agent, of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, and described in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full.
WHEREAS, the City Plnnning Commieslon did hold a public headng at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
July 10, 19~Z et 2:00 o'clock P.Dt., notice oE seid publlc hearing heving been duly ~ven es required by
lew end in accardence wlth the provtsions of the Maiteim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
end egalnat aeid pcopoaed vorience n.nd to lnvestigeta end make Eindings end recommendetions in connectlon thecewlth;
en~
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investlgetion, end study made by ltselE end !n ita behelf,
and efter due conaideration of ell evidence and cepotts offered at seld 'nearing, does flnd end deteimine the following
fects:
1. Thet the petltioner requeste var i ances f rom the Anahe i m Mun i c i pa 1 Code as fo 1 1 ows:
Portion A
a. SECTION 18.80.u90 - Minimum floor area. (~25 square feet required; 12
sq~are feet proposed)
Portion :1
b. SEC'ilOh; 18.28•030 - Permitted accessory uses. (Recreational vehicle storage
yard proposed; recreation~l vehicle storage area not
permitted) _ _ .
family residential zone. (One-story required; two stories
proposed)
d. SECTION 18.04,090(2-q) - Maximum wall heiqht in the setback. (42 inches
permitted; u feet proposed)
2, That the petitioner proposes to develop Portion A with 16 R-2-5000 single family
homes; and that Portion B is proposed to be developed with a 70-unit statutory condomi~ium
in addition ~c a 14-space recreational vehicle ~torage area.
3. That since the reclassification of subject property has been recommended for dis-
approval the proposed petition could not be utilized within the development standards of
the er.isting zoning.
4. That considering the Commission and Council action on the adjacent property to the
so~~t'.i, waiver 1(c) is totally inappropriate.
5. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property involved or to the intended use of the proper•ty that do not appl'~ generally
to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
o. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
and denied to the property in ~uesti~n.
Vl-D -1-
, o ~ :.
~~:ni:i,t i.r ti ~1~T~~~~~',`~A„
'I~li~~ rsi:;tc ur it:l..rctl in 16~• l:itt~l Jr.~ ril~• ~. ~a' n•I~'r:•i•~l 1,~ in titi- ~ch~•~lul~~ cnt~•rr~l Lti :lii. rcporl i-:
a i'~~..
'fitic to ~~id c: t:ilc or inlcrc-l at thc dalc h~•n~uf i~ ~•r<~rvl in:
CT,flRY, t), !/7'?CF,RT, JR., as Lc a:: undi~~ic:~d :evcn-ci.r.hus (7/8) intcres~,
tu:1 11Ai:C1 i~:f:,~ui;i;'xs a~ to ~.n und:ivi^.eci c*.~,~-~iLhLh (1/3) i~<<.crest.
TENTATIVE TItACT N0. 65u9
po t~.: s- ~ o N d~ --l
FgT~.s (Portion within proposed R-2/5000)
That portion of the south one-half of the norCheast quarter of Section 12,
Township 4 South, Range 10 k'est, in the Rancho San Juan Ca~on de Santa
Ana, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, SCate of California, as per
map filed in book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneoue Ziaps, in ttie office of the
County Recorder oE said County, described ns follows:
Beginning at a point in the south line of the north one-half of esid south
~tte-half of the northeast quarter, distant thereon North 89° 52~ 10" EasC,
289.00 feet from the west line of eaid northeast quarter, being Lhe center
line of Sunki.st Street, said point being the beginning of ~ non-Cangent
curve concave easterly and havin~ a radius of 450.00 feet, a radial line
of said curve to last said point bears South 83° 52~ 09" East;
thence southerly, along said curve, through a cent:al angle of 20° 56' 13",
an arc distance of 164.44 feet to a point of cusp wiCh a curve concave
southerly and havin~ a radius of 452.00 feet;
thence easterly. along last said curve, through a central angle of 22° 00' 33",
an arc distance of 173.63 feet;
thence, tangent to last said curve, North 89° 52' 10" East, 573.00 feet to
r.he beginning of a non-tangent curve concave westerly and having a radius af
350.00 feet, a radial line oP last said curve ~o its point of beginning
bears South 68° 40' S1" East;
thence northerly, ulong last said curve, through a cenCral angle of
4° 37' 32", an arc distance of 28.26 feet;
thence Nortti 89° 52' 10" East, 135.16 feet to Che westerly line of the land
described in book 8659~ page 698 of Official Recorda of snid Orange County;
thence, along last said westerly line, NorCh 6° 31' 29" East, 102.00 feet
to the said soutli line of the north onc:-half of the south one half of the
northeast quartrr; ~ o~ q ~~
thence, along last described south line, South 89° 52' 10" West,°859~bt'feet
to the puint of beginning.
~2,.~1A 1516 ~~~q,
~O'~1 ~~ ~O '
~~
~ ~UN 19~~o N ~
~ ~
s R c~r ~ w 2
,t
+ n(~ 2 3 z~
\c, pJ`c,ON ~:+~ ~Y51\~AhCE N4.
, P3s~ ~ ~ " J.N. 454
~ Lc~al Dr_scriptions 6/13/72
Tentative Tract No. 6569 ,
Po2Tl~N ~
;~.~=,- (Tentative Tract No. 6569 Excluding R-2/5000 Portion)
That portion of the :~outh one-half of the northeast ~quarter of SecCion 12,
Township 4 South, Range 10 Sdest, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana,
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Cnlifornia, as per map
filed in book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Diaps, in the office of the County
Recorder of said Couaty, described as follows:
Seginning at the iiitersection of the south line of the north one-half of
said south one-half oi Lhe northeast quarter with the west line of said
northeast quarter being the center line of Sunkist Street;
thence, along last described south line, North 89° 52' 10" Eaet, 1248.13
feet to the westerly line of the lnnd described in t~ook 8659, page 698
of Official Records of said Orange Caunty;
thence, along last said westerly line, South 6° 31' 29" West, 479.62 feet
to the north line of Tract No. 6459, as per map filc:d in book 241, pages
3, 4 and 5 of Miscellaneous Maps„ records of said 0~'ange County;
thence, along lasC said nor.th line, South 89° 52' 31" West; 1194.76 feet
:c the said west line of che northeaat quarter;
thence, alon~ last said wesL• line, North 0° 08' 10" East, 476.27 feeC to the
point oL beginning.
F.XCEPTING THEREFROM the westerly 57.00 feet thereof.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM that portion thereof described as followa:
Seginning at a point in the south line of the north one-half of said
south one-half of the northeust quarter, distant thereon North 89° 52' 10"
East, 289.00 feet from the west line of said northeast quarter, being the
center line of Sunkist Street, said point being the beginning of a non-
tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of 450.00 feet, a
radial line of said curve to lasC said point beara Suath 89° 52' 09" East;
thence southerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 20° 56' 13",
an arc distunce of 164.44 feet to a point of cusp with a curve concave
southerly and having a radius of 452.U0 feet; ,
thence easterly, a].ong laet eaid curve, thraugh a central angle of
22° 00' 33", an arc distance of 173.63 feet;
thence, tangent to last said curve, North 89° 52' 10" East, 573.00 feet
to the begir.ning of a non-tangent curve concave westerly and having a radiue
of 350.00 feet a radia~~.~~e of last said curve to ite point of beginning
beare South 68b 40'~I'~~J l IIBT,~; i~
thence northerly, along last said curve, through a cencral angle of
4° 37' 32", an arc distance of 28.26 feet;
thence NorCh 89° 52' 10" F.ast, 135.16 feet to the westerly line of the
land described i.n book 8659, Fage 698 of Officiul Records of suid Orange
County;
thence, along last said westerly line, North 6° 31' 29" East, 102.00 feet
to the said south line of the norCh one-half of the south one-halE of the
northeast quarter; ys~,6/
thence, along last described south line, South 89~ 52' 10" WesC,.$s~~s7.
~ feet to the point of beginning. ~
r.
i
~
7. That the requested variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare
ur injuriuus to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located.
8. That three persons appeared in opposition representing 30 persons present in the
Council Chamber also in opposition, and that petitions signed by persons representing 73
r•esidences in the immediate vicinity, were received in opposition.
NOW, THERF.FORE, HE IT RESOLVED thet the Anahelm Clty Planning Commission doea hereby deny subject
Yetition for Verience on thc basls oE the eforementioned flndinge.
THE F~REGOING RESOLUTION is aigned end epproved by me this ~ Oth day~ Ju 1 y 1°72.
CIT'Y
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALI.RED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYM4Ufi
NOES: CONiMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COAtMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEI2EOF, I heve hereunto eet my hend thls 20th day of Ju 1 y 1972 •
i~7V?t~/
SECRETARY ANAHE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~°~ ~~~~
SECRETARY ANHHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALiFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) eg•
CITV OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann KrebsSecretery of the City Plnnning Commisalon oE the City of Annhelm, do hcreby eeRity thet the Eorr
going resolutton wes pasaed end edopted ac e meeting of the City Plenning Comsisalon oEthe City of Anahefm, held oa
Ju 1 y 10 , 1972 et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the members thereoE:
RESOLUT[ON NO. PC 72-158
V2-D
_y.