PC 72-167~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-167
A RGSOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2398 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition Eor Veriance
from GEORGE T. REEVE, in care of Washington Laboratories, Incorporated, Pier 66, Seattle,
Washington 98121, Owner; WYN HOLMES, 802 South Wayfield, Orange, California 92666, Agent of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as Beginning at a point in the center of the Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company's
ditch, at the Southeaet cornei of the tract of land first described in a deed from S. L. Stone
and Louisa I. Stone, to August Lemke and Auguste Lemke, recorded in book 89, page 317, of Deede,
records of Orange County, California, and running thence aleng the center of the Santa Ana
Valley Irrigation Company's ditch South 55° West '2.40 chainsa thence South 62° 36' West still
along the center of said ditch 2.657 chains; thence North 23 30" West 10.893 chains thence
North 70° 25' Eaet 4.895 chains; thence South 23° 30' East along the East line of Lemke's land
9.503 chains to the point of beginning, containing 5.07 acrea of land. EXCEPT that portion
deeded to the State of California, recorded June 1, 1966 in book 7947, page 177, Official
Records
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiss:on did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on July 24, 1972, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es required
by law and in eccordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end consider
evidence for end against seid proposed veriance end to investigete and meke findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Cammissinn, efter due inspec(ioc., investigetion, and study mede by itself and in its behelf,
end aEter due consideratlon of all evidence end ceports offered at seid haering, does find and determine the following
facts:
i. Thet the petitioner reeuests variances from the Anaheim Municipal Code:
(a) SECTION 18.08.550
(b) SECTION 18,04.090(1-b)
(c) SECTION 18.24.030(4-a)
Minimum lot width on cul-de-sac lots. (60 feet required;
49 to 54 feet proposed)
Minirum front aetback. (15 feet sequired; 10 i.:et
proposed)
Minimum lot width. (70 feet required; 65 feet proposed)
2. Thet there are exceptionel or extraordinery circumstences or conditions applicable to the property involved
or tu the intended use cf the property that do not apply generelly to the property or cless of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. Thet the requested veriance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantiel property right
possessed 6y other pruperty in the seme vicinity and zone, and denied to the propeRy in question.
4. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimentel ta the public welfete or injurious to the prop-
crty or improvemertts in such vicinity and zone in which the proper:y is loceted.
5. That the petitioner stipulated to working with staff in order to provide the buffering
devices requi'red in the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Anaheim ae revised for the Scenic
Corridor.
V1-G -1-
i _ ~ ~
NOW, TH~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which ere heceby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed ase of the subjeot p:operty in order ;o presecve the sefety end genetel wclfere of the Citizens of the City of
Aneheim:
(1) That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No.
67-68-13.
(2) That subject property ahcll be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specificationa on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 6.
(3) That Condition No. 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final build-
ing and zoning inspec.:ons.
THE FOREGOING FYESOLUTION is ei~ed end approvai by me this 3rd day oE August, 1972.
AIRI~lAN ANAHEIM CITY ING ISSION
ATTEST:
~~ ~~~f'_
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se.
CTfY OF A2JfttlEIM ) ,
I, Ann Krebs, ~ccetery of :he City Plenning Commission of the City of Anehelm, do heceby certify that
the foregoing resolution waa peased end edopted et e meeting of the City PSanning Commission oEthe City of Anehelm,
held on July 24, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thercof:
AYES: COMMIS910NERS: rARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOFS: COMMISSIOI~ERS: NONE,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF~ I heve heteunto aet my hand this 3rd day of August, 1972.
RESOLUTION NO. PC72-167
_!e~~~ ~~~r~:~iG~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CJMMISSION
V2-G '2'