PC 72-19~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. P~72~19
A RESOI.UTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VAFIANCE NO. ~~ $E GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenniny Commiss:u~~ af the City of. Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Varience
fxom LOR~t7 E. SMITH, P. O. Box 42, Silverado, California 92676, Owner of certain
real property situated in the City o£ Anaheim, County of orange, State af
Calitornia, described as Lots 13 and 14 of Tract No. 498, z.s pex map thereof
r.ecorded in Book 19, pace 24 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said c,ranqe
County. EXCEPTING the South 50 fe~t of Lct 14
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing nt the City Hall in the City oF Anaheim
on February 7, 1972 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of >eid publicheeringhevingbeen duly given es cequi:ed
6y law nnd in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim hlunicipal Code, Cheptec 18.68,to hear end consider
evidence for and egeinst said proposed vecience end to investigete end meke findings end recommendetions in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissinn, eftec due inspection, investigetion, and study mede by itself and in its behelf,
and after due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered et seid heering, does find and detennine the following
fects: ~
1. Thet tl:e petitionec recuests a verience from the Anehelm Municipal Code:
SECTION 18.16.020 - Permitted Uaes -(Trailer, Camper, and Boat Storage Yards
not permitted; trailer, camoer, and boat etorage propoaed)
2. Thet there are exceptional or extreordinery circumstences or conditions appliceble to the p:operty involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generelty to the property or class of use in the seme vicinity
ond zone,
3. Thet the requested veriance is necessery fo: tha preservation end enjoyment of e substantial property right
possessed by oeher property in the seme vicinity end zone, and denied to the ptcperty in question.
4. Thet the requested vacience will not be materially detrimentel to the public welfare or injucious to the prop-
ecty or impi~vements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is loceted.
5. Th~t the petitioner atipulated to installation of chainlink fencing with slats.
6. That the petitioner atipulated to posting a bond to guarantee the installatiou of
cnrb, gutter, and sidewalk at the tima th= remainder of the property is developed along
Mountain View Avenue.
7. That no one appeared in opp-sition.
V?-G -1-
~ ~
NO~J, THEREFORE, BE IT' RESOLV~D that rhe Anaheim City Planning Ccnunission does hereby
grsnt subject Petition fur Variance, upon the following conditiuns which are hereby found to
be a necessary pxerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve
the safety and general welfare of the Citiz2ns of the City of Anaheim.
(i) That all engineering requirements of the City uf AnaUeim along Mountain View
P.~rer.ue, inci,uding preps.ation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such
a;s curbs ar.d guttea:•s, sidewalks. street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other ap-
purtonant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with
standard plans and specifications on file in tne offica of the Ci.~y Engineer; an~ that a bond in
an amount acid form satisfactory ta the. City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guar-
antee the installat9.on oi che aboce mentioned requirements. Said bond to be posted untiZ such
time as the remaining ~~rcels along Mountain `liew A~enue are develuped.
(2) That the owner(s) of suSject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of
$2.00 per front foot along Mountain View Avenue for street lighting purposes.
(3) Thar the owner(s) of su'oject property shall pay to Che City af Anaheim the sum of
154 per front foot along Mountai+.~ View Avenue for stree: tree planting purposes.
(4) That [rash stora~e areas ahall be provided in ~ccordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Dir~ctor of Public Works.
(5) That fire hydranta shall be instaZled as required and determined to be necessary
by the Chief of the Pire Department.
(6) That any exterior lighting stia'L1 bE: directed away from the sbutting proper.ty 1?nes
to eliminate a nuisance for adjoining propertiE~s.
(7) That subject propercy shall be ser•oed by underground utilities.
(8) That drainage cf subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to
the City Engineer.
(9) That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 tmd 2; provided, how-
ever:
(a) tbat a redwood slatted chainlink fence, six feet in height, surr.ound the subject
property;
(b) that landscaping in the form of 15 gallon trees of a variety set fortli in the
tree listing of the Sc.enic Corridor 2one shall be planted at 20 foot intervals
on the interior of the north, souch and west property lines and irrigation faci-
lities shall be provided;
(c) that a 25 fo~L- landscaped front setback be provided along Mountain View Avenue;
and;
(d) that a sewer dump station be provided for Che users of the proposed sL•orage
facility.
(10) That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be
posted with the City until at least 50% of the properties on the west side of the street are
developed to guarantee the installation of the sidewalk along Mountain View Avenue at that tiu~e.
(11) That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, above mentianed, shall be
complied with prior to the commencement of the activity authori.zad ur~der this resolution, nr
prior to the time thaC the building permit is issued, or within a period uf 180 days from dr.te
hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Plenning Commission may grant.
THE FORGGOING RESOLUTION is si;ned and ar~roved by e~his 17t dEy of February, 1972.
CHA Rb ANAHE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
.~ ~
SECRE R PRO TEM AD'A GITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIPORNIA )
COUhTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY ~F ANAHEIM )
I, Lee Burgess, Secretary pro tem of the City klanning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing reaolution ~~as partsen and adopted at a meeting of the CiCy
Planning Commi.ssion of the CiCy of Anaheisu, held on February 7, 197~, at 2:00 o'clock P.M.,
by the following vote uf the members ther~of:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARATIO, GAU~R, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE;,
ABSENT: COMMLSSIONERS: ?,LLRED,
I:i WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntc set my hand this 17th day of February, 1972.
c~.~
SECRETA Y PRO TEM A d~A ~IM CITY
PLANNIiIG COMMISSION •
RESOLIJTIO;I N0. PC72-19
V2-G -2-