PC 72-21RESOLUTI0~0. P~~2'Z1 ~
A P.ESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITiONAL USE PERMIT 1288 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petitien for Con-
ditionalUsePermitfrom A. L. AND M. E. RIST, 11621 Montecito, Los Alamitos,
California 90720, Owners; DALE L. INGRAM, P. 0. 23ox 229, E1 Monte,
California 91734, Agent, o£ certain real property situated i.n the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California. described as the East
198.00 feet of the West 396.00 feet of the North 660.00 feet of that
portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 3,
Tewnship 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa
Ana, as said section is shown on a map recor~led in Book 51 Page 10 of
Miscellaneous Maps in tl:e office of the County Recorder of said county,
lying easterly of the easterly line of the land conveyed to the California
Central Railway Company by deeds recorded November 9, 1887, in Book 327
Page 220 and in Book 327, Page 221 of Deeds, Records of Los Angeles County,
California
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
an February 7, 1972 , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearin;, having been duly given
as required by law and in accordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal code, Chapter 18.64, to hear
and consider evidence [or and egainst said proposed conditional use end to investigate end make findings and
recommendations in connec•tion thecewith; end
WHEREAS, said t:ommission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself end in its be-
halE, end aEter due considewtion of all evidence and reports offered et said heering, doec find and determine the
following fects:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which e Conditional Use Permit is euthorized by Code
SecLian 18.64.Oi:i(2-c) to establish a 219 unit, three-story motel.
2. That altheugn the applicant is requesting pErmission to
establish ~ motel at this location, experienc~ wi.th the same type of
complex built by the same developer has demonstrated that the units are
actualiy advertised and used as apartments and substandard apartments at
that. The proposed units are substantially smaller than the minimum re-
quired for apartments and the kitchen facilities are significantly smaller.
Furthermore, the parking facilities are provided on a one-s~ace per unit
basis rather than a 1.5 space per unit basis for apartments.
3. That the subject property is located in an industrial area and
residential uses should not be permitted to intrude into the industrial
areas.
4. 7.'hat the proposed use should not be considered as a motel catering
to the industrial cummun:.ty because salesmen and industrialists would have
no use far zhe kitchen faci].ities.
5. 7.'hat by representing this development as a motel a density of
over 100 units per net acre is achieved whereas the maximum density
permitted in the R-3 zone is only 36 units per net acre.
6. That the proposed use will advex~sely affect the adjoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located.
Cl-D " 1'
~ ~ ~
7. That granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditi.ons imposed will be detrimental to the peace, health, s3fety,
and general welfare af the citizpns of the City of Anaheim.
g, i'hat two persons representing adjoining industrial firms
appeared in opposition.
N07V, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anshelm Ciry Plenning Commiseion does hereby deny subject
Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the bas~s of the afaremenUoned itndings.
THE FOFtEGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by thi 17th y of February, 1972.
_ f ~ liGc,t~,•y
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY~ANAHEIM CITY P NING COMMISSION
pro tem
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se•
CITY OF ANAHEIM j
pro tem
I, L ee Burges s, Secretery/oE the City Plenning Cnmmisaion oE the City of MaheIm, do heceby cectlfy thet the fo:e-
going resolution was pesaed end adopted at a meetiag of the City Plenning Commission of the Ciry of Aneltaim, held on
February 7, 1972 , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by t}ae following vote of tF^ members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FAAANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuato set my hend this 17th day of February , 19 72 .
i ~'
SEI:RETARY~INAHEIM CITY PL 1~ G COMMISSION
PC72-21 pro tem
RESOLUTION NO.
C2-D "~