PC 72-234. _ ~ ~
RESOLUTION NO
PC72-234
A RF.SOLL?T.ION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
TIiAT PETITI4N FOR Vt1RIANCE N0. 2433 BE GRANTEQ
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Varience
from ALFRED B. LIPPITT, TRUSTEE, in care of Cliarles Lippitt, 14328 Victory Boulevard, Van Nuys,
California 91401, Owner; ENVIROffi~1EPTfAL LBISURE CORPORATION, 126 North Euclid Avenue, Fullerton,
California 9263'L, Asent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, described as That portion of Lot 6 of South Placentia Tract No. 2,
as shown on a Map thereof recorded in Book 5, page 42 of Miacellaneoue Maps, records of said
Orange County, described as fo3.:awa: Parcel 1 as shown on a map £1~~?d in Book 42, page 21 of
Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of suid Orange County. Excepting therefrom
Che Easterly 60,50 feet thereof
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City oE Anaheim
on September 6, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public heacing havir.g been duly given es required
by lew and in accocdence with the ptovisions of the Anaheim Municipel ~ode, Chepter 18.68,to hear and consider
evideuce for and egainst said pcoposed veriance and to investigete and make findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewitn; end
WHEREAS, said Commissi~n, efter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself end in its behelf,
end after due consideration of ell evidence and reports offered at ~eid heacing, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests a varience from the Anaheim MuniciFal t de as follows:
SECTION 18.62.090(B-5) - Min3mum distx.~_ ~~~+' '.ae-standing tsiAn to adiacent
pronertv li~.~.~ ~:~ ,e~r sequired; 15 feet proposed)
2. Thet there are exceptionel or extraordinery circumstances or conditions eppliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not epply generally tc the property or cless of use in the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. Thet the requested variance is necessery for the preservation and enjoyment of e substantial property right
possessed by other property in the snme vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested veriance will not be meterially detrimental to the public wel(ere or injurious to the pmp-
cRy or impcovements in such vicinity and zone in which the propetty is loceted.
5. That the proposed sign could be in conformance with the sign ordinance if the 60-foot
~trip ta the eest were dedicated and developed es a street, which in ~11 likelihood will, in
thz future, ~ahen the landlocked parcel to Che south of said access is eventually develoued.
V1-G -1-
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim CiQy Plenning Commission does hereby grent subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditians which ace hereby foun3 to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
pose~j use of the subject property in ocder to pceserve the sefety end generel welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
~1) That adequate clearance of existing electrical lines shall be provided as required
by the Ele:~:rical Division, Department of Public Utilities and the State of California G.0.95.
(2) That aubject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 provided,
however, that the sign shall be placed at a location that will be in conformance with the
sign ordinance at such time as the 60-foot st*Ip to the east is dedicated and developed as
a street.
THE FOREGOING RESOLU'i`i0N ie ai~ed ead eppro~•ed by me Lhis 14~ day of ~ag~ember, 1972.
~ITY
ATTEST:
~iAL/!Y~/ ~~~r~/~/ -
S~CRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIUN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ee•
CITY OF AIvAHF.IM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted et a meeting of the Cih~ Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
held on September 6, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the members theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ALZRED, 1ZOWLAND.
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend thls 14th day of September, 1972.
RESULUTION NO. PC72-234
S y~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G 'Z'