PC 72-240~
RESOLUTION NO
PC72-240
u
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 0~' THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. ~2'~3'22 SE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Reclassifice-
tionfrom CARL E. AND CAROL A. WAGNER, 2338 E. Wagner Avenue, Anaheim, California 92806,
Owners of certain real property sitaated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California,described as The Northerly 3 acres of the East half. of the North half of
the Northeaat quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 13, in Township 4 South,.Range
10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Aua as per map recorded in Book 51, page 7,
et seq., Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said Countj~...EXCEPT
THEREFROM t•he Easterly 540,79 £eet... '
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissiort did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
September 1R, 1972, at 2:00 o'cluck P.M. notice of seid' public hearing heving been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anahe?~.i Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for end against said ptoposed reclassification en~ to investigate and make findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commissioa, after due inspection, ilvestigatian, end study made by itself and in its behelf, end
efter due consideration of all evidence end reports oEfered at said hearing, does find and determine the following fects:
1. That the petitianer pcoposes a reclessificetion of the above desc:ibed propedy from the R-A, AGRICULTURAL,
ZONE to the R-1, ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONE.
2. ThaC the propased reclassification is in conformance with the land use designation
~f the General Plar..
3. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessery end/or desireble for the orEerly end pro-
pec development oE the community.
4. Thet the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relete to the zones and their permitted
uses locelly estebtished in close proximity to subject property and to the zones ond thel: permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
5. That the proposed recZassificstion of subject properl•y requires the dedication and
improv~ment of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Efement of the General
Plan, due tu the anticipal•ed increase in traffic, which will be generated by the intenaifi-
cation of land use.
6. Thet approval of suhject petition was a condition of aFproval of Reclasaification
No. 72-73-12.
R-A -1-
. NOW, THEREFORE, bE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenn~ Commiseiort does hereby rxc~mmend
to the City Council oE the City oE Anaheim thet aubject Pe3tion for Reclesatfice~ion be epproved nnd. Eq su 6oing,
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Anehelm Municipel Code be amended to exclude the above descri~d progerty from the
R-A, AGRICULTURAL, ZONE and to incorporate said described Qroperty into the R~'1, qN~ I'AMILY
RESIDENTIAL, ZONE upon the followLng conditions which nre hereby faund to be a tiecessary
prerequisice to the proposed use of subject property in or~er to preserve the as~eXy and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
(1} Th~t the owner(s) of subjecC property ahall deed to the City a£ nnaheim a strip
of land 45 feet in width fr~m the centerliae of Che a`reeC ala~l~ Wabner f:venue for ~treet
widening purpose~.
(2) That a~~.l ~^r.(~~n~~xii~g requir.emei~~ri o.f ~~~:: Git;a a5 ;knaheim along 4Fc::ner ;.~.•:_a^,,
includiag preparation tit i,,;;+ceveme;tr ~,la~:a fli~ii 5.i~tif'ti'c1$CiVn n;' ~~ ~•Lmproveroe'.:: auc,: ,e
curbs and gutters, sidewalke, street grading and pa~:.:~~,;, '~[~a%.h~3p,~ ~F.r•i2~t3k^ or oth<-~ appur-
tenant work shall be complied with as required by tha i;fty rng9.r+a;.~ ~z•~~ci t~: ~ccorda^c..:~ ~~ith
standard plans and specifications oa file ~r :l~e off~~c ~f ~hc~ ~:tty '.;n„ii~~r.:-; ~nd ~:.;.,.;: a
bond in an amount znd form sati.sf8cl:ory e~ t~~s ti;i5y ~+~ Aeahei.m ~t3a~~. b~ pam?r..:' w??~E: r.., ~:~Ly
td guarantee th2 installatian of the above mentioned requirements.
(3) 'Phat the owner(s) of subject property ahall pay to the City of Anahc;~ t9ie suT~.
of ¢2.00 per front foot along Wagner Aver.ue for atreet lighting purposes.
(4) That Che owner(s) of subject prcperty sha11 pay to the City of Anaheim the suri
of 15 cente per front foot along WagnEr Avenue for tree planting purposea.
(5) Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning aubject property, Condition
Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights gcanted
by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unleas said
condition~s bre complied with within one year from the date heseof or such further time as
the City Council may grant.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end apocoved by me Ehis 28t~I day of S~p'k~tnber, 1972.
ANAHEIM CITY
ATTEST:
~i~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI5SION
STATE OF CALIFflRNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Kreba, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Anaheim,
held on September 18, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FAItANO, GAUER, HERBS.T, xar,,roon, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NO~S: COMMISSIONERS: NONF..
ABSENT: COM6IISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 28th day o`c September, 1972.
RESOLUTION NO. PC72-24~
R2-A
C:~~
SECRETARY AN'AYiEI~M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_y.