PC 72-250RESOLLTTI~NO. 72-950 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2449 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissi~n of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from
iONDON, AIsiL AND COMPANY, 8727 West Third Street, Los Angeles, Colifornia 90048, Owner;
DOROTHY HASENPLAUGH, 1731 South Euclid, Suite C, Anaheim, Celifornia 92802, Agent of
certain reel property eituated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State o£ Cali-
fornia, described as follows: The Westerly 80.00 feet of that portion of Lot 17 of the
Anaheim Homeatead Tract, as per map recorded ir. book 26, page 10 of Miscellaneous Records,
in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, included withi.n the following
described lines: Beginning at the intersection of the center lines• of North Street and
West Street as ahown on eaid map; thence South 85° 19' 00" Weat 180.00 feet elong said
center line of North Street to the Northerly prolongation of the Easterly line of the land
described in the deed to Herbert E. Blackwell, et ux., recorded July 16, 1952, in book
2357, page 93 of Official Recorde; thence Southerly 170.66 feet along said prolongetion
and Easterly line to the Northerly line of the land described in the deed to Ruth Brnwn,
recorded May 8, 1952, in book 2326, page 519 of Official Records; thence Easterly along
said Northerly line end its Easter.ly prolongation to said center line of West Street;
thence Northerly 175.02 feet along last said center line to the point of beginning; and
WHEREAS, lhe City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the Ciry of Maheim on
October 18, 1972 at 2:00 o'clock p.m., noUce of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and
in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; a~id
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
i. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Maheim Municipal Code as followa :
SECTION 18.20.030(4-d) - Minimum ~round iloor livinst area. (2000 sauare feet
required; 1415 square feet proposed)
2:~~het the•~p0titioner proposee to move-on 8 single iemiLy~reeiflpnEial ettucture on
subject property.
3. That the petitioner ie requesting a reduction of the minimum dwelling unit square
footage requirement by more than 29%, which would appear to be granting the petitioner a
privilege nat enjoyed by development occurring and be.ing approved in this genetal area.
4. That the petitioner did not svbmit subatantiating evidence that a hardship exieted
because of the size and shape of the parcel.
5. That the aize and ehape of the parcel is adequate to provide a dwelling unit with
a minimum ground floor space of 2000 aquare feet in confo~ance with code requirement.
6. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstancea or conditions appli-
cable to the property involved or to the intended uae of the property that do not apply
generally Lo the groperty or clase o£ use in the aeme vicini:y and zone.
7. That the requested variance ia not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
a svbsl-anti.al property right possesaed by other property in the sa~qe vicinity and zone,
and denied to the property in queation.
8. That the requested variance will Ue materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurioue to the property or improvemeats in such vicinity and zone in which the property
is located.
9. That two persone appeared in op~oaition, and that one peraon presented a petition
aigned by 18 persons representins 13 properties in the immediate area, also in oppoaition.
VI-D - l -
UEV-66•E
,~ ~ .,~~
,"' ".
~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, H~ IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim Clty Pl~nala~ Commissioa doe~ hereby deny subJect
Petition for Yedanee on the besis of the aEoromentloned flndinge.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION !s eigned end appcoved by me this 26th day of October, 1972,
~ ? ~ ~
,' . .%C'~"""'- .r. ~
i ~~~~= ,~ .J /~~i~ '
`.~'~"~=•~/ "/ ~ ~ .. . '~/~~ . ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNA~i .COMMISSIO~^
ATTGST: ~ •
r' e ,~
;
G~~ ~~2~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se. ' ~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebe~ ~ Secretary of the City Planning Commiselon of the City of Maheim, do heroby ceRi(y,t}wt the foro-
going ~eaolutlon wea passed end adopted at a meeting oE the City Plannlr.g Commi~cioa of the Ciry of Mehelm, held on
Octobe~ 18, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vate of ffie mwmben thenof:
AYES: CdMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONER.S: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ROWLAND,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto e~t my hend thie 26th day of October, 1972.
~~
SECRETARY ANAHEiM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-250
V2-D ~Z-