PC 72-261~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-261
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAIiEIM
THAT PE'I'ITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2403 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of lhe City of Anaheim did receive a veri~ed Petition for Variance from
ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, Attention of C.R. Nelson, 400 Civic Center Drive,
Santa Ana, California 92701, Owner; PACIFIC AMERICAN PROPERTIES, 1NCORPORATED, Attention
of Bernard Perlin. 3670 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90010, Agent of cer-
tain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, CounCy of Crange, State of California,
as describes in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in
full; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public heuring at the City H~11 in thc City of Anaheim on
October 30, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notice of said publir. I}earing having becn duly given as required by law and
~n accordance with the pruvisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapler 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, invesdgation, and study madc by itseif and in its bchalf, and after duc
consideration of all evidence and reports ofCered at said he.aring, does find and determine the following facts:
1. Thatthepetitioner:equests variances from Che Anahgim Municipal Code as follows:
a. SECTION 18.40.070(3-a) - Maximum buildinS height. (5 feet and 29 feet
permittec~.; 30 feet proposed)
b. SECTTON 18.40.070(6-a) - Zone boundary wall. (6 foot high solid masonry
wall required; no wall proposed)
2. That d+ie to the fact that the Planning Commission has recommended disapproval af
cl~e reclaseifica,tion of auhjec¢ property, the variance request cannot be exercised in Che
existing zone on the proQerty.
3. T:iat there are no exceptional ur er.traordinary circumscences ur condi~ions appli-
cable tu the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply
generally to the property or clae3 of use iti the same vicini[y and zone.
4. That the requested variance is not necessary for Lhe preserva~ion and en}oyment
of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zor,c,
and denied to Lhe property in question.
5. That the requested variance will be materiaily detrimental Co the public welfare
or injurious to the Qroperty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the pcoperty
is located.
V1-D
DEV-66•t
:~
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
1 "
~ {
~
~ !
, . . , ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 1 ; A ~'".r!`' C,'y,t ~ ' _ .
... .. . .;i~~~' ~' •.~~ ~, ` ,
.~, . \\~.";i.' ~'~`~~~i/ . '~
. . - ,~~ ~% ~'~r%.. ~ . . • i ~
~ First ~ nt~riGait Tille Insu~a~lce Conrp~ny ~. .
~ 421 NOR7H lAAIN 5~''REE7 • SAN7A ANA. CALIFORNIh • b47•6092 ~ ~ ~ ~
. . ~. . . ' . . . .. . . ~
. . ~ .`. . . . . . ~ . .. ~ •
~ ,
1~
~ ~ .
1
~ , ~
' ' ~==~c~~~ ...~c4.d~. • ~~' ~~~~,• i; . , . ,
. . ~ :~` ~ `~ `~~ •~:
. , • ' , , N ~V \`~ u
. . ' . .. . ~,, ~F 1~t~ ° ~ ,." ".
. . ~ ~~~~ ` °~
. . , ' ~'~9lSUZU~` '
~ ~ . , . . . . . .. ~ , ,
~ . r..~..^...J: ji? Q.'~. .(..-.._. . .. . . ' ;' . ~r.. ' ., , ;•.
{~~~ ~~,~~ ~~ ~,. : ~~_~~ t;:~, . . ~ ~~:~IB~; -, .~~ > r ~. . ",t ;:
~._„ ., ,..~~-..~~,-. . i~.....A'.
.,.~.~. L:..., c::.~.c~...._ 1 . . . .
, ~ . r . : .. . . ~ .. ~ .
, /.il..-,': _ 1•w wi vrZ . . . . . • • ~ . ' ~ ~ • •
. , ~
Your No. : l.~Z:'~ t.::i .^.ICt•.`.i ~ i.C?.:...acS Zc;C. '. .i.
ourOrderno, "C: "C~~573 ~~ ~ ~~ '
Form oi ,Poliey Covcrogo Requcsted: C:..T.ITO~.:IA LA'.i~ iiZLl'~ ~~.•JGVTL~i~C.': STb:iD:.;,~J Cay~^•.'.,."''.. POLZC:
••(n responsn !o the ebove refcrenced application for a policy of titie insurance, this Company hereby reports 1hat.it~,. ,~.;~,
is p;apc:cd to issuc, or ca~sc fo bc iss~od, as of tho dotc hcrcof, o Policy of Titlc insuroncc in thc fonn spcciFicd ~
cSovc, dcscribing thc lond cnd tFc c:totc or intcrest thcrcin horcinoftcr sct f~rth, insuring against loss which may •~' ~
be sustained by reasonof any ooFecs, lien or encumbronce oot .liown or refetred to as on Ezteption bclow ~or not '
~ exeluded irom coverayo pursuunt to fno printed Scf~edules, Conditions ond Stipulations of said poliey form. '. "
Tnis report (ond e~y supplements or emendments thoretu)ia iasucclsolely for thopurpose of Focilitoting tho issuaneo ."~
of o pelicy of tit~a insuraneo and no liobility is assumod'nc~eby. If it is desired that liability bo ossumed prior to
'he issuanco of e policy of titlo insuranto, o Binder or Commitmcnt should be rcqucstcd.
Doicd cs of ~.j„j 2~ Y912 ~ ot 7:30 a.m. ~~ ~~ ~~,~ -~~. r. ,
L. 3. L~.Z:L'.3 TITLE'OFFiCeR••'
. .. . . .. ..'i. .
7itlo.to :aid cstato or.int.rost ot tho dato hcrcof is vosted in: ' ,
G~.'::^ CG~ .~i :e.~:,~ C3:~:i_~F. D'L~i.'~~ , ccqui.vd "cy dcozoo `"~ ..
M ~ ^„~z . , '..
,. .::J:'~:L3 C:.~~:.•:.:: ~~~ 1933 ~ uC..... ~5%~ p~ry:. 1~3 Ga ~ . 9,~ .,
7hu es:afo ar interest in tho lond hcroinoftcr do.cribed or reforred to covarud by-F;;rid ~~porf it:
d r~~~. ~ VHRIA(~C~ NQ, ~~,,,~0~ _
~~w.
At 2Fs doto hcrcof cxcepfiun, to eovurogo in addition to tho printed oxccptions ond axelusi'Bfl4; coMoin~ in toid
policy (orn v.o~ld bo o, follows:
.''.. ~:.~'.O ~::.~:.':.".:'it~.i'v: ::Q.'.~:7~ T.^.ii:0a'.~G .^.::2 (:~~C::.^.9 GG 1 G~:.'.7 G~ 2.:.:.3 3~ f: ~~
t:S~:~q G~ ~~a f.G~.jA~L'~:: ~:.:..°i C:.GJ G'~C:a 4~ Ci:J w0~ :~ :~~ :.:U~ .~. :~~i.:~ rY.i.C~~ L.:'.~i Ci 3
1':.~:. ..... ~'v : C~ 5::~~ 1:.'.a G::~ C:. "a3. C. C:^ „ ~.^.(Z'IIb.{:T~Z`G~.....~:.:7 O. 1::.i.Ci j~~
. ' v~r1r lv'4A./'r~.il -`t . ~ l.+Y !:!j ,,/ ~ ' • •
~ ._.. (coatini:ad) •. ~ . . , . , ~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (3 PARCELS)
PARCEL I -•CAR 4!l15H SiTE: • ~
That portion of the East half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter
of.the Southeast quartcr Section 7, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the
City of Anaiieim, Co~nty of Orange, State of California, in Lhe Rancho Los
Coyotes, as shown on a map recorJed in Book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous 11aps~
records of Grange County, describe~ as follows:
BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the West line of said East half ar.d a
line parallel with and 45.00 feet Southerly of the centerline of Crescent Avenue,
as said centerlin~: is shown on Recorci of Survey iiled in Book 35 page 20; thenee
North 88° 34' 54" East along said pai•allel line 74.15 feet to a point in the
Southerty li~e of that certain parcel of'land conveyed to the County of Orange ~
by deed recarc:ed June 14, 1960 in Book 52g6, page 456 of Official Records;
' the~nce South &4° 55' 35" East along said South~:rly line 176.95 feet to an angle
eoint therein; thence South ~i5° 43' 34" East atong said Westerly line and its .
Southerly prolongatio~ 130•00 feet; thence North 53~ 27' 13" West 81.68 feet
to a point in a line parallel with said paratlel tine and 120.00 feeC Southerly,
measured along said Vlest line of said East half, said point to 5.00 fect Westerly
of said IJesterly line and its Southerly prolongation, measured along last mentioned
• parallel tine; thence South 88° 34' S4" West 205.20 fcet te a point in said West
line of said East half; thence North 0° 43' 46" West 120.00 feet atong said West
line to the POINT OF 6EGINWING. '
PARCEL II - CONVENIENCE CEtlTER:
That portion of the East half of the Northeast quarter of the Nor:heast quarter of
the Southeast quarter Section 7, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, Statc of Catifornia, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as
~~shoYm on a map recorded in Book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of
Orangc County, described as follows:
' Comnencing at the point of intersection of the West line of said East,half and a
line parallel with and 45.00 feet Southerly of the centerline of Crescent Avenue,
as said centerline is sha~n on Record of Survey filed in Eook 35 pege; tf~~ence
North 88° 34' S~+" East along said parallcl iine 74.15 feeC to a point 1n the Souther
iine of that certain parcel of land conveyed to thc County of Orange by deed recorde
June 14,.1960 in Book 5286, page 456 of Official Records; thence South 84° 43' 3~+"
• Fast 28.28 feet to a point in the 4lesterly line of said par~el of l~nd; thence South
~° 43' 36" East along said 4lesterty line and its Southerly protongation 130.00 feet
thence North 53° 27' 13'' West 81.68 feet to a point in a line parallel with said
parallel tine and 120.00 feet Southerly, measured along said West line of said East
half, said point to 5.00 feet Westcrly o` said Westcrly line and its South~rly .
prolongation, measured along last mentioned parralel line; thence South 88 3~~' S4"
. West 205.20 feet to a point in said West line of said Easr half, said polnt being
/`~,~~F,~ the true POINT OF BEGI:JNING of this description
?o a ~
,%,^ f~ ~~, ~~~~~Thence South 0° 48' 46" East, 120.25 , thence North 86° 34' S4'~' East, 270.20'
c, `~~~ ~°~kU 'r~,to the interssotion of Westcrly line of Brookhurst Strect per O.R. 5286-456;
~ G~,~~r~ ~~tfience North 0 43' 36" Fast, 70.00 feet; thence along said North 53° 27' 13"
~ c C~~' ci'~~,o~` v and South 88° 34' 54" Wes t 1 i nes to the P01 NT OF 6EG 1 NN I IJG .
~`c. ti,~~ `~o „ •
~~°!t,,,~rPARCE~° II - OFFICE COI~MERCIAL:
~,~. _
The East half of the Norr.heast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast•
quarter of Section 7~ Tadnshlp 1~ South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes,
as sha~un on a map recorded in Dook S1, page,l0 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of t
Orange County, Californ•ia ~
EXCEPTING Parcel I and II described ahove. vit~~l~l'~(:L ~~U._2Lyo,3
~
~
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning Comminsion do~s hereby deny subject
Petitlon for Vedence on the besie oE the aforementloned findlnqe.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end eppeoved by me this ,~9th day of November, 1972.
~ _r.i ~_.
/~~~ (•' ---~ ,~~
i ~
;• CHAIRMAft ANAHEIM CITY P~ N~1ING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~/ %
i ~
`~.~it~ ~i~2'~'~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAN4E ) se. '
CITY OF ANANEIM )
I, A¢~~ Secretary of the Clty Plenning Commiaeion of the Ciry oE Anahefm, do heroby eeRify thet the fore-
going resolution wae pessed end edopted at e meeting of tha Clty Plnnning Commiseion oEthe Clty of An~helm, held on
October 30, 1972 at 2:00 o'cloek p,M., by the following vote oE the membere themof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMIS510NERS: NON~.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 hev~ hereunto set my hend thia 9th day of November, 1472.
~/~/~ %~/~~:~'a/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC72"261
V2-D
_2.