PC 72-297•
~
RESOLUTION NO. PC72-297
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETFTION FOR VARIANCE NO. 244s BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verifled Petition for Vednnce
fcom R.C. JEWETT AND DIXIE STEPHENS, 2~42 Eaet Chapman - F, Orange, California 92669, Ownera;
BOMAINE CORPORATION, Attention of Louis Mann, 2121 South Bundy Drive, Los Angeles, California
90064, Agent of certain real property situeted in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of Caliiornia, described a's The southerly 150 feet of the northerly 210 feet of the following
desciibed property: Parcel C, as shown on a map fi~.ed ;n Sook 22 Page 32 of Parcel Mapa, recorda
of Orangg dounty
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public headng et the City Hell in the City of Aneheim
on November 27, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heedng having been duly given es cequired
by law end in ecco:denc.e with.the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear end considec
evidence for end egainst seid proposed variance end to investigate end make findings and recommendetions in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commiesinn, after .due inspecUon, investigetlon, end study mede by itaelf end in ite behalf,
end efter due consideration of ell evidence end eeports offered at said heering, does find end determine the following
fects: • '
1. That the petitioner reauests e vecience from the Anaheiro Municipel Code:
SECTION_18.52.020 - Permit_ted Uses to permit a retail car care center in the '
M-1 Zone.
2, Thet there are exceptionel or extcaordinery ciccumstences or conditiona appliceble to the propeety involved
or to the intended use of the propecty thet do not epply generelly to the property or claes of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested verience is necessery for the prese~vetion and enjoyment of a substentie! property right
possessed by other pcoperty in the same vicinity end zone, end denied to the propedy in question.
4. Thet the tequested vecience wiil not be metedally detrimentel to the public welfete or lnjur?ous to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity end zone in which the pcopedy is located.
5. That the petitioner stipylated that all work would be performed indoore and that
:here would be no outdoor atorage of use~l tirea or parts.
6. That the petitioner atipc:lated that the only eigning required would be a wall aign
of approximately 23 equare feet in area.
7. That one pereon appeared in oppoaition.
V1-G '1'
~
~
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet ihe Anaheim City Plenning Comm~saion does heceby gcant subject
Petition for Veriance, upon the Eollowing conditions which are hereby found to be e necessery prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property itt ordet to pcesetve the safety end genecal welfere of the Citizens of the City ai
Aneheim:
(Z) .That the aidewalks ahall be installed along Katella Avenae as,etequired by the City
Engineer aad in accordance with standard plans an3 apecifications on file in the office of the
City Engineet. ~
(2) That the owner(s) of subject property ehall pay to the City ~f Anaheim the aum of
$2.00 per front foot along Katella Avenue for street lighting purposes.
(3) That appropriate water assessmsnt fees.ah determined by the Director of Public
iJtilities sha]~l bg paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the iasuance of a building permit.
(~i) That traeh storage areas ahall be provid'ed in accord~nce with approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Worke,
(5) That all air conditioning faciliCies ahall be properly shielded from view.
(6) That a parcel map to record the approved division of subject property be aubmitted
to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County
Recorder.
(7) That subject property shall be aerved by underground utilities.
(8) That the final parking plan ~hall be approved by the Development Servicea Depart-
ment, and any landecaped areas in the perking area ahall be protected with six-inch high con-
crete curba and concrete wheel stops shall sEopa ehall be provided for parking apacea ae re-
quired by the Development Services Department.
(9) That aubject property ahall be developed substantially in accordance with plana
and specific~tione on file with the City of Anahefm merked Exhibit No. 1.
(10) That Condition Nos: 2 and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the
commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution or prior to the time that the
•~building permit ia iasued, or within a pe2lod of one year from date hereof, whichever occurs
first, or such further time as the Planning Commisaion mey grant.
(11) That Candition Nos. 1, 4, 5, 7, and S, above mentioned, Ehall be camplied with
prior to final buildtng and zoning inepectiona.
(12) That there ahall be no outdoor storege of old tirea and usEd parts as stipulated
to by the petitioner.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is si~ed ~nd ~pproved by me this
ATTEST:
~i~~~ ~~5~'......'-~ -
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNL~TG COMMISSION
STATE OF CA~'.IFORNLI )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CTTY OF ANAHEIM ) ~ i
i, Ann Kreba, Seceetery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anehdm, do hereby certify thet
the foregoZng Tesolution wes pa~saed end edopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commisslon of the City of.Mshe;m,
held on November 27 ~ 1972, at 2:00 o'clxk P.M., by the following vote of the membecs thereof:
AyES; COMMISSIONERS: GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR.
NOFS: COMMISSIONERS: ROWLAND.
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO.
iN {qITNESS WHEREOF, I have herounto eet my hand thin 7th day of December, 1972.
1tESOLUTION NO. PC72'297
c;~~~~.~-
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIdG COMMISSION
V2-G '2'