PC 72-318I . '.y.y...
~
RESOL~N N0. PC72-318 ~
p RESOLUTIO~T P~ TION FOR NARIADiCEMNO.s 458 F B~GRANf~D~N PA T
µ~[igREps~ the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim did reaive a vadfied Petttiort for Variance fcom
HUMBLE OIL AND REFINING COMPANY, Attention of T.S. Hotsey, 500 SouCh Mein Street, Orange,
California 92668, Owner; HOLM, TAIT AND ASSOCIATES, 900 Orangefair Lane, Anaheim, Celi-
fornia 92801, Agent of certain .real property aituated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of Californt.s, dencribed as That pOrCidn of the Southeaet quarter of Section
8, Township 4 South, Range 10 Weat, S. B. B. & M. deecribed ae followe: Beginning at the
intersection of the Southerly line of the land dee;cribed in the deed to M. F. Schueller
and wife recorded April 6, 1966 in Book 7892, page 458 of Official Recorde, with the Eest-
erly line o£ said Section; thence South 0° 15' 30" Eaet along said Eea~erly line 45.08 .
feet to the Northeasterly corner of the land described in the deed to the State of Califor-
nia, recorded April 26, 1956 in Book 3438, cPage''i~98.cuif G£ficisl 'LtecordsJ.•thed~e• alung ~the
isound$ry;~7;ine~.:of~ the::la~dd: tielcribe~•ta•saLd~,d@~d, o'he~.'folloang beasi;pgs .aid..3i9tan~est North &y°
31' 10" West 33.98 feet, Southwesterly along a cu~rve concave Easterly and having a radiue
of 210 feet, an arc diatance of 82.55 feet, South 0° 15' 30" Eaet 4.35 feet, South 45° 06'
39" West 28.10 feet and North 89° 31' 10" Weat along said boundary line and along the
boundary line of the land described in the deed to the State of Californie, r.ecorded April
26, 1956 in Book 3487, pege 448 of Official Recorde, a dietance of 151.37 feet to the West-
erly line of the land described in deed to Hdwin.E. Heecock and wife, recorded November 14,
1966 in Book 8102, page 451 of Officiel Records; thence North 0° 15' 30" WethencenSouthd89°
t3enterly 11ne 150.00 feet to the Southerly line of said land of Schueller;:
32' 22" East elong said Southerly line 221.37 feeC to the point of beginning
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a pub8c neacing at the City Hell in the City of Maheim on
November 27, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notlce of aaid public hearing heving been duly givan as required by law and
in accordance with the provisiona of the MaheLn Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for and egainst said
proposed vadance and to inveatigate Ond meke findinga and recommondatlona in connecdon therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspecUon, inveaflgation, end study made by itself and in its behelf, and aftar due
considuation of all evidenca and reporte offered at said hearing, dooa find and d~termine the following fects: •
1. That the petitloAer requeeta : yes'ianca~ ~ fr0ei'the AAn.'t1le:lm I3uc-icipal Code ae f.ollowe:
a. SECTION 18.62.090(B-1) - Maximum numi~r of permitCed free-etandinB siana,
One sign per street frontege parmitted;.fourn, •~
propoeed)
b. SECTION 18.62.090 - Minimum heiRht of a free-etandinR eiRn. (Eistht
' feet minimum height to the lowest portion o£ a
sign required; two feet. two inches proposed for
two portablc signa) .
c. SECTION 1$.62.040(B-1) - Minimum dietance batween free-etandina eiRns on
the eame_varcel. 300 feet minimum distance re-
quired; three signs within 20 feet and one sign
within 80 feet propos~d)
d. SECTION_1A.62.090 - Minimum dietance of e free-etandinst aiRn from an
abuttinR Percel. (60 feet required; 50 feet pro-
posed)
2.,Thet"the petitioner modified his request in Waiver 1-a, ebove mentioned, by with-
drawing his request for two portable free-standing signe; therefore, the request was for only
one additional free-standing aign advertieing "self-aerve" island.
3. That the petitioner withdrew Waivera 1-U and 1-d, above mentioned, by withdrawing
hie request for two porteble free-standing eigne.
4. That the petitioner modified his requeet in Waiver 1-c, abuve mentioned, by with-
drawing his request for two portable free-etanding eigns; therefore, the request would be for
the diatance of one aign within SO feet of another existing free-standing sign.
~,• ~ -1-
DEV-66•E
~ ~
5. That ther.e are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditiona applicable
to the property involved or to the intended uae of the property that do not apply generally to
the groperty or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
6. That the requested variance ie neceaeary for the preaervation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right poesessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
7, That the requeeted variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commiseion does hereby
grant in part eubject Petition for Variance, upon the followtng conditiane which are hereby
found to be a necessery prerequiaite to the proposed uee of the subject pYOperty in order to
preserve the eafety and general welfare of the Citizene of the City of Anaheim:
(1) That eubject property ahall be developed subatantially in canformeace with plana
and apecificatione on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1 provided, however,
that the portaL•le free-standing e!gns shall be eliminated as stipulated by the petitioner~
and thaC the only additional aign that will be permitted is the lighter box eign under the
canopy.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is eigned and approved by me this 7th dey of Decemtec, 1972.
I AHEIM CITY P IN C SSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COIIIIISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ea.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebe, Secretary of the City Plenning Commiasion of the Ci.ty of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was peseed end adopted at a meei:ing of the City
Plenning Commieaion of. the City of Anaheim, held on November 27, 1972, at 2:00 o~clock p.m.,
by the following vote of the membera thereof;
AYES: COPIlIISSIONERS: GAUER, HERBST, IfAYW00D, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COPASISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COt+QiISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, ROWLAND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I nave hereunto aet my hand thie 7th day of December, 1972,
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-318 -2~